Google Gets Psychic With Google Instant

  • Thread starter Thread starter Terminator02
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 5,277
  • Replies Replies 45
Thank God you can turn it off. I really hate it. I also hate the way they've changed their image search results. Google sucks. Yahoo FTW!
 
First it predicts our search queries, then it ends up predicting our life choices. Though it is a very convenient way of searching for things now, albeit inappropriate and frustrating at times.
 
SPH73 said:
Thank God you can turn it off. I really hate it. I also hate the way they've changed their image search results. Google sucks. Yahoo FTW!

This. I also hate how they show results for things you didn't searched for and when you enter many terms, they end up choosing one or two of them and show the results. I want my search engine to show exactly what i searched for and if they don't find anything, shows the "no results found" message.
 
I hate it. Why would I want to see search results from something I haven't finished typing in yet?

Example: searching for "caterpillar" would begin first showing search results for "cat". Completely irrelevant search results!

Auto complete on the other hand is useful, because quite often you can find the search phrase you're looking for by pressing down a few times. But search results springing up for an incomplete search term? What's the point?
 
I don't like it. There's no point of it because if I'm typing a question, one of the first things it shows is, "How to get rid of Fleas" when I was trying to type, "How to get Sten's approval" -_-

The two aren't related.

Google can't translate and it sucks at being psychic.
 
i tried it and dont like it either. glad i go to google.au automatically everytime hope it doesn't go there
tongue.gif
 
shaunj66 said:
I hate it. Why would I want to see search results from something I haven't finished typing in yet?

Example: searching for "caterpillar" would begin first showing search results for "cat". Completely irrelevant search results!

Auto complete on the other hand is useful, because quite often you can find the search phrase you're looking for by pressing down a few times. But search results springing up for an incomplete search term? What's the point?

I think I'm in agreement here, though I haven't had a chance to try it yet. It may prove useful, but I would think that it is just sending lots of unnecessary AJAX requests in the background. Ultimately making Google a little slower especially on older computers. I mean how hard is it to press return if your fingers are already on the keys?

edit: seems fast after loading it and looking at it, but it just seems a bit silly to me.
 
tj_cool said:
DeltaBurnt said:
Ugh, they of course haven't enabled it for Firefox 4.0 >.>
Are you going to .com ?
It only works there it seems

I've been there, I've enabled it at google.com/instant, and I've tried these supposed direct links.

Google.com/instant says it works for Firefox 3.0 but makes no mention of 4.0.
 
Oh I thought it was behaving weirdly last night, I've been away for a few days so I wondered if it was just me, lol.

I'm going to give it a chance for a bit but I'm not convinced, it's really annoying when it starts throwing up pointless hits based on half of your search terms. Bit of a waste really.
 
shaunj66 said:
Why would I want to see search results from something I haven't finished typing in yet? ...
What's the point?

IMO the point is to show you additional ads on the page - say, like show not one page (with ads) for every search, but several. More ads - more money for Google.

P.S. It does work on Firefox 4b4. Turning it off now - useless and slows thing down. Like their image search that almost kills Google's Chromium, ironically (200MB RAM for just one tab).
 
nando said:
it basically presses enter for you
Yep

Snorlax said:
For people who can't get it to work-
use this direct link.
Thanks

QUOTE(shaunj66 @ Sep 9 2010, 03:48 AM)
I hate it. Why would I want to see search results from something I haven't finished typing in yet?

Example: searching for "caterpillar" would begin first showing search results for "cat". Completely irrelevant search results!

Auto complete on the other hand is useful, because quite often you can find the search phrase you're looking for by pressing down a few times. But search results springing up for an incomplete search term? What's the point?

I see were u guys are coming from ,but it still pretty cool.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum