Hmm I just tried myself and ZL and ZL stay pressed for me? I tested Rayman and crawled around on the floor fineHi everyone,
I’m running the latest Wii U WIP Aroma build of RetroArch with the PCSX-ReArmed core (I haven’t tested the Tiramisu version), and I’ve run into a weird issue: any PS1 title that requires me to hold R2 (ZR on the GamePad) only ever sees a single press—even if I keep ZR held down.
So far I’ve tried:
- verifying the “Menu Toggle” hotkey wasn’t still mapped to ZR
- switching Quick Menu → Controls → Port 1 Controls → Device Type between Standard and DualShock
- disabling both Multitap 1 and Multitap 2 in the core options
Nothing changes: ZR still only fires one digital “press” event instead of remaining active.
Has anyone encountered this on Wii U Aroma? Is there a way to force ZR to act as an analog R2 axis for PCSX-ReArmed, or any other workaround to get a continuous hold signal? Any help would be greatly appreciated!
I haven't heard of this issue before. Does this happen with other Cores? if not I would suggest deleting any Core config files you have relating to Pcsx_Rearmed.
Post automatically merged:
I understand it can be awkward for those who don't know what Core name relates to what system, but if your not sure you can always load the Core your not sure about and check Information/Core Information to check what systems the core can EmulateHi Ploggy, is this the px68k_libretro.zip for Tiramisu you've given or the new compile for Retroarch Aroma?
Thanks for all ^^
Was wondering, why do the Devs never gives PROPER emulation named core related to the console? For example now, everybody now picodrive's core (well almost everyone but...Finally sure it's NOT the case) is for emulation of sega games, but
Every cores should be PROPERLY labeled ike this for exemple:
- AMIGA computer (PUAE), not just "PUAE
- C64 Computer (FRODO)
- PS2 console (Play!) and NOT JUST PUAElibreto or FRODOlibreto cores.....ETC
Some core are even WRONG, for example "Beetle PSX"....Just to Say PSX console exists and it's NOT the PS1 ^^
- Why not position the best core by order for each machine?
Easyness should be the word spread. why on earth didn't they labeled SEGAcores lie Segacores instead of Picodrive, for easyness! (mr Snake could you think of that?) Do they labeled "Vinegar core"s on their bottle containing pickles at home??
Do they put the words "making my bloody system work or maybe cutting the energy" instead of an "on/off" button?
For example, in this thread, I read a poor guy searching for a core for master system and he didn't find it of course we knew it was picodrive but why simplify the thing....Just saying, this defies Logicc...Are they against mr Spock? if they don't understand this logic, maybe asking a 8 years child would help in order to make Retroarch more ergonomic, a true really easy scan for rom directory is clearly NECESSARY with automatic association to the best core (in general). Seems even in a future version, except if I begin kicking the anthill against retrograde ideas.










