this really is nonsensical, you know...grammatically, argumentatively, even philosophically.Imagine if someone makes a cloning device.
They clone a bike.
Kid gets mad that bike is copied.
Claims theft. But still has bike.
/Logic
the victim, in this case, would be the people who conceived of, designed and subsequently sold the bike to consumers, yet who were denied compensation in this imaginary cloning scenario.
unless, of course, this random kid, who i guess in your example was relieved of his bike, for hypothetical cloning purposes, never got his bike back.
/sense