- Joined
- Nov 24, 2018
- Messages
- 86
- Reaction score
- 126
- Trophies
- 1
- Age
- 32
- Location
- Buckingham Palace
- XP
- 2,044
- Country

Oh yay, another thread created by the resident brain tumour with backup from his melanoma.


Nah, the boot that you can't get out of your mouth.The tears? Salty. Keep it up.
Nah, the boot that you can't get out of your mouth.

Too late. Try to set it up better next time.

>Police stateWhat a surprise that the bootlicker is in support of a police state



By police state you mean just enforcing the absolute basic laws
They need to investigate if that guy is in the country legally. Also do a check on his family, friends and co-workers.


What's the problem? Investigate and find if these people are linked to criminals committing crimes.No further context needed
Area shut down. People being told to leave. Refuse to leave. Advance on officers. Get told to stop and to leave. Keep advancing. Get told to stop and get back. Keep advancing. Told to stop. Keep advancing. Get shot with a rubber bullet.Firing at unarmed civilians at near point-blank range. Not even protestors
View attachment 510411
View attachment 510414
View attachment 510413

"Guilty until proven innocent" is not how any of this works, that's the fucking problem. Meanwhile, you refuse to acknowledge the fact that the person giving these illegal orders was already found guilty of 34 felonies. You're clearly not in favor being "tough on crime," you're in favor of establishing an authoritarian police state with laws that only protect the rich.What's the problem? Investigate and find if these people are linked to criminals committing crimes.

Cringe."Guilty until proven innocent" is not how any of this works, that's the fucking problem. Meanwhile, you refuse to acknowledge the fact that the person giving these illegal orders was already found guilty of 34 felonies. You're clearly not in favor being "tough on crime," you're in favor of establishing an authoritarian police state with laws that only protect the rich.

That's certainly not a refutation of anything I said, so I'll take it as an acknowledgment that I hit the nail on the head. It's time to grow up and get out of your pathetic edgelord phase, lest you join the third reich and confederacy in their rightful place, buried under six feet of feces.Cringe.
You can't investigate every US citizen, you need probable cause first. And before you ask, no, a person exercising their first amendment right to protest is not probable cause.How is investigating anyone "guilty until proven innocent". You investigate someone find if they've done anything then you can charge them.

No, it's a bunch of cowards afraid of a single, unarmed woman just trying to get home, shooting and injuring this individual instead of at the ground in front of her. You have to be pretty fucked in the head to think the use of a gun, even with rubber bullets, was the sane thing to use in this case.What's the problem? Investigate and find if these people are linked to criminals committing crimes.
Keep the country safe. Deport these dangerous thugs.
Post automatically merged:
Area shut down. People being told to leave. Refuse to leave. Advance on officers. Get told to stop and to leave. Keep advancing. Get told to stop and get back. Keep advancing. Told to stop. Keep advancing. Get shot with a rubber bullet.
What's the problem? There's a riot going on in case you didn't know.
"The coloreds should just stick you their own drinking fountains. That's the lawful order"I see dumbasses ignoring lawful orders to disperse and leave the area. I see one dumbass in particular belligerently resisting those orders. I cannot see what he did that caused some officers to rush and detain him, he was slightly out of frame at that moment. So I can't say if he did something that justified that action or not. (And neither can you.)


They're not protesting they're rioting.That's certainly not a refutation of anything I said, so I'll take it as an acknowledgment that I hit the nail on the head. It's time to grow up and get out of your pathetic edgelord phase, lest you join the third reich and confederacy in their rightful place, buried under six feet of feces.
You can't investigate every US citizen, you need probable cause first. And before you ask, no, a person exercising their first amendment right to protest is not probable cause.

If that was the policy of the Trump administration, then most of these protests would not be happening. ICE has been rounding up a lot of legal immigrants with Visas and no criminal record, however, and the focus is on arresting and deporting as many non-whites as possible rather than actual national security.OK, most of Illegals that cross the Boarder are just looking for a better Life, and that is their Right. Just follow the Laws, especially Immigration Laws, and they will be fine.
There is no need to cover their faces and conceal their identities if they are acting in a legitimate capacity as law enforcement. They fear retaliation only because they know that they're acting like thugs and criminals themselves.Oh, and for all of you trying to Identify ICE Agents to put their Information out there - Anything happens to them and-or their Families, then guess what.....YOU are Liable, and hope you sleep well at Night with that.
So then police should investigate those few individuals who can be seen on camera inciting riots. That doesn't require the national guard be called in, let alone active duty military. That's intentional escalation by the government.They're not protesting they're rioting.
Not to mention what this is costing the taxpayersThat doesn't require the national guard be called in, let alone active duty military. That's intentional escalation by the government.









