GBAtemp Quiz #3 Open!

[thieves like us]

Thanks for editing question 24. That Music player was too close to a sound test for me...

But for #25, you still intend to keep "Euraisa"?

That, and the (U) (J) matter. Depends of the strict name of the ROM or not.

Regarding question 25, remove the '2' and the question is OK. Sorry about that.
I will say it refers to the first ENGLISH release as there is no Golden Sun 2 in Japan, if we wanted to know that it would say: Ougon no Taiyou: Ushinawareshi Toki.

unfortunately, this information comes too late for anyone who's already submitted their entries. the question should have clearly stated english release in the way that it was phrased. the people taking the quiz shouldn't have to assume, especially considering that other (jp) releases have been listed with their english name counterparts.

 

[WildWon]

So do we get to re-take the quiz after all the changes are made? (KIDDING!

)

As for people talking about the "peripherals" question, i think its valid. I mean, we are on a "back-ups" board. If you get the backup for a game, is it playable as a backup? No, it has an addon (albeit, part of the cart, but still a peripheral needed for the game) that is not a part of the programming.

Common sense people!

And thanks, mods/crew for throwing these together. If i win or not, it's still fun for a lil knowledge test.

 

[Searinox]

Pfft. That edit attempt on Wikipedia was pathetic, even moreso cause the moron got the edit place wrong, since it's the READING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPER that is in question not the e-reader developer itself. I'm a lil confused about the first GBA flashcart reviewed since I've not been around for that long. With a few tricks such as elimination and the Internet at my disposal it shouldn't be nearly as hard as cheating on my college exams. XD

EDIT: Quiz submitted, now back to stalking DealExtreme CycloDS progress.

 

[bobrules]

I think the scanning technology is talking about a technology not a physical device.

 

[kallekall]

O no! I know I answered a question wrong... I realized it the second I pressed submit... Why can't I change my answer?

 

[T-hug]

If you could change your answer we would have no losers and no point in even making a quiz.

 

[zabikt]

I need a clarification, on this question
What company developed the eReader card scanning technology?

what do you mean by technology.? do you mean hardware or do you mean the technology that actually reads the card. this question is really unclear.

If you had e-Reader, you not need any clarification, because on box it is clearly stated.

 

[Spaceman016]

Thank you for the quiz it was fun.

 

[bobrules]

still the company that made the ereader didn't invent optical scanning technology and the encryption code.

 

[frostfire]

Hope I win this time. Probably I won't heh.

 

[zabikt]

still the company that made the ereader didn't invent optical scanning technology and the encryption code.

It is obvious that you NOT have e-Reader and never had.

 

[Helmut]

Watch out ! Some people found fun to modify wikipedia GBA's page with false information ! That's really child-play and an infraction to wikipedia's rules. I corrected it back.

 

[RupeeClock]

still the company that made the ereader didn't invent optical scanning technology and the encryption code.

It is obvious that you NOT have e-Reader and never had.

Did the e-reader even come out in Canada?
It sure as hell didn't in Europe.

 

[bobrules]

Anyways I think I know the answer, it's asking for technology not device.

 

[zabikt]

Anyways I think I know the answer, it's asking for technology not device.

But on device it is CLEARLY written.

 

[Searinox]

Is the eReader article all they tried to change?

 

[bobrules]

The question is asking for scanning technology not device, so the wikipedia edited doesn't really matter.

 

[zabikt]

Is the eReader article all they tried to change?

Yes, but also GBA article.

 

[Minox]

I'm just not gonna believe anything written in any article after the 15th of July.

 

[asuri]

Watch out ! Some people found fun to modify wikipedia GBA's page with false information ! That's really child-play and an infraction to wikipedia's rules. I corrected it back.

was the thing on gbatemp about the first review fake?