TEST

[impeeza]

kidding?

 

[impeeza]

no automerge indeed!

 

[AncientBoi]

Makes you wonder.

 

[a_username_that_is_cool]

• auagga

 

[impeeza]

hi Captionhello Caption

1. Hi Content
2. Hello Content

 

[impeeza]

insertando URL

Emulation Homebrew Tutorial  Thread 'Building SM64 for Nintendo Switch from sm64ex-alo Repository'

Mar 25, 2024

Hi, I hope the next steps help to somebody, first forgive my bad English, is no my native language.

After the project «n64decomp» finished lots of forks emerged. One of them is the SM 64 PC Port which have as aim to be a port of n64decomp for modern devices.

Some of these ports was for the Switch console and become real on the fork fgsfdsfgs that fork seems to be staled, Now @AloXado320 have resumed the work with the repository AloUltraExt and add some features and converged the latest code with latest refresh from the decomp project...

• impeeza
• Replies: 185
• Forum: Nintendo Switch

• 
• 

 

[x65943]

 

[x65943]

 

[SylverReZ]

View attachment 513561

@x65943 wants a piece of his special BBQ sauce.

 

[x65943]

@x65943 wants a piece of his special BBQ sauce.

cranesbill tried to give me some, but I knew what was up after seeing what happened to ancientboi

 

[SylverReZ]

cranesbill tried to give me some, but I knew what was up after seeing what happened to ancientboi

Mmm... regardless, this is some really good sau- ... zzzzzz

 

[x65943]

Mmm... regardless, this is some really good sau- ... zzzzzz

prepares to perform the obligation

 

[smileyhead]

[TABLE=full]
[TR]
[th]heading 0[/th][th]heading 1[/th][th]heading 2[/th]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="33.3333%"]content 0.0[/td][td width="33.3333%"]content 0.1[/td][td width="33.3333%"]content 0.2[/td]
[/TR]
[TR]
[td width="33.3333%"]content 1.0[/td][td width="33.3333%"]content 1.1[/td][td width="33.3333%"]content 1.2[/td]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

 

[tempytemp]

damn popup!
are you gone yet?

Post automatically merged: Jul 16, 2025

the popup seems gone

 

[hippy dave]

damn popup!
are you gone yet?

Post automatically merged: Jul 16, 2025

the popup seems gone

It comes and it goes. Apparently we won't be free of it until xenforo reelases a fixed version.

 

[smileyhead]

It comes and it goes. Apparently we won't be free of it until xenforo reelases a fixed version.

They just did, hence the test. See here.

EDIT: The pop-up seems to be gone, indeed.

 

[hippy dave]

They just did, hence the test. See here.

EDIT: The pop-up seems to be gone, indeed.

Oshit good news, thanks for the heads up

 

[IC]

TEST!!!!!

 

[JuanMena]

Test:

Alright, let’s put it in math form instead of a picture.


We’re talking about the unit distance graph of the plane, where:


<br>V(G) = \{ (x, y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 \}<br>

E(G) = { {u, v} \mid \text{distance}(u, v) = 1 }


The problem asks for:


<br>\chi(\mathbb{R}^2) = \min\{ k \in \mathbb{N} \mid \exists\ \text{proper } k\text{-coloring of } G \}<br>

---

Lower bound (Triangle/Moser idea):


Take a finite induced subgraph such that


<br>\chi(H) = 4<br>

That proves:


<br>\chi(\mathbb{R}^2) \ge 4<br>

---

Upper bound (Hexagon tiling):


Tile the plane with congruent hexagons of diameter .
Define


<br>f : \mathbb{R}^2 \to \{1,2,\dots,7\}<br>

<br>f(p) = (a(p) + 2b(p)) \bmod 7<br>

This guarantees no two points at distance exactly 1 have the same -value.
Therefore:


<br>\chi(\mathbb{R}^2) \le 7<br>

---

So mathematically:


<br>4 \le \chi(\mathbb{R}^2) \le 7<br>

“hexagon” = .

---

You basically jumped straight to:


<br>\boxed{\text{known bounds on the Hadwiger–Nelson problem}}<br>

If you want, I could also write the triangle forcing proof fully as inequalities — that’s the mathy equivalent of me “sketching” it. That’s where it gets spicy.

Edit: ChatGPT began to use Kanjis to explain "unsolvable maths problems using Infinity as a value" and was curious if said Kanjis would appear on here, but I guess not?

 

[XFoxPrower]

Test thread? Let's see if I can get linebreak escapes to work... A B C.