post here funny pictures

[CoolMe]

 

[CoolMe]

True dat

 

[CoolMe]

 

[CoolMe]

 

[hippy dave]

 

[hippy dave]

 

[SG854]

 

[Veho]

 

[impeeza]

oh the stupidity!

 

[Veho]

oh the stupidity!

Explain pls.

 

[impeeza]

Explain pls.

That make me to remember the sign on a factory:

In case of emergency, the sirens and light will go off, DO NOT STOP TO MAKE VIDEOS OR FACEBOOK LIVE TRANSMISSIONS, follow the indications on floor and EVACUATE.

This generation of "smart" devices created stupid people. (that is the stupidity I mean)

 

[impeeza]

 

[impeeza]

 

[impeeza]

I think that too.

 

[Veho]

That make me to remember the sign on a factory:

In case of emergency, the sirens and light will go off, DO NOT STOP TO MAKE VIDEOS OR FACEBOOK LIVE TRANSMISSIONS, follow the indications on floor and EVACUATE.

This generation of "smart" devices created stupid people. (that is the stupidity I mean)

Ah. Well the difference here is that a conveyor belt in a sushi restaurant doesn't -really- end up in the dishwasher, the staff would have to put the phone there manually.

 

[Veho]

 

[Veho]

 

[KleinesSinchen]

Ah. Well the difference here is that a conveyor belt in a sushi restaurant doesn't -really- end up in the dishwasher, the staff would have to put the phone there manually.

Misunderstood this as anti-stupidity note as well ("Don't put your phone onto the dishwasher belt"). I wonder if there is a jurisdiction, where this kind of threatening disclaimer (if it is not a bad joke) would pass/suffice to allow purposeful damage to property. We have a lot of people here almost worshiping TOS/EULA, so I wouldn't be surprised if this kind of note would convince some of them. I'm really the last person on earth to support bad behavior with smartphones, but that doesn't make criminal activity as reaction any better. I can think of ways how a phone can get on there other than wanting to create stupid videos which further questions legitimacy of such a note.

====
@impeeza
I never understood the idea of creating videos in case of emergency. Why does it need a note like this? Well, sadly it does for whatever reason.
[YouTube] Example: A man flaring pest plants and the fire gets out of control. Instead of doing something his wife just holds the phone (even vertically not even thinking about what orientation makes more sense – God has built the iPhone upright…) and constantly swears at him instead of doing something herself… Like grabbing a water hose or dialing the emergency number.

I can't decide who is more stupid in this case: He for starting a fire and letting it get out of control before even starting to try extinguishing it – or she for using the camera application instead of grabbing a hose (maybe not only for the fire, but also for the man to cool him down and make him regain his senses). This video shouldn't even exist. Still some people will laugh about it: "Haha. He's burning down his garden!"

Fire is fascinating. Yes, I already enjoyed fire as a ten year old… getting rid of green waste/garden waste. Wouldn't dare to do this nowadays taking the behavior of some neighbors in account (though technically not really forbidden here). Same for controlled wood fire for grilling.
For the case that something went wrong, I always had a water hose and sand ready (no video camera though).

 

[impeeza]

I am a voluntary first response and I really lost the count of people putting they self or others on more danger just for a selfie/video in a emergency. Or idiots generating emergencies for a selfie

 

[Veho]

Misunderstood this as anti-stupidity note as well ("Don't put your phone onto the dishwasher belt"). I wonder if there is a jurisdiction, where this kind of threatening disclaimer (if it is not a bad joke) would pass/suffice to allow purposeful damage to property. We have a lot of people here almost worshiping TOS/EULA, so I wouldn't be surprised if this kind of note would convince some of them. I'm really the last person on earth to support bad behavior with smartphones, but that doesn't make criminal activity as reaction any better. I can think of ways how a phone can get on there other than wanting to create stupid videos which further questions legitimacy of such a note.

An EULA is only legally binding if both sides sign the statement saying "I have read and understood the terms of this agreement and accept and agree to the terms and conditions therein"; this is a humorous sign and wouldn't apply. It doesn't allow the restaurant to actually go through with it.
On the other hand, the amount of entitled assholes that agree to terms and conditions and then throw an outraged shit fit when those terms and conditions actually apply to them is absolutely staggering.