Life does not belong to you, even if it is only fetus, he has the right to live!
Thank you for taking the time to publicly figure out what ad hominem means. I enjoyed it very much.
The fetus has not the right to live against the decision of the parent in the first (depending on where you live) three months. While we do see them as living, we dont count them as individual human beings with inseperable rights yet. We allow abortion.
Stop this feaver dream of yours, where you shout "I'm saving babies!", while women have been proven to go through insufferable length to end pregnancies they dont want to carry out. Like applying preassure to the womb until they have a miscarriage. Like killing themselves.
This is the other side of the coin you refuse to look at while still gloating "I'm saving babies lifes!".
By all reasonable accounts you are saving a piece of organic mass, who has yet to develop any sensory ability or consciousness. And what you are doing by playing theres only one side of the coin on that - is to refuse women any right to end pregnancies in a reasonable timeframe, after a considerable amount of deliberation.
Furthermore. If you play idiot hardliner on this (life, life, LIFE), and want to safeguard life from the moment of conception - you really drive women into "judgment tribunals" of what counts as rape and what does not - where 50% of your hardliner friends would 'allow' abortion because they want to feel reasonable as well. And cause more harm in the process.
Furthermore. If you see 'power relationships' playing into sex and procreation at all, you are refusing women recourse on what has to happen with their bodies, from them moment of conception. Thats a freaking bad idea as well.
Furthermore. If you've saved another unwanted child, to then be able to live a life of neglect and abuse - thats on you as well. Anything that somehow lessens the likelyhood of this happening, for the child, for the parents, for the future children of the child, within certain parameters, where we agree on not having to protect the childs life over the decisions of the mother about her own body - is good, not bad.
If you neglect all that, and that making abortion illegal will not make it go away. You are a terrible person, a worse parent, and not even a very good human being. Reasoning - because you dont show empathy with people equally, and because you are unable to retreat from an extreme position, even though people tell you - you are wrong legally, ethically, humanistically, factually (just looking at the process, and how many you would be "saving" by making abortion illegal) even morally (thats a what the majority thinks thing), and still cant back away from a position, thats soley guided by a feeling.
Without holding the empathy of looking at all the other feelings involved.
If you somehow - have convinced yourself, that everything relating new life is rosey, plushy, positive, a miracle, gods creation, wonderful and uplifting - consider looking at other parts of the occasion again. I wish everyone for this to be the case. For giving birth to be the uplifting miracle everyone should experience it as. But we have to look at the cases where those are not the feelings involved - and try to minimize those.
Not even by all means. The opposite. We still try to convince mothers who want to have an abortion, to think about it for a reasonable amount of time, to consider the alternatives, to consider whats best for her child, we give support to her and her unborn child if need be. As a society. But we are humane enough to consider it her decision and her body ultimately. And not yours or the one of your religious friends ('He has the right to live!'). At least not up to a point. And the point is chosen to protect the new human being, from the moment where most of us would consider it becoming a cognisant human being, and not just a bunch of cells.
And yes - we drew a hard line there. That should not be moved lightly.
Now go on to tell teenagers who to have sex with and when again. You're kind is so good at that. Its really like you've found a calling.
If you ever get a concept, of the child being part of the mothers body for 9 months, and the mothers decisions affecting whatever happens to her child as well - and a combined concept, that if that spirals into despair, no one is helped - you've undersstood our side of the argument. You simply cant devide them, and put the unborn child separate for the childs sake. You have no idea what women will take upon themselves to decide what happens to their bodies in less than ideal situations like that. We try to deal with that in a way thats at least somewhat reasonable.
