The stolen code and the brick code are very real reasons not to use SX OS. However, these things don't matter to me personally.
I don't
reckon anything, but again, I do bring up very real concerns. In other words, I don't accept that TX is influencing this poll, but I acknowledge it as a very real possibility. Here are some of the reasons why:
- You created your account solely to make this thread.
- Your OP reads like an advertisement.
- There has been an influx of new and pro-SX users.
- The English of the aforementioned users sometimes isn't quite right, even when they're allegedly from English-speaking countries.
- We know of similar online tactics, particularly in China.
- I've seen some common phrases used by allegedly separate users to describe SX OS or the free alternatives.
- As predicted, my comment about a majority of users voting for something other than SX OS, despite it having a plurality of votes, was met with a swift adjustment. <--- I tend to treat something more seriously and less like a conspiracy theory when it has predictability.
- We still can't see who voted in the poll.
I fully acknowledge that SX OS might have this high of numbers. GBATemp is full of pirates, and it was only until recently that it was the only way to reliably play backups.
ReiNX and RajNX are just as simple to use as SX OS while having almost all of the features of SX OS and more. In a nutshell, if a person needs XCI-loading and it's worth the money to him or her, then he or she should purchase SX OS. Otherwise, that person should use RajNX or ReiNX to install games from NSP files. The convenience of .3DS backups over .CIA backups on the 3DS wasn't enough for people to continue purchasing Gateway in large numbers, and it won't be enough for people to continue purchasing SX OS in large numbers.
Did the cert come from the same game as the XCI backup? If not, Nintendo could ban you. Playing XCI backups online or offline also carries an inherent ban risk.