The Meme Box

[mrgone]

I mean..
View attachment 313807

awesome

 

[CoolMe]

 

[LeyendaV]

Random people leaving opinions on a public notice made by a public company in a public place in view of the public, as it were, can fully expect to have said opinions scrutinized.

Scrutinized, maybe. Radicalize, no. And what they are doing here is radicalizing that opinion, in the name of the one saying it.
For that, doesn't matter where he said it, you just can't do that.

And if they don't want to be misunderstood they should elaborate.

Again, no. Free speech means you can express yourself, one is not forced to elaborate simply because the one who don't agree will use his words against him, even if he wasn't trying to say anything bad.

 

[VDDZ]

Stolen from Redditer onceawisemansaidFuck

 

[SG854]

 

[MrNoobNub]

Greasy chicken? on my controllers? Hell naw

Someone noticed my signature

 

[CoolMe]

 

[hippy dave]

 

[Veho]

Scrutinized, maybe. Radicalize, no. And what they are doing here is radicalizing that opinion, in the name of the one saying it.
For that, doesn't matter where he said it, you just can't do that.

I wouldn't call either of the positions "radical" in and of themselves. And I didn't ascribe any one of them to Preston here.

I'm just saying how the same opinion can come from two opposite positions, and we don't know which without examining the bigger picture.

Again, no. Free speech means you can express yourself, one is not forced to elaborate simply because the one who don't agree will use his words against him, even if he wasn't trying to say anything bad.

No. Without any points of context or reference that would explain the post, whoever reads it can (and will) interpret it however they want. Nobody is "forcing" him to elaborate, he's not tied to a chair until he writes a 500 word paragraph on the subject. But if he leaves it vague, ambiguous and open to interpretation, then he can't complain if people ask for clarification, or misinterpret it. "Death of the author" and all that.
Again, I was saying how you can't draw any conclusions based on just a screenshot taken out of context.

 

[Something whatever]

 

[hippy dave]

 

[tofino]

View attachment 313955

i like how you can know how old this post is

 

[Veho]

 

[impeeza]

View attachment 314001

false, because the wooden is not organic, the vegans will puke for the blood, that guillotine is a gender offender because is a phallic symbol but also have a hole. so after months (or even years) of discussion nothing will be done.

 

[hippy dave]

false, because the wooden is not organic, the vegans will puke for the blood, that guillotine is a gender offender because is a phallic symbol but also have a hole. so after months (or even years) of discussion nothing will be done.

Right that's it, I'm adding you to the guillotining list.
Don't worry tho, you've got a while - first we've got to get through every politician, CEO etc.

 

[jt_1258]

Right that's it, I'm adding you to the guillotining list.
Don't worry tho, you've got a while - first we've got to get through every politician, CEO etc.

much less the overpopulated horny jail occupants

 

[hippy dave]

much less the overpopulated horny jail occupants

Nah pardons all round. The horny police are on the guillotining list along with the regular kind, ACAB.

 

[CoolMe]

 

[VDDZ]

Stolen from Redditer Get_Verminated

 

[impeeza]

Right that's it, I'm adding you to the guillotining list.
Don't worry tho, you've got a while - first we've got to get through every politician, CEO etc.

Perfect I get in line, but only if I can be put on the guillotine in supine position.