Yes Ev1l0rd, that's exactly why I go with GPL copyleft instead of a basic do anything you want license. It's a matter of respect and integrity! If you use some free software / open source code that you didn't write, but like and decided to use, then returning your modifications and changes back is like saying thank you for your hard work and letting us use your code and as our thank you the improvements we've made are given back! It only makes sense... Ignoring that is like a big middle finger fuck you, 'yea we used your code but we don't appreciate it at all and we'll take anyone else's code too without any regard to why free software is so awesome because we're breaking that and don't give a shit about free software or the community that makes it happen'. It's benefiting from something but acting like your so above us, despite having to use our code... lol
From the moment that I saw that SX was using the album method to load their backup loader, similarly to our public method of using the album to load our homebrew loader, I speculated at that point that they just used our publicly available code and slightly changed it to load backups instead of homebrew. I however gave them the benefit of the doubt that they were merely just using the same method but their own code.
Seeing the homebrew loader code and strings and even the easter egg just confirms that they didn't even bother to just use the method but their own code to do it, they just took it and used it like it was their own.
Despite not wanting to use their product, I could of still respected them as a group in the scene doing their own thing, but now knowing this I can't seeing as they don't even respect the free software and open source community and all the ways they benefit from it. If they can't respect free software, free as in freedom something you would expect them to stand for, then they don't deserve any respect. Furthermore they should just stop using all free software, don't run linux or use any free software tools, just use win10 and send microsoft all their personal data! lol
So I say fuck em!
Listen asshole, no ones saying they have to give the source... The license itself on the code they used is what requires it, if you knew anything about free software this would be common sense to you. You're saying nothing will happen, sure legally likely no pursuit will happen, but something already has happened. Their scene cred has been ruined, and no free software respecting person will want to work with them.
Anyway there's no need (except under the GPL) for them to release the source code anyway, as if they did, it would just be a slightly modified homebrew loader!

lol Get it right, they're just using our publicly available code, there's nothing they could contribute to the free software community, as they've made clear they only exist because we do!
So is your attitude anyway to thank or be appreciative for what was made possible for you?
Yes exactly! If they wanted to be genuine and respected and maintain their scene cred that's what any respectable group would've done. It's okay to admit that you don't know everything and that you used free software to help you achieve what you were building, but to act like they did it all themselves and shit on the free software community, when we would find out anyway. Lol did they really think they're DRM was uncrackable? They had to know that it would be exposed that we would find out they used public code without credit and without respecting the copyleft license, I guess they just hoped it wouldn't be so soon.
Really it's not much to ask, it's not a restrictive copyright that says you pretty much can't do anything... It's a copyleft! It flips that whole concept on its head and says you're free to do what you want as long as you pass on that freedom for your derivative software!
So they don't like copyright, they don't like copyleft, they're burning all their bridges, they have no friends in any community.
Or what's already happened has happened... Scene cred is worth more than nothing, and they've destroyed that at least in my mind. NeoSlyde, do you use any free software, and do you appreciate what that software does for you? If so how can you be okay with this, how can you attempt to justify it? If you don't care about people respecting free software, then you should stop using all of it that you do (even the software you use without realizing it which is free software), because if it weren't for people having the integrity and genuineness of upholding free software licenses, none of that which you use would even exist.
Yes totally agree especially the last sentence. And I do find it hilarious those that are defending TX as if their software has a right not to be cracked, but everything else is fair game... Hey what don't they get? If you're a person that despises DRM in all it's forms, then you want DRM removed from anything you use, there is no excluding one particular thing from that... What the magical software that bypasses DRM, it's DRM must remain in place and have to be tolerated? LOL No... If you're truly against DRM then you should be all for removing it anywhere it exists! Seriously TX users, wouldn't you want a DRM free version of the software even if you pay / paid for it? With the online drm activation removed? What about the people with no internet? Care to think of them? With the brick code removed? With it analyzed to ensure it's safe?
DRM is no good plain and simple, and it deserves to be removed from any software that puts it in place!
Well maybe they should... Do they care about their reputation? Do you think disregarding free software licenses is a good look? You seem to think this won't hurt them, but we'll remember, we won't forget.

And it's not about free software being incorporated into a backup loader (has nothing to do with it), it's about free software being incorporated without giving credit and without respecting the terms of the license agreement for using that software... Doesn't matter anyway now, since we know where the credit is truly due! lol.
As for removing their DRM it's already being done, but who would want to use even the DRM free version of it knowing it's just a copycat of what we already have the source code for!
I think a bigger impact would be for us to modify the code that we've got thanks to the hard work of the community, similarly to the modifications they did to the same code, to release a publicly available and free software backup loader! I think that would be an even bigger fuck you right back at them! There's more from where that came from!
So we just need to modify the homebrew loader into a backup loader like they've done, incorporating the hactool code to decrypt xcis and then load into memory the decrypted code and start a thread at the entry point!