It's clearly stated in the log of rev. 54 that the code is untested.
I believe it's also clearly posted what the changes are.
Most of them are bugfixes of the rev. 50
I had 2 requests for the filedescription[fileid].wbfs format.
So I decided to furfill these requests and added that format as it wasn't that much work.
Maybe for some people, they are useless. Can't you say that from every feature in every program.
Maybe some changes can be done better. That's why we use an svn. on googlepage, to allow others
to improve the changes to build a better product. I am the last person who will say he writes perfect code.
I don't think rev. 53 will run any worse than rev. 50, unless I missed something.
I believe it's also clearly posted what the changes are.
Most of them are bugfixes of the rev. 50
I had 2 requests for the filedescription[fileid].wbfs format.
So I decided to furfill these requests and added that format as it wasn't that much work.
Maybe for some people, they are useless. Can't you say that from every feature in every program.
Maybe some changes can be done better. That's why we use an svn. on googlepage, to allow others
to improve the changes to build a better product. I am the last person who will say he writes perfect code.
I don't think rev. 53 will run any worse than rev. 50, unless I missed something.











