Donald Trump and Bill Clinton attended orgy parties with underage girls.

[Hanafuda]

This isn’t ironic. Someone made a claim, they should be asked for the proof for that claim.
You also asked for source, got one, then went into cognitive dissonance. I am really concerned by the layers of mental gymnastics you go through to deny the reality that Trump is monster and you got scammed

Incorrect.

"sourced accusations", i.e. who is the alleged victim that made the accusation? Not which govt. agency had a document with the complaint typed out on it. (duh)

I also asked about when these complaints were received.

And it was ironic, because there is no "proof" for any of the claims at the OP, but Seltzer was demanding proof of another claim (i.e. the daycare fraud thing).

 

[urherenow]

It's fun watching the vultures. None of them even know what they're looking at, but they're salivating.

First and foremost, the documents seem to be scanned in reverse order, so start from the bottom.

1) You have an unknown (redacted) party, replying to another unknown (redacted) party, with a list of people, who supposedly called a tip line. Specifically ones that mention Trump. With a disclaimer that a number of these "tips" are not first-party.

2) You have a list of what these tips were, with notable names mentioned

3) (at the top) You have results of somebody trying to corroborate anything at all from these tips.

What did they get?

No contact info
Incorrect contact info
A dead person
Someone who was so doped up, that they didn't even know what was real
Someone who says there is video, but never sent a video
Someone who said they had email proof, and never sent an email

and a bunch of redacted criminal histories from the lot of them.

Ok, I'm convinced. Send in the lynch mob! /s

Clowns.

 

[SeltzerMist]

Ironic.

More vague nonsense from the guy who dips out every time their stance gets pressed

 

[BlueFox gui]

so the elite is full of rapist pedophiles, wow, who would've guessed?
and there's people defending said rapist pedophiles WOW WHAT so you like that sort of stuff huh?

 

[urherenow]

so the elite is full of rapist pedophiles, wow, who would've guessed?
and there's people defending said rapist pedophiles WOW WHAT so you like that sort of stuff huh?

Well, the left spends all day trying to prevent ICE agents from arresting pedos, so there's that.
Then there's what Newsome signed into law in California, in the name of equality: https://www.liberty.edu/champion/20...california-law-protecting-pedophilia-is-vile/

But to be clear, I'll be right in line to condemn Trump when I see actual proof. One look at this very thread should tell you that you can't trust a tip line. And apparently the people who investigated those tips didn't find anything either. But here we are.

 

[SeltzerMist]

Well, the left spends all day trying to prevent ICE agents from arresting pedos, so there's that.
Then there's what Newsome signed into law in California, in the name of equality: https://www.liberty.edu/champion/20...california-law-protecting-pedophilia-is-vile/

But to be clear, I'll be right in line to condemn Trump when I see actual proof. One look at this very thread should tell you that you can't trust a tip line. And apparently the people who investigated those tips didn't find anything either. But here we are.

Whataboutism and deflection

 

[urherenow]

Whataboutism and deflection

Yea, I know. Your favorite words. Broken record.

Kind of wish there were more details in these documents, considering the emails are from August of last year. Like... maybe the dates of these tips?

 

[SeltzerMist]

Yea, I know. Your favorite words. Broken record.

No, it's what you're doing in response to sexual assault and pedophilia and it makes you look bad. Especially considering you believed the MS13 tattoo photoshop.

Hope this clarifies things for your MAGA brain.

 

[urherenow]

No, it's what you're doing in response to sexual assault and pedophilia and it makes you look bad. Especially considering you believed the MS13 tattoo photoshop.

Hope this clarifies things for your MAGA brain.

Wrong. It's my response to dumshit, unfounded accusations against someone. A couple of emails that list a few things called into a tip line, that resulted in a nothingburger on all counts, isn't anything to get excited over. Especially when dickheads like you can just as easily call that tip line.

 

[titan_tim]

A good breakdown of some of the insanity that has come out of the new batch. This is evidence in the form of actual emails sent by the perpetrators. Bill Gates plotting to secretly give his wife STDs antibiotics after he got infected screwing Russian prostitutes is pretty damning. Same with Musk practically begging g to go to pedo island after it was already known Epstein was a pedo.

 

[SeltzerMist]

Wrong. It's my response to dumshit, unfounded accusations against someone. A couple of emails that list a few things called into a tip line, that resulted in a nothingburger on all counts, isn't anything to get excited over. Especially when dickheads like you can just as easily call that tip line.

Oh got it you complained about being called out for your whataboutism and deflection because you don't know what those things even are.

That's on track for you.

 

[Nakamichi]

Where theres smoke, theres fire,
but you cant convince some people, you just cant.
Michael Jackson is still idolized, so are Kelsey Grammer, Mick Jagger, David Bowie, Isaac Asimov. etc etc

The rich and powerful can and always will be able to do whatever they want and escape judgment, because people will NEVER have enough proof, ever.

 

[The Catboy]

Incorrect.

"sourced accusations", i.e. who is the alleged victim that made the accusation? Not which govt. agency had a document with the complaint typed out on it. (duh)

I also asked about when these complaints were received.

And it was ironic, because there is no "proof" for any of the claims at the OP, but Seltzer was demanding proof of another claim (i.e. the daycare fraud thing).

Redacting the victims names is necessary for their safety. We know Trump supporter will harass, stalk, and most likely harm the victims if their names were released. Plus, releasing their names would create a tainted jury. Not sure why “when” is important but I am guessing it’s just going to be some conspiracy about how this ties back to framing Trump.

It's fun watching the vultures. None of them even know what they're looking at, but they're salivating.

First and foremost, the documents seem to be scanned in reverse order, so start from the bottom.

1) You have an unknown (redacted) party, replying to another unknown (redacted) party, with a list of people, who supposedly called a tip line. Specifically ones that mention Trump. With a disclaimer that a number of these "tips" are not first-party.

2) You have a list of what these tips were, with notable names mentioned

3) (at the top) You have results of somebody trying to corroborate anything at all from these tips.

What did they get?

No contact info
Incorrect contact info
A dead person
Someone who was so doped up, that they didn't even know what was real
Someone who says there is video, but never sent a video
Someone who said they had email proof, and never sent an email

and a bunch of redacted criminal histories from the lot of them.

Ok, I'm convinced. Send in the lynch mob! /s

Clowns.

Peak mental gymnastics

 

[Nakamichi]

Redacting the victims names is necessary for their safety. We know Trump supporter will harass, stalk, and most likely harm the victims if their names were released. Plus, releasing their names would create a tainted jury.


Peak mental gymnastics

You think its true?
couldnt even read all of it.
that is..... rough, insanely rough.

 

[Reualed]

It's fun watching the vultures. None of them even know what they're looking at, but they're salivating.

First and foremost, the documents seem to be scanned in reverse order, so start from the bottom.

1) You have an unknown (redacted) party, replying to another unknown (redacted) party, with a list of people, who supposedly called a tip line. Specifically ones that mention Trump. With a disclaimer that a number of these "tips" are not first-party.

2) You have a list of what these tips were, with notable names mentioned

3) (at the top) You have results of somebody trying to corroborate anything at all from these tips.

What did they get?

No contact info
Incorrect contact info
A dead person
Someone who was so doped up, that they didn't even know what was real
Someone who says there is video, but never sent a video
Someone who said they had email proof, and never sent an email

and a bunch of redacted criminal histories from the lot of them.

Ok, I'm convinced. Send in the lynch mob! /s

Clowns.

sooooo...
Let's see here.
Trump: the Epstein files are real
Trump: Epstein files are real and has Democrats
Trump and co: it's on my desk ready to be sent out.
Radio silence on actual release
Trump: it's a Democrat hoax.

Trump supporter: yes leader!

REPUBLICAN controlled Congress attempts to force a release. It gets released By TRUMP's admin full of Trump loyalists.

Has damning things to say about Trump and just about every one else we should come to expect.

Trump supporter: "well you can't actually prove that dear leader is a pedo"

Despite it fucking being in the goddamn epstien files.

 

[Nakamichi]

sooooo...
Let's see here.
Trump: the Epstein files are real
Trump: Epstein files are real and has Democrats
Trump and co: it's on my desk ready to be sent out.
Radio silence on actual release
Trump: it's a Democrat hoax.

Trump supporter: yes leader!

REPUBLICAN controlled Congress attempts to force a release. It gets released By TRUMP's admin full of Trump loyalists.

Has damning things to say about Trump and just about every one else we should come to expect.

Trump supporter: "well you can't actually prove that dear leader is a pedo"

Despite it fucking being in the goddamn epstien files.

Some people still praise god damn Hitler nearly 100 years later, after he failed and turned the entire planet into a battlefield.
Some people just dont want to see it, i think. The Truth. i suppose.

 

[Hanafuda]

Redacting the victims names is necessary for their safety. We know Trump supporter will harass, stalk, and most likely harm the victims if their names were released. Plus, releasing their names would create a tainted jury. Not sure why “when” is important but I am guessing it’s just going to be some conspiracy about how this ties back to framing Trump.


Peak mental gymnastics

The accusations at OP are anonymous complaints submitted to an online tipline site. There are no "victim" names to redact because there are no "victim" names. There may be tons of damning evidence in yesterday's dump, but what's posted at the OP is fucking nothing. Especially if they are anonymous complaints received from after the left started hating Donald Trump.

 

[The Catboy]

You think its true?
couldnt even read all of it.
that is..... rough, insanely rough.

I am not sure what you mean by that. If you mean do I believe the claims of rich pedos including Trump, Bill Clinton, and other wealthy people are monsters, yes I do believe that is the case. Not just because of the OP but because of the actual years of reports from victims. Didn’t read? I sure did, I just respond according to what I believe is worth responding to. People asking for sources on who made these claims or when they were made either don’t understand the purpose of protecting victims or want the victims to be harmed further or “discredited” before any potential legal action. Plus, it’s just straight up armchair lawyering.

Post automatically merged: Jan 31, 2026

The accusations at OP are anonymous complaints submitted to an online tipline site. There are no "victim" names to redact because there are no "victim" names. There may be tons of damning evidence in yesterday's dump, but what's posted at the OP is fucking nothing. Especially if they are anonymous complaints received from after the left started hating Donald Trump.

Okay, so it is just the idea of people framing Trump because Left Bad™. I will agree that OP should include an actual proper source, however, the full source has been provided to you already in this thread.

You can find it here if you're questioning its source:
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 10/EFTA01660679.pdf

They re-enabled access to the document after taking it down earlier.

For those curious-
The copy available earlier and the one available now (2026/01/30 10:40pm-UTC) are the same, byte-for-byte in a hex editor.
Both produce CRC32: F8AAB2B5

So this has been an irrelevant issue for a hot minute now.

 

[Nakamichi]

I am not sure what you mean by that. If you mean do I believe the claims of rich pedos including Trump, Bill Clinton, and other wealthy people are monsters, yes I do believe that is the case. Not just because of the OP but because of the actual years of reports from victims. Didn’t read? I sure did, I just respond according to what I believe is worth responding to. People asking for sources on who made these claims or when they were made either don’t understand the purpose of protecting victims or want the victims to be harmed further or “discredited” before any potential legal action. Plus, it’s just straight up armchair lawyering.

no, i mean the specific text quoted in the original post.
turned my stomach, what i read that is.
not even sure how to feel right now

 

[The Catboy]

no, i mean the specific text quoted in the original post.
turned my stomach, what i read that is.
not even sure how to feel right now

Ah, apologies for making assumptions. Yeah, it’s awful. These monsters deserve the chair.