Hallo.
I was thinking really hard about the launch model PS3 just now, and it occurred to me that I've always heard the PS2 BC described as "A PS2 shoved inside the PS3". Now, the PS3 is huge, and maybe huge enough to fit both a PS2 Slim (wow those are tiny) and a whole PS3 inside, but I assume Sony still did some amount of miniaturization. Is it like the PS2 on an SOC? And, say if it were, couldn't that be used to make a portable? I know it'd be a sin to sacrifice a launch PS3 for a PS2 portable, but what if?
I'm just kinda throwing stuff out there right now. Basically, if the backwards compatibility of a system relies on an SOC (which my understanding is just one chip), wouldn't that make portibalization of one chip relatively easy compared to miniaturization of multiple chips?
Anyway. Maybe I'm just crazy (lol) but throw your thoughts in, though I'm probably totally off base.
I was thinking really hard about the launch model PS3 just now, and it occurred to me that I've always heard the PS2 BC described as "A PS2 shoved inside the PS3". Now, the PS3 is huge, and maybe huge enough to fit both a PS2 Slim (wow those are tiny) and a whole PS3 inside, but I assume Sony still did some amount of miniaturization. Is it like the PS2 on an SOC? And, say if it were, couldn't that be used to make a portable? I know it'd be a sin to sacrifice a launch PS3 for a PS2 portable, but what if?
I'm just kinda throwing stuff out there right now. Basically, if the backwards compatibility of a system relies on an SOC (which my understanding is just one chip), wouldn't that make portibalization of one chip relatively easy compared to miniaturization of multiple chips?
Anyway. Maybe I'm just crazy (lol) but throw your thoughts in, though I'm probably totally off base.








