some of you make no sense at all. Is this a result of that common core crap they teach in American schools now?
menuhax variation of the bootmanager? You don't need menuhax at all even with a9lh. Why the heck are you thinking about menuhax?
needs .firm support? Luma already HAS .firm support and is a boot manager in itself. Even in the first days of a9lh v1, I had been using a multi stage2 a9lh so I could boot directly to luma or gateway, or chainload through luma (AND bootanim9). You don't even need to use the boot menu, since as of before the current version (I'm stuck where I can't play with the new stuff for a few more hours) you could still name your payloads a_xxxx.bin and start_aaaa.bin and such to launch with a button press instead of using the menu.
TL;DR
Luma already chainloads .firm files and TuxSH released a simple python converter to change .bin payloads into .firm payloads.
menuhax variation of the bootmanager? You don't need menuhax at all even with a9lh. Why the heck are you thinking about menuhax?
needs .firm support? Luma already HAS .firm support and is a boot manager in itself. Even in the first days of a9lh v1, I had been using a multi stage2 a9lh so I could boot directly to luma or gateway, or chainload through luma (AND bootanim9). You don't even need to use the boot menu, since as of before the current version (I'm stuck where I can't play with the new stuff for a few more hours) you could still name your payloads a_xxxx.bin and start_aaaa.bin and such to launch with a button press instead of using the menu.
TL;DR
Luma already chainloads .firm files and TuxSH released a simple python converter to change .bin payloads into .firm payloads.
Last edited by urherenow,