Nintendo's crusade against emulators continues, with a serious lawsuit being filed against a Twitch streamer who continually played and livestreamed footage of leaked copies of Nintendo Switch games. A copy of the legal proceedings, acquired by news site TorrentFreak, details five different charges pressed to one Jesse Keighin, who uses the handle EveryGameGuru. Keighin had multiple channels and outlets where they were posting videos and streams of gameplay from at least ten Switch titles, all of which had been leaked and made available online prior to their release dates.

These charges are serious, and go beyond just streaming the games, as well.

Defendant is a recidivist pirate who has obtained and streamed Nintendo’s leaked games on multiple occasions. Leaked games (sometimes referred to as ‘prerelease games’) are copyrighted video games which Nintendo has not yet publicly released.

Since these games were not officially released at the time of the footage being taken, Nintendo alleges that these copies that Keighin was playing were pirated, and thus obtained illegally. Instructions on how to find the NSP/XCI files of leaked games were included in the streams, which would also mean the facilitation of piracy. On top of that, both Yuzu and Ryujinx have ended development, rendering the emulators "illegal software", and thus another crime. Continuing on, promoting illegal circumvention tools is a violation. Finally, distributing the prod.keys file allowing for running these pre-release leaks is the final charge, totaling the offenses at five.

For the first two charges, Nintendo is seeking $150,000 in damages for each instance of copyright infringement, and the third through fifth charges are fined at $2,500 per violation, per crime. In total, Nintendo is seeking a $2.4 million dollar settlement altogether.

Source

 

[chrisrlink]

I think it is easier for Nintendo to pursue the pirate at civil court rather than ask FBI to issue the criminal charge and face at criminal court, so criminal courts are overwhelmed with heavy caseloads and if DA is uninterested, so they could throw criminal charge out. In civil court, it is streamer vs. Nintendo.

one thnig is criminal case is more lucrative cause the accused can't declare bankruptcy and jus vacate the fines (same thing Kongnutz did) on the other hand the federal carges and subsiquent fines MUST be payed by Gary bowser bankruptcy won't save him

 

[samcambolt270]

one thnig is criminal case is more lucrative cause the accused can't declare bankruptcy and jus vacate the fines (same thing Kongnutz did) on the other hand the federal carges and subsiquent fines MUST be payed by Gary bowser bankruptcy won't save him

While piracy is both civil and criminal, the criminal portion provides absolutely no damages. You can't just call up the fbi and say "they streamed my game that they downloaded illegally" and get damages out of it. If you were arrested for piracy, you would be fined by the state and your fines would go to them. While a court can demand reparations, those reparations are civil and bankruptcy works just the same. It is only state fines that bankruptcy cannot resolve.

 

[Moe87]

one thnig is criminal case is more lucrative cause the accused can't declare bankruptcy and jus vacate the fines (same thing Kongnutz did) on the other hand the federal carges and subsiquent fines MUST be payed by Gary bowser bankruptcy won't save him

That would require DA willing to prosecute the accuser and Nintendo is fortunate to have FBI and DA on their back to prosecute Gary bowser and threw him in prison, and make to pay fine that cannot be discharged in bankruptcy court.

As for Kongnutz's case, it would be wake up call to not stream pirated content to public again, even court cost could be discharged in bankruptcy and if he is doing it again, it could escalate to become a criminal case, depends on FBI and DA mood.

 

[CMDreamer]

​

Nintendo's crusade against emulators continues [...]

I'd say this statement is very inaccurate, if we consider the title of this thread.

 

[Jayinem]

I see loads of videos of the leaked games being played, whys this person so special??

Bad timing/luck.

 

[QuestionEmulation]

This idiot could cause an event to where a slippery slope occurs with streamers playing Nintendo games period. Old or new. We know they'd do it, given the chance.

 

[DeadSkullzJr]

On one hand, you have to be pretty stupid to think you can get away with streaming gameplay of video games that aren't out yet. You are absolutely in the wrong for doing something like that, that's a step above kissing and telling that you pirate, that's just flaunting it carelessly and recklessly. In which case, whatever negative consequences you face is your fault, one should have been more responsible and wise. Especially considering that everyone knows the drill by now on how the legal system works with piracy in most instances.

On the other hand, 2.4 million is quite an excessive amount to be charging, but then again, it doesn't surprise me because even stuff like music and movies have hefty consequences financially speaking per pirated copy too, some much more than others. Now I can't assume exact specifics of the cost of damages for these things considering video games, movies, music, etc. all vary drastically in their ranges, and I know the market is much bigger than other categories for these sorts of goods. What's excessive to me could very well be a staple amount in the legal system for all I know, or it may not be, I haven't looked that deep. Regardless, it's quite a lot of money to be demanding for damages. Nintendo's legal department is definitely trying to make an example out of this streamer for doing what they did. Can't say I agree with the amount being charged unless I'm provided with information that justifies it, but I don't blame the legal team going after the streamer for obvious reasons.

 

[MysticStarlight]

Nintendo is right this time. If there were instructions on how to find the rom, then yeah the streamer 100% pirated them.

 

[YoureALoser]

Nintendo really has no leg to stand on here when it comes to most of these charges. No proof of piracy. Streaming a game before it releases is not proof of piracy & is not illegal. If retailers decide to release games before their official release date that is on the retailer not the customer. Companies like Nintendo need to learn that their policy, EULA, TOS etc. are NOT law.

 

[ftjiso]

if you gonna stream or upload a playthrough of a game that CLEARRLY shows "save state saved" or something similar you kinda deserve getting sued

 

[DM9]

What's with people today, seriously your ruining it for everyone first emulators now this s*** stop your freaking broadcasting and the fact people link themselves personally to their accounts and think they can make money off it is beyond moronic .. it will not end well this will not be about money they will put this numbnut in prison that's where this is going

 

[codezer0]

If there is a company that does not deserve to have its own legal team, it is Nintendo.

This kind of bold faced arrogance is the reason no post war treaty was EVER going to allow Japan to re-militarize after the first world wars. If not the disney plus thing, i had my money on nintendo putting eula terms that allowed them to legally kill someone.

 

[DeadSkullzJr]

Nintendo really has no leg to stand on here when it comes to most of these charges. No proof of piracy. Streaming a game before it releases is not proof of piracy & is not illegal. If retailers decide to release games before their official release date that is on the retailer not the customer. Companies like Nintendo need to learn that their policy, EULA, TOS etc. are NOT law.

That logic is flawed though, because if we assume one person got a retail copy earlier and streamed the contents before release like this person did, then that would mean we would also have to assume every other person who got access to the game early and streamed the contents before release also got an early retail copy. Based on this logic, Nintendo should let every person who does this slide on by because we would have to automatically assume it's the fault of whichever retailer they got the game from every time. It doesn't work that way though, even people who get review copies of video games are restricted to recording a certain amount of time of gameplay. It's pretty obvious that people shouldn't be getting access to contents before their street date. Based on the article, it mentions that the steamer was being dealt with by the services being used at the request of Nintendo, and if the date is anything to go by, it mentions October 24th, that's two weeks ago, the math doesn't add up quite nicely to result in this scenario being more innocent.

Let's think about it, is it possible that someone got a retail copy two weeks ahead of schedule, it's possible, very stupid of the retailer to be selling that early, but possible, but the odds of people getting their hands on retail copies early over pirating the leaked copy of the game and playing it early is statistically slimmer, because there is no way that many retailers are messing up that badly that so many people are accessing the game in mass. The reality is, an employee stole a copy from the stock provided, took that copy home, dumped it with a hacked switch, and leaked it online. Tons of people downloaded the game and played it, many have talked about it too. Do I believe this steamer had a retail copy, nope, the odds don't fit the bill or the timeframe of which the game was accessible, and odds are most people who get a game early from retail doesn't do stuff like this, because even they know that they could be slammed for doing things like this. That's why when the game finally hits street date, THEN do all the unlisted videos and such of the game become publicly viewable. This streamer was probably thinking they were too badass to get in trouble, poked the bear too many times, and now faces the consequences for their actions.

 

[J-Will]

The streamer couldn't even help himself not leak footage of brothership before the release date

 

[ciro64]

That was pretty stupid to stream it. The ninjas are everywhere, always watching.

Always watching.

 

[subcon959]

It has never been underground, forums are just the modern BBS, and domain names are the modern phone numbers. Things are really not much different from how they were way back.

I take it you weren't part of it in the 1980s? It absolutely was underground. Literally, in some meet-ups.

 

[Lumpofcoal]

If the things about him ignoring multiple warnings and even taunting (ie to the effect of "come get me if you can, bro") ninty are true, then he was literally asking for it and he now has his wish.

If he is still a teen, ninty might let him off "lightly" by settling for his parents paying a reduced sum (eg 10k) on his behalf and having him write a public apology and undertaking to never do this again. Only question if his pride will be able to swallow it or will he expect his parents to sell off everything to fight it to the bitter end and preserve his pride.

It is one thing to be indignant towards ninty, it's another to let it go to one's head and override common sense.

 

[ZeroFX]

was only a matter of time streamers think they are invincible. even though it's assholetendo I'm actually glad this finally happened to one of them. rule number one in pirating: don't post your fucking receipt!

I pirate and i can send ninty a list of all their games i am pirating right now just for the lols.

But i wouldn't stream them, i am not a streamer.

 

[ZachariasBarnham]

I'm not taking Nintendo's side here, but even a broken clock is right twice a day.

The streamer faffed around and now he found out. He gets no sympathy from me.

 

[Sir Tortoise]

Nintendo really has no leg to stand on here when it comes to most of these charges. No proof of piracy. Streaming a game before it releases is not proof of piracy & is not illegal. If retailers decide to release games before their official release date that is on the retailer not the customer. Companies like Nintendo need to learn that their policy, EULA, TOS etc. are NOT law.

Plenty of evidence that would point towards piracy, though - use of an emulator, providing instructions on how to obtain pirated copies, etc etc. No, emulators don't equal piracy, but it's sure as hell easier to use them for piracy than legit. It's as much evidence as you can get in this sort of early stage, not definitive but cases like this don't need to be definitive. It just needs to be more convincing than "I obtained and dumped early copies of numerous games before release, the piracy advice was just a complete coincidence" which I don't think anyone will buy. His defence would then be how he managed to do that, which if genuine would probably mean snitching on some retail employee he was working with. All that to probably still have a very shaky looking defence to a layperson.

Besides, Nintendo don't even need to win to send the message.