Last Seen Movie

  • Thread starter Thread starter JuanMena
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 234,228
  • Replies Replies 1,497
  • Likes Likes 5
Interstellar (2014) for the second time with my wife.
It's so good movie!!!
My wife saw it for the first time, i'm glad that she like it.

I saw Interstellar for the first time in a now closed IMAX theater. Not one of the more modern "Liemax" screens, but on an og gigantic 100 ft wide and I think 70-80+ ft tall IMAX screen. It was absolutely incredible.

The Life of Chuck. I dunno. I didn't think it was that great. 5/10. Not nearly half as good as other movies based on Steven Kings non-horror work. Doesn't have anything on Stand by Me, Green Mile, or Shawshank Redemption.
 
Last edited by Earthshine,
  • Like
Reactions: DaFixer
1755546636030.png

Shattered / Butterfly on a Wheel (2007)
I would have passed on this, but Pierce Brosnan's inclusion got my attention. There's not much to review about this movie without spoiling the details, so I'll just say it's a simple watch. If you like Pierce Brosnan, the 2000's, and Gerard Butler's American accent, you may get some entertainment out of this.

You want the real details? It's a very gentle thriller. The (US) title and poster are the most unnerving parts of the movie. It's not boring or unwatchable, but you won't want/need a rewatch. I cannot recall what makes the movie R, probably the cursing. Otherwise, it's closer to PG-13 than not. I appreciated it because I don't mind these types of lower-end thrillers, but I know most will find it passable at best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RustInPeace
Romy & Michele's High School Reunion - 90s as fuck comedy with a very loud, hit-filled soundtrack. It's a time capsule movie with some dated sensibilities and dialogue, but many members of the cast did a great job. Lisa Kudrow and Mira Sorvino had fantastic chemistry, kind of a Dumb & Dumber quality to them. The movie also takes some swings into surreal territory and has a very vivid sense of fashion. A major surprise for me, I didn't expect to laugh out loud so much from this.

LA Confidential - Still holds up. Absolutely fantastic casting as everyone was perfectly suited for their role. The movie's an excellent recreation and tribute to 50s noir films, down to the masculinity, the cinematography, the wardrobe, and the storytelling. I haven't watched Kevin Spacey in a movie since he's been exposed as a monster. So that's 8 years! I only revisited this movie because someone chose it for a watch party. I'm not keen on watching Kevin Spacey movies in my own time. It wasn't intended to watch 2 movies released in 1997, but what a lovely double feature.
 
1756232869754.png

Cliffhanger (1993)
I'm not sure how to judge this one. For how much schlock was present, it seemed to take itself somewhat seriously. I couldn't get really invested. The tension between Stallone's and Michael Rooker's characters had potential, but the script didn't do anything with it.

I do enjoy Stallone action movies, but I felt like this one was too stereotypical. John Lithgow's accent in the movie really helps personify that image. For all the effort put into the mountain locale and setpieces, it was hard to emotionally invest in the scenario and characters.

It was a great idea for an action movie, but the execution was lacking for me.
 
View attachment 524417
Cliffhanger (1993)
I'm not sure how to judge this one. For how much schlock was present, it seemed to take itself somewhat seriously. I couldn't get really invested. The tension between Stallone's and Michael Rooker's characters had potential, but the script didn't do anything with it.

I do enjoy Stallone action movies, but I felt like this one was too stereotypical. John Lithgow's accent in the movie really helps personify that image. For all the effort put into the mountain locale and setpieces, it was hard to emotionally invest in the scenario and characters.

It was a great idea for an action movie, but the execution was lacking for me.

I've seen it. Same reaction. :mellow:
 
A Working Man - It seemed like this was going to be another overly serious action movie directed by David Ayer and starring Jason Statham following The Beekeeper. The movie turned out be that and hilariously bad! There were some truly outrageous sequences and characters in this movie that make it entertaining. The Beekeeper is better on every other front. The acting is better, the action sequences are better, the story is more interesting. A Working Man is funnier, but significantly worse on every other craft. Bad acting, a disjointed story that felt like AI spitting out action scenarios and villainous factions, sloppy editing, stupid lines, stupid characters, and a huge moon. This should've got ragged on like War of the Worlds, but I understand why that's a generational type of bad movie. A Working Man is less offensive, but still worthy of ridicule.
 
A Working Man - It seemed like this was going to be another overly serious action movie directed by David Ayer and starring Jason Statham following The Beekeeper. The movie turned out be that and hilariously bad! There were some truly outrageous sequences and characters in this movie that make it entertaining. The Beekeeper is better on every other front. The acting is better, the action sequences are better, the story is more interesting. A Working Man is funnier, but significantly worse on every other craft. Bad acting, a disjointed story that felt like AI spitting out action scenarios and villainous factions, sloppy editing, stupid lines, stupid characters, and a huge moon. This should've got ragged on like War of the Worlds, but I understand why that's a generational type of bad movie. A Working Man is less offensive, but still worthy of ridicule.
I think it's interesting that you liked The Beekeeper better because I'm the opposite. I could turn my brain off for A Working Man. The Beekeeper had a much more serious tone and deeper storyline that was undermined by an overly sweary script. A Working Man felt more tame and focused in comparison (relatively). Both movies are equally ridiculous, but I'd argue that A Working Man's execution was sharper (still relatively).

For the record, I'm not trying to feud. I'd rather we disagree on this than other topics(tm).
 
Ghostwatch - Pretty unique and fun horror mockumentary that clearly inspired Interview with the Devil. It's too slow at first and the payoff is not that great, but the overall craft involved is very respectable.

Bullet in the Head - Another example of why Hong Kong John Woo was peak! This movie's very messy narratively and all over the place thematically. Sometimes it's the Deer Hunter, sometimes its Scarface, sometimes it's an allegory to
Tiananmen Square and other historical events, sometimes it's very poetic and hits upon the theme of friendship as A Better Tomorrow did. Many times its balls-to-the-wall John Woo action. The movie is amazing, does everything I want in a John Woo movie and even hit me in the feels. I was close to shedding a tear. It's also a movie where certain nitpicks come out after the viewing. Nonetheless, this was another Hong Kong masterpiece from John Woo. Very close in quality to A Better Tomorrow, which is still my favorite movie of his.
 
1756609609485.png

Into the Ashes (2019)

Like Shattered and Pierce Brosnan, I was interested in this one because of Frank Grillo. I found the movie to be a one-watch experience.

Despite the poster art, the movie is a slow-burn with an extraordinarily simple narrative. You'll piece together where the movie's going within the first half-hour or so. At one hour and thirty seven minutes, the movie takes its time. I mean, it really takes its time.

The script is otherworldly off-beat when it tries to be funny/charming, and it's melancholy and straightforward the rest of the time. For those that are curious, Frank Grillo is only in the movie for about 10 minutes. It was a nice surprise to see James Badge Dale among the cast. (Another case of 24 alumni popping in.) I do feel like the final conflict was rushed. It happens to be where the plot finds some glaring inconsistencies/contrivances.

I admit, I didn't shut it off. I held on to the end. It's not a film that'll offend you into turning it off. The slow burn will get you before anything else does. I would recommend this movie to those that enjoy a slow journey- no matter how simple-, but I wouldn't recommend it to action fans.
 
The One (2001) - I haven't seen this movie in about 20 years, but I'm glad I did. It'll make you feel like a teenager in the 2000's again.

It's very much a product of its time. The CGI is easy to spot, and the soundtrack is so 2000's. I'm pretty sure Tony Hawk Pro Skater track is featured. It was nice to see some familiar faces in there, including Jason Statham. I'm a fan of James Morrison for his work in 24, so it was nice to see him show up here. I recommend giving the movie a watch, especially if you haven't seen it in a few decades. Turn your brain off, and enjoy the ride.

UU WAH'AH'AH'AH
yea watched this as well as other Jet Lee flicks atleast a half a dozen times back then and i enjoyed them quite a bit. one that comes to mind is the one with dmx, "romeo must die", they all good imo tho i haven't seen any of them for atleast a decade, might revisit them at some point, so thanks for reminding me of Jet Lee!
Nightcrawler - I first watched this movie 10 years ago and was eager to revisit it. It holds up big time. I was so tense and anxious at many parts in the movie, while also falling in love with the cinematography and being absolutely captivated by Jake Gyllenhaal's performance. This is the best Jake Gyllenhaal performance in my opinion, his performance is so amazing that at times, I forgot about how amazingly photographed the movie was and how the whole vibe of the movie is sleazy, lurid, yet intoxicating. A very small cast, but great performances from a young Riz Ahmed, another sleazy guy played perfectly by Bill Paxton, and a very sexy Rene Russo. It really isn't often that a movie depicts a sexy cougar and does so unlike many other movies. I could gush about this movie for a long time. I think I love it even more the 2nd time. It also works as a spiritual successor to Collateral inasmuch that it's an LA movie that showcases how great filming on digital can be. Over 10 years later, the visuals still hold up. The mix of digital and film is absolutely seamless. Very shocking and disturbing images, it's lowkey gory and violent. Yeah, I absolutely love this movie. An easy 10/10.
i echo almost most of what you said here, Gyllenhaal been on a roll back in 2013-14, with Prisoners (another masterclass of cinema) and Enemy (a bit underrated imo). after loving the aforementioned 2, was looking forward to Nightcrawler when it was first shown, and it's grown to be abit of comfort movie for me. it's a shame that he didn't do anything that significant after this Southpaw was meh and the others that followed as well, thriller mysteries were his thing imho
A Working Man - It seemed like this was going to be another overly serious action movie directed by David Ayer and starring Jason Statham following The Beekeeper. The movie turned out be that and hilariously bad! There were some truly outrageous sequences and characters in this movie that make it entertaining. The Beekeeper is better on every other front. The acting is better, the action sequences are better, the story is more interesting. A Working Man is funnier, but significantly worse on every other craft. Bad acting, a disjointed story that felt like AI spitting out action scenarios and villainous factions, sloppy editing, stupid lines, stupid characters, and a huge moon. This should've got ragged on like War of the Worlds, but I understand why that's a generational type of bad movie. A Working Man is less offensive, but still worthy of ridicule.
Typical Jason Statham action flick, while i haven't seen any of his for atleast a decade, the last i watched was the Beekeeper and thought it was very dated. if somebody tells you it was released sometime in the 00/10's? you def won't notice as it fits right in with his other action flicks in that time period. how are these types of movies still being made? i guess there's still niche demand for them, people who just can't get enough of this stuff, but im def not one of them.. this comes from someone who likes John Wick
 
1757109853310.png

Eagle Eye (2008)
I'm always looking for lesser-known action/adventure/thriller movies with good production values. Eagle Eye is one of those movies, and it is a decent watch. Good pace, simple and clean(tm) execution, and nice setpieces. Back in the day, I felt that Shia LaBeouf was everywhere. Now that that era of oversaturation has passed, I can really appreciate works like these, and I feel like he did a fine job with this movie. Plus, Rosario Dawson's in this, so fans of Netflix's Disney's Marvel's Daredevil can appreciate a familiar face.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RustInPeace
The Secret Life of Walter Mitty - Surprisingly charming with lovely cinematography and Ben Stiller delivering another likable and somewhat relatable character. The daydream moments were funny and felt like parodies of certain things, such as Taken-style action movies, superhero movies, and The Curious Case of Benjamin Button! A lot of these could've passed for trailers at the start of Tropic Thunder. The soundtrack really dates the movie, stomp clap shit that was so early 2010s. Apart from that, it was a delightful viewing.

In the Mood for Love - Finally watched this for the first time. It's also my first Wong Kar-wai movie. Letterboxd got this right, this was a very exquisite movie. The storytelling is very smart, the the cinematography cycles from being lush and voyeuristic, the soundtrack is lovely, and this movie's fascination with red rubbed off on me big time. Tony Leung and Maggie Cheung were excellent, their relationship was somehow romantically platonic, or platonically romantic? It was special, that's for sure. I knew this movie was very influential. I see how it inspired a certain sequence in Everything Everywhere All At Once, I could see how its visual flair and some of the storytelling inspired Past Lives. I also get some European vibes to the movie that blend well with the Hong Kong nature of it. Hell, how the main characters dress truly represent the movie, especially the dresses Maggie Cheung wore. Very regal with appealing patterns and motifs. It also makes smoking cigarettes look cool.
 
Weapons - Very well-crafted horror/mystery/dark comedy. It fired on all cylinders and is a major step up from writer/director Zach Cregger's previous film, Barbarian. This one has more replay value and has a batshit insane ending! The build is great, the payoff is fantastic. A strong ensemble cast where everyone did a great job. The showstealer was Amy Madigan as Gladys. Holy crap, I got some Longlegs vibes from her, as well as just being a very unsettling woman to look at. The gore is great, the music is very nice, he craft all around is impressive. This feels a lot bigger than Barbarian. Still a little rough around the edges in terms of narrative, but this is easily one of the best films of the year. Definitely lived up to the hype.

Hell Comes to Frogtown - This starred Rowdy Roddy Piper and came out the same year as They Live. They Live is far better than this. A major improvement in acting for Piper, which makes me think this was shot a while before They Live because Piper's acting in this is so bad funny! It's a very tongue in cheek 80s B-movie that's extremely perverted with scenes that would not fly today. There's one scene in here that would get the same treatment as the scene in Revenge of the Nerds that's pretty much sexual assault. Anyway, the movie features anthropomorphic frogs who looked very cheap, They looked like monsters in a Power Rangers episode with mouth movements like sock puppets and costumes that clearly cover up the actors so that you don't see that the only makeup they wear is on their head. Anyway, I was shocked and laughed a lot in the first 30 minutes, but then the movie lost some steam, strangely when they made it to Frogtown and you finally see the mutant frogs. The action was very PG-13, the raunchiness never hit the heights of the first 30 minutes, and the cheapness of the film seemed to have compromised the quality a lot. Still, it's a decent enough B-movie that doesn't overstay its welcome, it's only 86 minutes.

Bloody Muscle Body Builder in Hell - A long and goofy title for a very short movie! It's 63 minutes long, but it has a lot of over-the-top gore and stopmotion. It's incredibly cheap, it looks and sounds like it was shot on video. A very tiny cast consisting of only a handful of actors, one of them is also the writer and director. It's a very unserious but lovable passion project. It's also the Japanese Evil Dead. Loads of references and story beats from the first 2 Evil Dead movies are in this movie. The hero of the movie is definitely inspired by Bruce Campbell, even down to using the famous "Groovy" line. It's very comedic, more on the Evil Dead 2 side than the first one. It's a lot of fun and certainly doesn't overstay its welcome.

Infernal Affairs - Long overdue first-time viewing here. I knew this was what Martin Scorsese remade into The Departed. I was shocked to see how much of The Departed is taken from this! I didn't think all the major plot points in Infernal Affairs were used for The Departed, including the shocking elevator scene! The Departed more or less tied up all the loose ends and made sure the bad guy loses. Infernal Affairs didn't do that, which explains why there's a trilogy. I certainly want to see the 2nd and 3rd movies. I love The Departed, but after just 1 viewing, I think Infernal Affairs is better. That might be too obvious to say, original over remake, but the remake was done by one of the greatest filmmakers of all time. Despite that, one thing I can never let slide with The Departed is that final shot! That final shot did not age well at all. I don't think it even looked good back in 2006. Infernal Affairs is slick, and stylistically consistent from start to finish. It also feels a lot more rootsy and philosophical, with allusions to Buddhism. Also, Triad people are more legit than the Boston Irish mob. So yeah, everything that was so good in The Departed is present here, along with two incredible lead acting performances by Andy Lau and Tony Leung. I watched 3 Tony Leung movies this month and I just love the man now. Despite knowing The Departed so well, I was wrapped up in this movie and even was shocked a few times, even though The Departed used those same shocking moments! That's a real sign of quality.
 
Predator - This is the 100th movie I watched in 2025. Classic Hollywood action movie. I chose this for an easy viewing experience. It still holds up. The craft is very impressive. That includes the immersive sound design, the tremendous score from Alan Silvestri, and the design for the Predator. The on-location shooting was great and John McTiernan's directing was key to the movie's success. The overall action is strong and the suspense is intense. The cast was very entertaining. Arnie was in his peak here, Carl Weathers was charismatic and fun to watch, Jesse Ventura was amusing, Sonny Landham was good, Shane Black was a little funny. Richard Chaves was ok. The more I watch the movie, the more I'm amazed by Bill Duke, I think he gave the best acting performance in the movie. Extremely varied in his delivery where he's soft-spoken at times, unhinged in others. The movie has a lot of great one liners and bits of dialogue that are unforgettable. "Stick around," "Get to the choppa," If it bleeds, we can kill it!" I eat all that up. The epic handshake between Arnie and Carl Weathers, peak cinema! Predator never gets old, it's true lightning in a bottle.

Death to Smoochy - Kind of a dark comedy, but it ended up feeling kind of light. This was a very unique movie with a bunch of tones. Some of the humor doesn't hold up, while certain things age so weirdly. For example, Edward Norton's character essentially gets canceled for something that would be embraced out in the open today! He was hated for his empathy, which is so goofy back then, but today?! That's a legit reason to hate someone according to a certain demographic. The movie also goes so hard on certain areas of craft. The set design is pretty wild, the costume design is pretty inspired, the cinematography was just playfully random and unhinged at times. Dutch angles and other quirky camera shots ruled this movie. Danny DeVito directed this and it shows. The movie also features a lot of on-location shooting in NYC, which might explain why the budget was $50 million. It is not cheap to shoot in NYC and this movie took advantage of that. The cast is also rather stacked with Robin Williams, Edward Norton, Catherine Keener, Danny DeVito, and even Jon Stewart! Ed Norton's such a surprise because this was during a time where he was very self-serious. Strangely, he fits so well in the movie. The writing and directing makes him so goofy, but the man's acting makes the character a straight man of sorts. It's such an fascinating dichotomy. This movie has "cult" written all over it. It's no surprise it was a box office bomb, there wasn't anything like it. Even today, this still feels unique. I have a lot of respect for the movie because of that. Not everything works. The movie's pacing was wildly fast, but there were things that could've been cut out, like a few Robin Williams' segments because his arc in the movie gets a little repetitive. As much as I love Robin Williams, some of his improv went on too long. The movie's an acquired taste. It's so exaggerated that someone will either be annoyed by it, or hooked. I was hooked. Ultimately, I really like the movie. It was a strong showcase of Danny DeVito as a director. Part of me wonders if he was inspired by Tim Burton because some of the craft in this would fit in a Burton movie.

Night of the Lepus - A 70s movie where people are are victimized by mutant rabbit! Big ones...I think. The movie's pretty inconsistent in capturing the size of these rabbits. It also doesn't help that the rabbits are clearly running through miniature sets. The movie did a poor job with perspective. This is a sloppy film overall, which a lot of bad and unimpressive acting, editing that got worse toward the end, with so many quick cuts, you'd think it's a Michael Bay movie. The MVPs of the movie were the rabbits. The humans just sucked. This is definitely a "so bad it's good" movie. It does get repeititve, moves too slow at times, and ADR is painfully obvious, But it gives just enough laughs to where it's worth recommending.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaFixer

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum