Hacking (PSA) Stop the Gatehate

  • Thread starter Thread starter NiggomBiggom
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 46,568
  • Replies Replies 488
  • Likes Likes 36
Let's see
1. Gatewait is expensive.
2. Gatebait can brick
3. CFW is a free alternative with much more features. NTR's screen recording without a capture card is an example.
4. CFW is actively worked on by many devs, while gaytbate has shit code, and is worked on by a very few people.
5. Updates for CFW are frequent, while updates for shitway are released Soon™
6. We have nobody advertising CFW, it is free to use (saying again) while brickway(I'm running out of names to use) has people like you bump GBATemp saying "gaybay is gud, yuz id, dond hade id"

Well I'll say this again, you pay for Gaytbait , when CFW which is free does the same thing the job better. Why use it then?
I was thinking about getting one because I have multiple SD cards, but Gateway mode is so far behind CFWs I decided not to. I have a Sky3DS+ I use one of my 64 GB cards with, and the other 64 GB card is in my N3DS for EmuNAND. I had these SD cards from my Sky3DS before downgrading on above 9.3 was a thing, and didn't want to buy another micro SD and not use those ones.
 
Last edited by RedBlueGreen,
Guys. You're all wrong. Why would you use rxtools, Luma, a9lh or gateway? The best option is Palantine cfw! Think about it:
1. It came before rxtools and Luma so really they're just stealing its ideas
2. It's really bare so it's not confusing for users
3. It has a splash screen built in with no configuration needed
4. It runs through mset which is much more stable than a9lh or gateway
 
Last edited by bi388,
Let's see
1. Gatewait is expensive.
2. Gatebait can brick
3. CFW is a free alternative with much more features. NTR's screen recording without a capture card is an example.
4. CFW is actively worked on by many devs, while gaytbate has shit code, and is worked on by a very few people.
5. Updates for CFW are frequent, while updates for shitway are released Soon™
6. We have nobody advertising CFW, it is free to use (saying again) while brickway(I'm running out of names to use) has people like you bump GBATemp saying "gaybay is gud, yuz id, dond hade id"

Well I'll say this again, you pay for Gaytbait , when CFW which is free does the same thing the job better. Why use it then?
It's quite easy to point out people who didn't read the op :)
Saying a disclaimer is a disclaimer implies that it's justified or okay because they gave a warning.
that was meant to argue against people who say users were unexpecting. there are way too many red flags for something like that to be the case?
..and with every Gateway thread.. Someone else is bringing up the Wii.. Oh dear lord.
why not? everyone else gets to use brick code as a defense. why can't i?
And you haven't read the answer from Wii brew about this, explaining that it was a bug and the purpose of the code change was not to brick consoles.
k, i haven't. wanna show me? i'd love to see that.
 
Guys. You're all wrong. Why would you use rxtools, Luma, a9lh or gateway? The best option is Palantine cfw! Think about it:
1. It came before rxtools and Luma so really they're just stealing its ideas
2. It's really bare so it's not confusing for users
3. It has a splash screen built in with no configuration needed
4. It runs through mset which is much more stable than a9lh or gateway
Interesting joke because of the first 3 items, but the 4th is flat out wrong. Palatine CFW has a 20% boot rate at best.
 
It's quite easy to point out people who didn't read the op :)

that was meant to argue against people who say users were unexpecting. there are way too many red flags for something like that to be the case?

why not? everyone else gets to use brick code as a defense. why can't i?

k, i haven't. wanna show me? i'd love to see that.

..because it's not the same thing? If you need me to explain why, then you shouldn't be on this site. "b-b-but they bricked their hardware" To protect themselves. Not their wallets. "b-b-but they didn't give any warnings!" ...and? Nintendo is free to do with their hardware as they please. Gateway, on the other hand, has no business destroying a user's system out of greed. Seriously..
 
Go back to your own site, stupid Gateway sales representative. Gateway cards are pieces of shit, along with their entire company. Whether the whole CFW community is just as shitty is a different discussion. Using a Gateway card is dangerous, pointless, and unsafe. Everything that Gateway does, CFW does 3 times better. While it may be true that they were around first, and there is nothing wrong with being grateful for that, they are just flat-out obsolete.
DEPRECATED
E
P
R
E
C
A
T
E
D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kioku
..because it's not the same thing? If you need me to explain why, then you shouldn't be on this site. "b-b-but they bricked their hardware" To protect themselves. Not their wallets. "b-b-but they didn't give any warnings!" ...and? Nintendo is free to do with their hardware as they please. Gateway, on the other hand, has no business destroying a user's system out of greed. Seriously..
except for the fact that bricking consoles is illegal. gateway isn't exactly wary of illegalities. and even then, "to protect themselves, not their wallets." is invalid here because gateway protected both their profits and their blatantly stolen code. onto the next argument, it should probably start with, "but gateway runs off of stolen code! it's all they do!!"
 
  • Like
Reactions: dankzegriefer
except for the fact that bricking consoles is illegal. gateway isn't exactly wary of illegalities. and even then, "to protect themselves, not their wallets." is invalid here because gateway protected both their profits and their blatantly stolen code. onto the next argument, it should probably start with, "but gateway runs off of stolen code! it's all they do!!"

Should probably read Nintendo's EULA. They reserve the right to render your consoles useless should you alter them. So, no, that's wrong. Also, Gateway protected stolen code that they stole? K. Seriously, you're a fanboy. Your posts show this, pretty clearly.
 
..because it's not the same thing? If you need me to explain why, then you shouldn't be on this site. "b-b-but they bricked their hardware" To protect themselves. Not their wallets. "b-b-but they didn't give any warnings!" ...and? Nintendo is free to do with their hardware as they please. Gateway, on the other hand, has no business destroying a user's system out of greed. Seriously..
Also their brickcode breaks random innocent devices, because it's poorly coded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kioku
except for the fact that bricking consoles is illegal. gateway isn't exactly wary of illegalities. and even then, "to protect themselves, not their wallets." is invalid here because gateway protected both their profits and their blatantly stolen code. onto the next argument, it should probably start with, "but gateway runs off of stolen code! it's all they do!!"
Who did GW steal their code from again? Pretty sure at this point in time everyone was stealing from GW.
 
b4c9fe614fe712ff42605dc7d7329012.png


Taken straight from Nintendo. Please read the last sentence. Seriously, anyone who uses the Wii argument needs to wake up.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Also their brickcode breaks random innocent devices, because it's poorly coded.

That makes it good, right?
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum