I maed an isou elxpoit it eorks ecen on neew 3ds xxl
is tat sapparted wit mah nintenda ofw
I maed an isou elxpoit it eorks ecen on neew 3ds xxl
Yes butt is not. Redy yetis tat sapparted wit mah nintenda ofw
butt
that this isn't EOF.Olease understnd
@HykemIn contrary to what I've read in this thread, there is proof of developers with fully functional IOSU exploits (not sure if they are all the same or not), and, subsequently, CFWs. The fact of the matter is that everything is ready and developed, but developers don't want to release it yet. And for good reason too. Threads like these make developers go "fuck it, I'm done".
The only proof Hykem ever had was the word of others. Anyway, he's inactive on this forum, deleted his Twitter account, and dropped out from the homebrew scene.
Exactly. And why did he do this...?The only proof Hykem ever had was the word of others. Anyway, he's inactive on this forum, deleted his Twitter account, and dropped out from the homebrew scene.
But every time I ask about it I'm ignored.Say, why Smash of all things? I heard that it has a userland exploit, but every time I ask about it I'm ignored.
Perhaps it's because no one else has ever heard of this exploit. Not trying to call you out on anything; it's just that theoretical exploits are typically overshadowed by exploits you can actually use.But every time I ask about it I'm ignored.
Because it has SD access to save screenshots and you know, Loadiine loads the games from there. Mii Maker has SD access because QR and Mii picture saving to SD.I've heard snippets about it, the fact that it exists, but asking the members who referenced it gets me nowhere. On the other hand, why does Loadiine use Smash?
Because it has SD access to save screenshots and you know, Loadiine loads the games from there. Mii Maker has SD access because QR and Mii picture saving to SD.
Ah.Because it has SD access to save screenshots and you know, Loadiine loads the games from there. Mii Maker has SD access because QR and Mii picture saving to SD.
This is the most honest post here. I was going to say that no one here knows how to do it, which is why they accuse op of not knowing anything instead of explaining why it hasn't been done. (Or demonstrated). Noobs asking stupid questions doesn't bother me near as much as people that freak out on them without knowing the answer themselves.I h8 2 play the mod
that this isn't EOF.
Also, OP, yes, we can run unsigned code with kernel privileges, yes, would be possible to access IOSU with it. The thing is, we don't know how to. We can run code, it's just that we don't know yet what we have to run exactly to get IOSU.
In contrary to what I've read in this thread, there is proof of developers with fully functional IOSU exploits (not sure if they are all the same or not), and, subsequently, CFWs. The fact of the matter is that everything is ready and developed, but developers don't want to release it yet. And for good reason too. Threads like these make developers go "fuck it, I'm done".
Smea, actually, released a video of his working implementation of the IOSU exploit.I'll challenge the statement about the private IOSU hack being "fully functional" - it is anything but.
So far all the evidence shows no one has been able to get it to work in a way it could possibly be released.
The "H" person realized this and gave up, as did SMEA, F0F and many others.
I'll challenge the statement about the private IOSU hack being "fully functional" - it is anything but.
So far all the evidence shows no one has been able to get it to work in a way it could possibly be released.
The "H" person realized this and gave up, as did SMEA, F0F and many others.