DSi Common Key Bruteforcer

[jonathanb9595]

hope this thin will work..... im running 3 at the same time and im at 183 million

S

 

[MadClaw]

I'm just glad Someone found the key, I'm mean if i found the key, I wouldnt know what to do with it but post it here XD, But just let the 31337 h4x0r have his fun with the key. And wait...

 

[WB3000]

I'm just glad Someone found the key, I'm mean if i found the key, I wouldnt know what to do with it but post it here XD, But just let the 31337 h4x0r have his fun with the key. And wait...

Key has not been found. A key has been claimed to have been found, however does not pass a single test through the program.

 

[MadClaw]

Oh so all this and loopy finding the key is a bunch of crap?

 

[jonathanb9595]

Oh so all this and loopy finding the key is a bunch of crap?

Well we are hoping he has it because he claims he has it but has not shared it.

its makin me insaying

not that I would kno wat to do with it but.... still

 

[darkriku2000]

He won't share it so that he can do something with it without nintendo or an inexperienced dev screwing it up

 

[WB3000]

Update (5/2)

Download: http://www.mediafire.com/?yj3ezkmmy2i
+ Debug mode added - useful for checking the outputs on each key.
+ During the operation, Keys per second as well as totals are shown.

 

[darkriku2000]

I don't think anybody is coming here anymore

 

[kinneas123]

I still am, for one.

Might as well keep it up until loopy does something with the key.

 

[jonathanb9595]

ya i think people r still coming........ at least i am

S man i wish this thing would find it

but o well it will come in all cood time

 

[WB3000]

I've gotten more information (read: files) which should REALLY speed things up.

I'm working on a build now, not for tonight but pretty soon.

 

[jonathanb9595]

I've gotten more information (read: files) which should REALLY speed things up.

I'm working on a build now, not for tonight but pretty soon.

does that mean instead ov getting 1,000 keys a second it will get like 1,500 are somethin???

 

[WB3000]

does that mean instead of getting 1,000 keys a second it will get like 1,500 are somethin???

I have an average of 24,000 here with my test build.

 

[fgghjjkll]

awww...lucky

 

[WB3000]

Updated: (5/5)

Download: http://www.mediafire.com/?zjmtdybjlum
+ Speed increase by roughly 16-20 times previous.
+ Fixed writing of common key to file.

 

[Timmy99]

I have 60.000 keys/s with my Intel C2D T9300 2,5GHz x2.

When i run 1 program single, i have 50.000 keys/s. 1 core ist 100%.
But when i run 2 program, then evry core have 30.000. why?
in the Taskmanager i have set program 1 to core 0 and program 2 to core 1. the priority is set to high.
Why then does not every core 50,000 keys/s?

sorry, my english is very bad.

EDIT:
Thx for this program

 

[jonathanb9595]

I've gotten more information (read: files) which should REALLY speed things up.

I'm working on a build now, not for tonight but pretty soon.

does that mean instead ov getting 1,000 keys a second it will get like 1,500 are somethin???

lucky... im only @ 20,000

good old duel core laptop

 

[Kaos]

I'm running it on 3 of my 4 cores, at 35,000 key/s per core.

I guess I'll just keep them running, since I can use the unused core for anything I need to do.

 

[cory1492]

Nice work on the speedups WB3000. Still no one has hit a valid key?

When i run 1 program single, i have 50.000 keys/s. 1 core ist 100%.
But when i run 2 program, then evry core have 30.000. why?
in the Taskmanager i have set program 1 to core 0 and program 2 to core 1. the priority is set to high.
Why then does not every core 50,000 keys/s?

Despite what manufacturers want you to think by their advertising, a dual core is not the same as two CPUs - a multi core shares cache and pipeline/bus resources and requires overhead as well as thread time for a thread manager to dispatch multiple processes to separate cores through a single bus. It is generally more efficient to use a single program that uses multi-core leveraged code properly than it is to use two instances of the same single threaded program with different core affinities, as you can see all you gain in running two instances is ~10k over a single instance where mulithreaded code should be able to see a gain slightly higher than that.

For a somewhat lame analogy, think of putting a Y splitter on a garden hose - you can still only fit so much water in the hose before the splitter and in each of the new paths after the split you will have lost some of the original pressure.

Related reading...
http://www.pugetsystems.com/articles.php?id=23
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-core_(computing)

 

[Jackreyes]

1.7 billion down....
how many to go?