Harry Potter: Deathly Hallows

Discussion in 'Books, Music, TV & Movies' started by EpicJungle, Nov 25, 2010.

  1. EpicJungle
    OP

    EpicJungle stop browbeating me can't you see i'm sexy

    Member
    1,002
    3
    Aug 28, 2009
    Canada
    Seen the movie on sunday [​IMG]
    Thought it was amazing, but the book was waaay better..
    So, 9.5/10 [​IMG]

    What do you guys think?
     


  2. Tokyo Jihen

    Tokyo Jihen GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    211
    0
    Jul 10, 2010
    United States
    California
    I thought it was pretty good too. Haven't watched a Harry Potter movie in forever; I know this one was way better than 6 imo.
     
  3. kiafazool

    kiafazool GBAtemp Maniac

    Member
    1,221
    0
    Apr 21, 2010
    Canada
    Canada
    my friend told me the story
    it sounds awesome
    it'd be the first time a harry potter movie is good since the ..... first one

    i haven't seen it yet but plan to by the end of the week
     
  4. mercluke

    mercluke ‮҉

    Member
    3,163
    172
    Dec 2, 2007
    Perth
    first one was pretty shit imo, i liked the second one and the 6th one...
     
  5. Costello

    Costello Headmaster

    Administrator
    12,288
    5,287
    Oct 24, 2002
    i saw this last saturday, it was so amazing! the best HP movie so far, at least for me. It was really faithful to the book which is something I appreciate.
    Also, it didn't feel rushed like a lot of the other movies.

    JK rowling said this is her favorite movie of all the series, well I have to agree with her!
     
  6. mercluke

    mercluke ‮҉

    Member
    3,163
    172
    Dec 2, 2007
    Perth
    they should've gone with the split into parts idea for all of them, would've made the series a lot more enjoyable and less stuff would have been ripped from the plotline [​IMG]

    (i've only seen the 30 screener but i hope to go see it at the movies soon)
     
  7. kiafazool

    kiafazool GBAtemp Maniac

    Member
    1,221
    0
    Apr 21, 2010
    Canada
    Canada
    do u have any idea how much money it takes to make a movie?

    for example if 1 HP movie cost $1 million then 6 movies cost $7 million
    if they were all split into parts than 1 move would cost $2 million and 6 movies would cost $14 million

    $14 million that could have made 2 movie series

    its better that they went for the split parts for the last movie for better understanding of the last movie
     
  8. gifi4

    gifi4 How am I a 'New Member'?

    Member
    2,352
    142
    Apr 21, 2010
    Melbourne
    Wait...What??
    Retarded math??
    "for example if 1 HP movie cost $1 million then 6 movies cost $7 million" it should be 6 million.
    "if they were all split into parts than 1 move would cost $2 million and 6 movies would cost $14 million" it should be 12 million

    Anyway, loved the movie.
     
  9. jan777

    jan777 motion control..? srsly? so 2008. 3DS is teh bombz

    Member
    2,829
    36
    Jan 4, 2008
    Well do you know how much every harry potter movie sells?

    the first one made a fucking $974 million. I dont think money is a problem. [​IMG]

    anyway.

    Best Harry potter movie yet. Very faithful to the book. And the modified parts of the movie made sense. like when Hedwig defended Harry.
    but the camping scenes, pretty boring. other than that, [​IMG]

    also IMO 6 was crap. the worst HP movie.

    But they are saying HP7 part 2 is going to be the best. and I think yes. with all the action packed in the last half of the book. [​IMG]
     
  10. KingdomBlade

    KingdomBlade Blade v3+ (I R SHMEXY)

    Member
    2,941
    98
    Apr 24, 2009
    In Vulpes' Fur
    I consider all the films to be different, due to different styles of directing. 1 and 2 were extremely faithful, with much less darkness and more wonderment and excitement. 3 started becoming dark and it has a completely different mood, but I also noticed that the actor that played Dumbledore much less convincing than the original. It was quite gripping but I remember not feeling used to it since it felt so different from the first two. Fans and critics consider it to be the best though, and praised the more stylish approach, and I appreciate it also. 4 had a comedic attitude and focused more on relationships but it was lost in the original plot. I felt that it had too much action but lacked the real plot. I consider it to have some of the best action scenes and effects though, so that's a plus. 5 was very good, and it also had a good plot, and I especially liked Umbridge, which is probably one of the most convincing characers so far. It lacked character development though. 6 was the funniest one to date, and was also faithful to the plot and had quite a lot of both darkness and light and mixed it really well. It is probably the most balanced one.

    7 was the best at character development. It explored the different emotions of the characters really well and was able to make both a dark and light movie. It is probably the most mature of the movies and also, J.K. Rowling says it's her personal favorite.
     
  11. shlong

    shlong in memoriam of gravitas

    Member
    2,301
    568
    Jun 18, 2009
    Italy
    Charlotte's maze
    It was a decent film I thought. The second part I assume will be better, as it has the actiony stuff.
    I didn't like the book, although it was definitely better than Order of the Phoenix.
     
  12. DaRk_ViVi

    DaRk_ViVi Sending you back... to the future!

    Member
    1,059
    51
    Apr 13, 2004
    Italy
    Asti, Italy
    Same idea I had after watching it yesterday. [​IMG]
     
  13. mercluke

    mercluke ‮҉

    Member
    3,163
    172
    Dec 2, 2007
    Perth
    the movies are split making them different movies so they make twice the profit, not half
     
  14. Shinigami357

    Shinigami357 Current "give a fuck" level: Honey Badger

    Member
    1,648
    89
    Jul 29, 2010
    Man, this whole "to split or not to split, that is teh question" discussion sucks major crap. No offense, but really, let them do what they effin want to do.

    Back to topic...
    If Hermione is there, I'm watching. Simple, really. [​IMG]
     
  15. Veho

    Veho The man who cried "Ni".

    Former Staff
    8,765
    16,181
    Apr 4, 2006
    Croatia
    Zagreb
    It was very, extremely, painfully faithful to the book, in that they spent the whole film walking around and angsting and nothing really happened. But that's not a bad thing. The directing, on the other hand, was a bad thing. It was just plain bad.

    And the best part of the movie was the animated bit, the tale of the Deathly Hallows.

    Can't wait for the sequel.
     
  16. shlong

    shlong in memoriam of gravitas

    Member
    2,301
    568
    Jun 18, 2009
    Italy
    Charlotte's maze
    Yeah, that bit was awesome.
     
  17. Varia

    Varia GBAtemp Fan

    Member
    447
    109
    Nov 19, 2010
    Fixed [​IMG]
    Well... not exactly... I found the 4th movie the best out of the lot, the 6th was extremely disappointing.
    Hopefully this one will reach my expectations.
     
  18. Mr.Mysterio

    Mr.Mysterio GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Member
    544
    2
    Oct 12, 2008
    Qatar
    Unknown
    Just watched it today. First HP movie that I have watched in the theatres.
    Wasn't disappointed. Other than the camping scenes, everything else was very well done.
    Can't wait for the second part and I am glad they split it into two.
     
  19. Satangel

    Satangel BEAST

    Member
    10,255
    555
    Nov 27, 2006
    Belgium
    Bruges, Belgium
    It got a really good score from Rotten and it seems to be worthwhile.
    Glad to finally see a good HP movie, did it have to take so long?
     
  20. Tokyo Jihen

    Tokyo Jihen GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    211
    0
    Jul 10, 2010
    United States
    California
    Actually, all the Harry Potter movies have at least a 78% or more approval rating from the critics.