I strongly disagree with all life in the universe as mandatorily being carbon-based or requiring water as its prime solvent. There are many many many ways to do chemistry, and I believe given the right circumstances and time there is NO reason for live not to appear in many many types of environment.
I believe in the size, age, and lifespan of this universe being limited. However, I also believe there is something beyond it. Scientists have pointed a probable cause of the "big bang" as being the fact that the universe went into a "lower state".
Imagine water turning into ice as it cools. The ice starts to form at one point that happens to a lower temperature than any other point. It is called a nucleation, and from there on the freeze expands in a sphere until the whole liquid freezes. Here too it is speculated that the universe was once at a higher state where all physical constants, the fabric of spacetime, etc were different. When it dropped to a lower state, the current universe was formed.
Currently our universe is believed to be the 'vacuum' state, the lowest possible state it can ever reach. However, if we're living in a false vacuum and there is a lower state than this, someday it may very well have its start at some point somewhere, and expand in a sphere at the speed of light, obliterating everything we know and bringing the universe to an even lower state, at which everything works differently.
The idea of multiverses does seem plausible to me. At an "absolute" level, I believe there is a form of content called "REALITY", which comprises ALL the universes and worlds and so on, and which has an infinite lifespan. Again, I may be wrong. Not all nice ideas are real.
As for travel, suppose we reach a point where we can genetically engineer ourselves to be immortal, and to experience no "boredom". We could indeed make the many-decades trips to other stars seem less of a drag.
It IS POSSIBLE to travel in a ship WITH OUR CURRENT TECH at what may locally seem as faster than the speed of light. This is the "blessing"-side of the speed limit but its huge disadvantage is that it is PURELY SUBJECTIVE. If you're in a ship and accellerate to what seems to you like 100 times the speed of light, then you WILL INDEED reach your destination at 100x lightspeed. A trip that would take 100 years at lightspeed will only take 1. However once you reach destination and get out of your spaceship, you will notice that 200 years have passed. Basically you approach lightspeed and your time slows down so that the whole trip seems much faster to you, faster than light even, but in reality you are STILL slower than light. Also consider you're hitting stray rocks and even gas clouds at almost lightspeed. At that speed any collision with anything no matter how small is catastrophic, so it would only work if space was a true clean empty vacuum.
You could line up a billion rotating black holes and ride on their ergospheres so that the space being dragged around faster than light combined with your own speed make you reach the destination faster.
As far as the fabric of space is concerned, you're still slower than light. But it's like a highway with a speed limit, when the road itself is acting as a treadmill. You will reach your destination without any of the nasty time dilation effects mentioned in the previous paragraphs. If you use a string of rotating black holes as a highway, you will exit it with more momentum than you came in with. The extra energy is being extracted from the black holes' rotational momentum and will, with enough exploitation, slow their rotation to a halt. Not to mention the astronomical ammount of effort required to set up such a system.
Warping spacetime is the holy grail of faster than light travel. A spaceship with a properly warped spacetime field around itself could be the perfect solution to FTL travel. However, so far the only force we know to do this is gravity, and gravity cannot be "generated", it is a property of matter and energy. The amount of matter to curve spacetime enough for a ship to travel is that of a few suns. Given this, it is highly impractical. And you'd need to be carrying that matter with you everywhere, so it would have to be portable and light. If you squeeze so much mass into the size of a ship, it becomes a black hole.