I think Trump is Dying

  • Thread starter Thread starter titan_tim
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 11,016
  • Replies Replies 279
  • Likes Likes 2
  • Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions. Saying NO to fascists/nazis - if you are one of those, you are not welcome here

When do you think he'll croak?

  • I give it a month.

    Votes: 5 6.0%
  • He won't make it to 2026.

    Votes: 21 25.0%
  • He won't make it past his term.

    Votes: 33 39.3%
  • It's 4D Chess to make it look like he's dying to distract from Epstein.

    Votes: 25 29.8%

  • Total voters
    84
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh fuck off already Heavy, you're not fooling anyone
So was heavy maga? I literally said Trump is likely in the Epstein files, how is that maga?

Also if you think I'm not fooling anyone stop replying to me? You are the one complaining that I was ignoring you, maybe I should if you are going to be rude like this.
 
There was so much prep and coordination that went into that months beforehand. Trump getting knocked off would not have nearly the same effect, nor would there be the lack of law enforcement should something begin to form.
I'm confused by the rhetoric here, so right wingers are dangerous and capable of violence at a moments notice, but they're also all fat keyword warriors who won't do anything if their candidate gets assassinated?

You live in a weird world.
 
So was heavy maga? I literally said Trump is likely in the Epstein files, how is that maga?

Also if you think I'm not fooling anyone stop replying to me? You are the one complaining that I was ignoring you, maybe I should if you are going to be rude like this.

Believe what you want but this is getting tiresome so I will start ignoring this crazy talk.

Yet, here you are, not ignoring this "crazy talk". It's just like I said before. You made this account to engage in this, Heavy, and so you continue to do so after saying you'd ignore it.
Post automatically merged:

I'm confused by the rhetoric here, so right wingers are dangerous and capable of violence at a moments notice, but they're also all fat keyword warriors who won't do anything if their candidate gets assassinated?

You live in a weird world.
Months of planning is a moment's notice? How odd....
Post automatically merged:

That is sad because a lot of people actually living under a dictatorship wish getting rid of them was as easy as... voting?
Trump wants to take that away as well.
 
That is sad because a lot of people actually living under a dictatorship wish getting rid of them was as easy as... voting?
what so dictator in training appeases you more?
Post automatically merged:

look I'm calling trump for what he is a dictator (oddly i feel he's not too stupid cause if if goes full bllown autocrat secret service poof gone military poof gone they did not sign up for obeying a hitler wannabe trust me changing the government type like Sid Mierer's civilization in cheat mode has it's dowside, at least he has some brain cells to relize that
 
Last edited by chrisrlink,
  • Like
Reactions: Xzi
Sometimes I wonder what would leftists do if an actual dictator took over America, kind of crazy. And what are they going to do with the next candidate? Another dictator? And the next one? Another one too? At some point they look goofy, but if they say "ok only Trump was a dictator this one is fine", they just lose a lot of energy coming into the next election. You have locked yourself into a narrative box that it's not easy to get out of, boy who cried wolf.
 
Reminder everyone, let's not feed the troll. It's obvious, he doesn't have any morals or any functioning reasoning. Let him rot without any interaction
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOnYa and Xzi
Because you're too damn dumb and lazy to read the FAQ. You have no clue what the context is, and are making a complete fool of yourself. I'm giving a chuckle too. Not with you, but at you.
So let me get this straight..... because the FAQ on their own website says that putting the constitution and declaration of independence isn't political, you'll gobble down that as absolute truth? I think you need to start using my avatar! I use it because it's an awesome sign. You need it because it fits.

So please, go on: What non-political context could there be for a religious book meant for the world need the founding documents of a country inserted into it?
 
I hate how the insurrection ammendment was worder (I mean it came after the civil war so i get it but they forgot the piece for "what if we become a dictatorship?" clause which should in theory null the punishment under a checklist of sorts iirc the ICC and treaties (Roman charter to be specific) does have guidelines on when a rebelion is lawful (like to topple a totalitarian regieme) these guidelines under the Intl law prevents carrying out punishment when order is restored
 
So let me get this straight..... because the FAQ on their own website says that putting the constitution and declaration of independence isn't political, you'll gobble down that as absolute truth? I think you need to start using my avatar! I use it because it's an awesome sign. You need it because it fits.

So please, go on: What non-political context could there be for a religious book meant for the world need the founding documents of a country inserted into it?
Laws were passed in those States requiring those things to be in a bible for schools. Teaching any bible at all in a public school is questionable, but that's not what we're talking about. The laws to teach the bible in schools were passed earlier. This company saw an opportunity to make money and went with it.

The REAL context is that none of the money went to a political campaign (which is what the FAQ makes perfectly clear, but I know you didn't bother reading it so...). Trump was going to use money from that to pay for the bullshit fines from New York, which were just overturned, by the way...
 
Laws were passed in those States requiring those things to be in a bible for schools. Teaching any bible at all in a public school is questionable, but that's not what we're talking about. The laws to teach the bible in schools were passed earlier. This company saw an opportunity to make money and went with it.
Unless they put every religious text in the classrooms, it is blatantly unconstitutional. I don't know how else to explain this to you.
The REAL context is that none of the money went to a political campaign (which is what the FAQ makes perfectly clear, but I know you didn't bother reading it so...). Trump was going to use money from that to pay for the bullshit fines from New York, which were just overturned, by the way...
So you're admitting that the money didn't go to a campaign, and went right into the pockets of the president? Illegal.
Also, they didn't overturn the verdict, they removed the fine. Still guilty of fraud. But, you skimmed over that part, didn't ya?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOnYa
Unless they put every religious text in the classrooms, it is blatantly unconstitutional. I don't know how else to explain this to you.

So you're admitting that the money didn't go to a campaign, and went right into the pockets of the president? Illegal.
Also, they didn't overturn the verdict, they removed the fine. Still guilty of fraud. But, you skimmed over that part, didn't ya?
How fucking unhinged are you? I'm not "admitting" shit. And I'm not defending the bibles in schools thing in the slightest. I'm just saying that people who say TRUMP made a bible and is selling it... are a bunch of morons. And Trump didn't have a goddamn thing to do with the schools thing, either. Again, direct your rhetoric towards the superintendent of that state. And whoever the numerous people in that state are, that passed this "law".

Serious question that will probably go over most of your heads: If Nike started selling shoes in a country that decided to outlaw modern shoes, should the people of that country prosecute Michael Jordan?
 
Last edited by urherenow,
You just said that the money didn't go to the campaign, but went to pay his bills. That is admitting personal profit. Did Trump personally make money from a government purchase? If your answer is "Yes", then it is illegal. Period.

As for it being labeled "Trumps" bible. It was sold by that singer and not getting any sales, then told Trump he'd give 20% for sales if he advertised it. If he didn't endorse it, it would be a paperweight. So like it or not, that's how endorsement licenses go. So get bent out of shape about it all you want, but it's the "Trump bible" in the eyes of the general public. I don't care either way. I just see it as an unconstitutional monstrosity and nothing more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xzi and BigOnYa
No they're not. They know the truth and repeat the lies anyway.
Why would you try to gaslight people about something so easy to verify? It's one of the very first results when you search for "Trump bible," and his face is all over the webpage. Of course he doesn't actually MAKE any of the garbage-quality merch he's promoted over the decades, but he still profits from it.
 
Why would you try to gaslight people about something so easy to verify? It's one of the very first results when you search for "Trump bible," and his face is all over the webpage. Of course he doesn't actually MAKE any of the garbage-quality merch he's promoted over the decades, but he still profits from it.

I would think it's of poor taste for a president who's following has a good chunk of "religious" people to collaborate and sell a
signed version of a Bible for 1k
https://godblesstheusabible.com/pro...ump-signature-edition-god-bless-the-usa-bible

And btw, the faq says that this are the only officially Trump endorsed Bibles, so take that as you will
https://godblesstheusabible.com/pages/faq

But I guess he has a pass because he didn't create the bibles with his own hands, my bad
 
Last edited by Deleted member 705600,
I would think it's of poor taste for a president who's following has a good chunk of "religious" people to collaborate and sell a
signed version of a the Bible for 1k
It would absolutely be considered sacrilegious if there were any real Christians left in the Republican party.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum