
Yes, Sega going third party was surreal. The PS2's success and the rise of Xbox were nice distractions, but the industry was distinctly different.Its sad to see this happening. Even more sad than having to let go of SEGA back in the day.

They're effectively killing Xbox in every way they can. Don't know how anyone can defend them at this point.They are 100% tanking the company!
This will make 3rd party companies, not want to create games for them!
They know what they are doing!
It's all part of a bigger plan!

Yes, Sega going third party was surreal. The PS2's success and the rise of Xbox were nice distractions, but the industry was distinctly different.
Unfortunately, poor business decisions for about three years really tanked Sega's brand. What was it, Sega CD in 1993, 32X in 1994, and the Saturn in 1995? That's a lot of hardware to develop and sell.
If I had to guess, it seems like Sega executives wanted to be first to market for every advancement. Nintendo put their newer tech, such as the Super FX chip, into the cartridges to sidestep the issue.
The Genesis was a success because it focused on software. Sega carved out marketshare against Nintendo when Nintendo was Nintendo (Super Mario World, Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past, Super Metroid, Star Fox, Donkey Kong Country, etc.). Sega merely had to follow up the Genesis with another "Genesis," a single console that focused on the games.
Eventually, Sega realized what they needed to do, and the Dreamcast was seen as a return to form. Unfortunately, the PS2's release was right around the corner.
Yeah, it was a wild ride, back when I was a kid. I liked Sega's output on the Genesis, but there was no way I'd be able to get a Sega CD, 32X, or Saturn. I imagine many kids felt the same way. Just too much hardware at once.Yep. Bad economic decisions during the Saturn era were the culprit of SEGA demise.
Xbox is a very very different case. We are talking about a Trillion+ multinational giant that has a gaming brand.
IF they wanted they could very well stay on the market for 10+ years making small losses on hardware sales, and still have gigantic profits.
BUT we live in the era of Stupidity. So of course some greed stupid higher up (probably more than one) just wants his paycheck and move on to the next business.
I'm worried about the console market. Having just 2 players is not good for the consumer.

Yeah, it was a wild ride, back when I was a kid. I liked Sega's output on the Genesis, but there was no way I'd be able to get a Sega CD, 32X, or Saturn. I imagine many kids felt the same way. Just too much hardware at once.
I agree, this situation is entirely different. Sega fought, even if their decision-making processes were misguided. Microsoft is buying up studios and not making exclusives. They're essentially phasing out their console, despite it being on the market for about five years. For Microsoft, the future may just be Windows, the ROG Xbox Ally, and the Xbox Game Pass. It'll be an interesting shift to watch, but the execution of their plan still baffles me.
Several people feel that way, let me tell you. I don't fault anyone for going console to avoid all the PC headaches. If you can battle through the troubleshooting, you can get a really varied experience on PC. You may even enjoy the additional agency, since you can use XPadder to add controller input to games that don't normally support it, install mods, etc.Jokes on them. I'm not going back to windows. I use consoles to play because i want the simplicity of just working and not bother with drivers, compatibility, drm abusive programs on my pc, etc.
SteamOS is the future for me IF i want to go the pc way ( unless Valve decides to give that up).
But I doubt i will ever come back to pc gaming.
PS/Xbox feels like the same these days...It feels like they've given up and just want to exploit the people who want to buy it anyway, as oppose to actually try and compete against Sony.
PS/Xbox feels like the same these days...
Why bother continuing to make Xbox consoles.
It's official:Just reminded me of some Youtube videos describing the OG Xbox as the 'Dreamcast 2'....I guess MS does what Sega does?
It's official:
Hell yeah!!

Several people feel that way, let me tell you. I don't fault anyone for going console to avoid all the PC headaches. If you can battle through the troubleshooting, you can get a really varied experience on PC. You may even enjoy the additional agency, since you can use XPadder to add controller input to games that don't normally support it, install mods, etc.
When I finish my studies, I should make a note to install a dual-boot of SteamOS. It would absolutely be worth it to see how WINE/Proton functions with my Steam library.
Ah, I remember the olden days of PC games. First, you had to have a capable computer. You may have even needed a serial port for an attachment. Upgrades required you to know every detail about your PC's hardware. Otherwise, your part would likely be incompatible. There were plenty of complicated sims, demanding adventure games, etc. that varied considerably from the "run, jump, and s*oot" console experience of the time.Oh but i used PC's for emulation. i quitted mainstream gaming on PC circa 2001. Even back then was too expensive compared to Console and of course having to deal with Windows crap (Linux gaming still a dream back then).
I will only come back to PC if SteamOS becomes a de-facto player in the space. Then i will consider it (if i have the money)




