Trolleydave, on the internet we all have a genius IQ (apparently).
I actually have been tested as high as yourself actually. But on the internet, proof is something that rarely exists. I might as well say my johnson is 12 inches long. Hey it's not impossible, just unlikely.
As for gibberish, refer to the above sentiment.
Are you trying to get into a battle of wits with me?
It looks to me like you understood my post perfectly, so in what way does that equate to it being gibberish? Please if you're going to attempt to insult me at least use an on-line dictionary before bantering about attempted insults.
The post you made where you spouted lines of philosophical self-justification contained utter nonsense. Half of it had absolutely nothing to do with the point you were attempting to make and the other half was just wasted bandwith. You were attempting to weasle you're way out of talking pure crap by talking even more crap. I would imagine that you thought you were being clever and spouting half-assed low logic philosophy would make you sound clever and confuse me, instead it just made you look foolish. It wasn't big and it wasn't clever, so just accept your Idiocracy award and move on.
Panzer Tacticer said:
I do not justify my actions. Nor do I presume to quote law.
It sounds to me like you do have to justify it, otherwise why use flawed mathematics like "I pay for my bandwith so I pay for my games". If you bought a stolen car the cars still stolen.
Panzer Tacticer said:
And just because it is formally written as law, doesn't make it immediately worthy.
It still doesn't stop it being the law does it.
QUOTE(Panzer Tacticer @ Apr 26 2008, 04:53 PM) Some interesting thoughts. Could you pay someone to kill a known killer?
Could you burgle a house of a known criminal?
If you found a case of money and some dead people, (in a deal gone bad), would you have trouble keeping the money?
There you go again. What exactly does that have to with anything? Those thoughts aren't interesting, they're old and tired and usually used by pseudo-intellectuals when they feel the need to look and sound smarter than the average human. They have nothing to do wth you foolishly saying that you don't believe you pirate games because you pay for the means necessary to allow you to do it. Hardly the logic of an intelligent 40-something, rather it's the logic of somebody with a guilty conciense and a need to justify his actions to himself and others while at the same time attemping to mantain a feeling of superiority of others due to an over-inflated ego, sense of self-worth and pseudo-intellectualism.
QUOTE(Panzer Tacticer @ Apr 26 2008, 04:53 PM)
We all know of a long list of actions, like the examples above, that are technically crimes.
It always comes down to do you always give a damn?