PNo4 said:hungyip84 said:And for the auto-widescreen detection, it's done by the libogc library. It seems to be able to detect the screen ratio. I will let you guys to test on it.
Much more wide in 7.2 then in "manual" 7.1 config =/
GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE V2 said:For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether
gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that
you have. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the
source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their
rights.
dun4cheap said:PNo4 said:hungyip84 said:And for the auto-widescreen detection, it's done by the libogc library. It seems to be able to detect the screen ratio. I will let you guys to test on it.
Much more wide in 7.2 then in "manual" 7.1 config =/
The manual mode was wrong to begin with. I had bosted the true dimensions early on. The other thing that needs to be understood is the cover art work should not have to be resized or stretched at all. It is the background that should be 16:9 with the cover art box remaining the same aspect that the covers were created in. While I am a coder by career, my hobby is video and photography. So it was interesting watching everyone wanting to resize the covers.
dun4cheap said:PNo4 said:Much more wide in 7.2 then in "manual" 7.1 config =/
1. The manual mode was wrong to begin with.
2. I had bosted the true dimensions early on.
3. The other thing that needs to be understood is the cover art work should not have to be resized or stretched at all.
4. It is the background that should be 16:9 with the cover art box remaining the same aspect that the covers were created in.
5. While I am a coder by career, my hobby is video and photography. So it was interesting watching everyone wanting to resize the covers.
vettacossx said:for people reading who are curious about the jargon or termonology source code is just the original code
and if you see the words Open source or the phrase under GPL that just means it is a freely distributed and edited code also GPL is just a general public license agreementhope that helps lamen things up a bit for spectators ect...
fabi280 said:If you change something that is licenced under the GPL you have to republish it with the new source!
fabi280 said:vettacossx said:for people reading who are curious about the jargon or termonology source code is just the original code
and if you see the words Open source or the phrase under GPL that just means it is a freely distributed and edited code also GPL is just a general public license agreementhope that helps lamen things up a bit for spectators ect...
If you change something that is licenced under the GPL you have to republish it with the new source!
Though this isn't really for personal use if you're uploading it for others.idane said:fabi280 said:vettacossx said:for people reading who are curious about the jargon or termonology source code is just the original code
and if you see the words Open source or the phrase under GPL that just means it is a freely distributed and edited code also GPL is just a general public license agreementhope that helps lamen things up a bit for spectators ect...
If you change something that is licenced under the GPL you have to republish it with the new source!
Actually, AFAIK, GPL'd code can be freely changed, and a copy of the source must be distributed along with the binary. If someone gets some GPL'd code and modifies it for personal use, they are not required to distribute the code.
idane said:fabi280 said:vettacossx said:for people reading who are curious about the jargon or termonology source code is just the original code
and if you see the words Open source or the phrase under GPL that just means it is a freely distributed and edited code also GPL is just a general public license agreementhope that helps lamen things up a bit for spectators ect...
If you change something that is licenced under the GPL you have to republish it with the new source!
Actually, AFAIK, GPL'd code can be freely changed, and a copy of the source must be distributed along with the binary. If someone gets some GPL'd code and modifies it for personal use, they are not required to distribute the code.
They must if it's gpl v3.idane said:fabi280 said:vettacossx said:for people reading who are curious about the jargon or termonology source code is just the original code
and if you see the words Open source or the phrase under GPL that just means it is a freely distributed and edited code also GPL is just a general public license agreementhope that helps lamen things up a bit for spectators ect...
If you change something that is licenced under the GPL you have to republish it with the new source!
Actually, AFAIK, GPL'd code can be freely changed, and a copy of the source must be distributed along with the binary. If someone gets some GPL'd code and modifies it for personal use, they are not required to distribute the code.
dun4cheap said:PNo4 said:hungyip84 said:And for the auto-widescreen detection, it's done by the libogc library. It seems to be able to detect the screen ratio. I will let you guys to test on it.
Much more wide in 7.2 then in "manual" 7.1 config =/
The manual mode was wrong to begin with. I had bosted the true dimensions early on. The other thing that needs to be understood is the cover art work should not have to be resized or stretched at all. It is the background that should be 16:9 with the cover art box remaining the same aspect that the covers were created in. While I am a coder by career, my hobby is video and photography. So it was interesting watching everyone wanting to resize the covers.