Uhm no. While its very similar to CycloDS, its not a direct copy as its missing several features such as in-game menu and RTS. Therefore I think that it should be considered as a separate device and should have its own section.sboi said:edge is a clone card. so it should not have a section of its own. it should be under clone section.
That doesn't make any sense. The EDGE is as far from the N-Card as it can be.sboi said:cyclods board is not active as there is very minor problems. Its a card which has hardly any problem so far. Cant lump edge and cyclods together, edge should lump with the n-card and clone section.
No.sboi said:u meaning edge will be a sub section with cyclods? if thats the case i have no objection.
Therefore adding the EDGE to the same forum would not disrupt anything, as it is one of the more reliable carts as well.sboi said:OSW, cyclods if popular but it doesn't have much problem so the section is not active...
Oh gee, its so hard to put the word "EDGE" or "CycloDS" in the title (which most people already do, and everyone should do).johnchan said:And what happens with the CycloDS and EDGE firmware gets out of sync, and EDGE has problems that CycloDS does not or vice versa? Lumping both together would cause a great deal of confusion in this instance. The fact is that even though EDGE is very similar to CycloDS, they are different devices and both release firmware updates at different rates with different changes. Unless each poster was required to explicitly specify if they are posting in relation to either CycloDS or EDGE, I dont see this working well...
Why stop there? Let's lump all the carts together! Yay! I mean, we're going to know from the title which cart they're talkinga bout, right? Who needs subforums?Urza said:Oh gee, its so hard to put the word "EDGE" or "CycloDS" in the title (which most people already do, and everyone should do).johnchan said:And what happens with the CycloDS and EDGE firmware gets out of sync, and EDGE has problems that CycloDS does not or vice versa? Lumping both together would cause a great deal of confusion in this instance. The fact is that even though EDGE is very similar to CycloDS, they are different devices and both release firmware updates at different rates with different changes. Unless each poster was required to explicitly specify if they are posting in relation to either CycloDS or EDGE, I dont see this working well...
OH GOD I CAN ALMOST IMAGINE THE HAVOC WRECKED BY A CONFUSION OF THE TWO
Or why clump any similar carts?LagunaCid said:Why stop there? Let's lump all the carts together! Yay! I mean, we're going to know from the title which cart they're talkinga bout, right? Who needs subforums?Urza said:Oh gee, its so hard to put the word "EDGE" or "CycloDS" in the title (which most people already do, and everyone should do).johnchan said:And what happens with the CycloDS and EDGE firmware gets out of sync, and EDGE has problems that CycloDS does not or vice versa? Lumping both together would cause a great deal of confusion in this instance. The fact is that even though EDGE is very similar to CycloDS, they are different devices and both release firmware updates at different rates with different changes. Unless each poster was required to explicitly specify if they are posting in relation to either CycloDS or EDGE, I dont see this working well...
OH GOD I CAN ALMOST IMAGINE THE HAVOC WRECKED BY A CONFUSION OF THE TWO

N-Card is completely different from the N5.starfox468 said:yeah, why is there a section for n-card
why would people even clone r4's? it sucks
I wouldn't, since its probably not going to happen.papyrus said:How long shall we wait for Edge section?