I never said your post in particular. Hence why I didn't quote anyone in particular.Since when does a discussion make a flamewar? I don't see anything at all about my post that's purposely inciting. >.>
I never said your post in particular. Hence why I didn't quote anyone in particular.
How is this huge off topic back and forth of "Nintendo sucks!" "Nintendo is the best!" NOT a flame war?
As for Windwaker being the worst, Guild? You obviously haven't played Zelda II. That one was full of terrible executions, frustrating mechanics, and a deviation from the traditional formula.
This is one of the dumbest things to say in terms of Zelda 2. You can't say it strayed away from traditional Zelda when there was only ONE Zelda game before it.
And honestly, Zelda 2 isn't that bad. It's buttfucking with a sandpaper condom hard yeah, but it's still a pretty good game.
I can say that because it was so radically different than the first. It's part of the reason they went back to the other formula.
Did I say it was a bad game, or a bad Zelda title? The two are not mutually inclusive.
They didn't really go back to the original format. The original just placed players into the world. No map. No idea where to go. A Link to the Past told players where to go, Ocarina of time and forward went third person and not top down. A Link Between Worlds is more like ALttP.
technically it came packaged with a map and some idea of what to do actually found some pics of the original mapThey didn't really go back to the original format. The original just placed players into the world. No map. No idea where to go. A Link to the Past told players where to go, Ocarina of time and forward went third person and not top down. A Link Between Worlds is more like ALttP.
Good choice, really nice game