BBFC Says Violent games Less Harmful Than Films

Discussion in 'General Off-Topic Chat' started by Hadrian, Apr 24, 2007.

  1. Hadrian

    Hadrian Everybofy knows badgers like MASH POTATOES!

    Former Staff
    Oct 12, 2004
    United States
    From Joystiq

    "The British Board of Film Classification, which assigns content ratings to both films and video games, says that video game violence is less influential and harmful to young players than violence in films or television. The board came to this conclusion as a result of their 107-page study, "Playing Video Games," featuring interviews with players ranging from very young children to the middle-aged.

    Says BBFC spokeswoman Sue Clark, "We have traditionally taken the view that because a game is interactive, by definition we need to be more careful. But ... one of the key conclusions of this report is that interactivity actually helps players distance reality from adult experiences in games." The study was conducted to prepare for a revision of the BBFC's video-game ratings system -- which means that their new ratings may actually become less restrictive.

    A study, huh? Using research, data, and possibly even science to draw conclusions? Silly Brits! We independent-minded Americans can make judgements without any facts whatsoever!"
  2. adgloride

    adgloride Its A Wii Wario

    Apr 2, 2003
    Someone whos never played video games will probably have wrote the article. You don't see films as bloody or violent as GTA, The Suffering or Manhunt.
  3. Cyberdude93

    Cyberdude93 Advanced Member

    Jul 28, 2003