Anyone here use Comcast?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DeMoN
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 3,485
  • Replies Replies 21

DeMoN

GBAtemp Guru
Member
Joined
May 12, 2004
Messages
7,712
Solutions
2
Reaction score
150
Trophies
3
Website
Visit site
XP
3,263
Country
United States
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080829/wr_nm/...ast_internet_dc

Thanks to you select few torrent freaks out there, everyone is gonna have to pay. But I don't think it will affect most people, unless they have a really big family or are a geek. Trouble is, they might have to lower it further in the future as they get more subscribers.

QUOTE said:
Comcast to limit customers' broadband usage

By Yinka Adegoke Thu Aug 28, 10:20 PM ET

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Comcast Corp, the largest U.S. cable operator, said on Thursday it will cap customers' Internet usage starting October 1, in a bid to ensure the best service for the vast majority of its subscribers.
ADVERTISEMENT

Comcast said it was setting a monthly data usage threshold of 250 gigabytes per account for all residential high-speed Internet customers, or the equivalent of 50 million e-mails or 124 standard-definition movies.

"If a customer exceeds more than 250 GB and is one of the heaviest data users who consume the most data on our high-speed Internet service, he or she may receive a call from Comcast's Customer Security Assurance (CSA) group to notify them of excessive use," according to the company's updated Frequently Asked Questions on Excessive Use.

Customers who top 250 GB in a month twice in a six-month timeframe could have service terminated for a year.

Comcast said up to 99 percent of its 14 million Internet subscribers would not be affected by the new threshold, which it said would help ensure the quality of Internet delivery is not degraded by a minority of heavy users.

U.S. Internet subscribers are typically not aware of any limit on their Internet usage once they sign up to pay a flat monthly fee to their service provider.

As Web usage has rocketed, driven by the popularity of watching online video, photo-sharing and music downloading services, cable and phone companies have been considering various techniques to limit or manage heavy usage.

But Comcast has come under fire from a variety of sources for its network management techniques.

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission investigated complaints by consumer groups that it was blocking peer-to-peer applications like BitTorrent, and earlier this month ordered Comcast to modify its network management.

Comcast has said that by the end of the year it will change its network management practices to ensure all Web traffic is treated essentially the same, but has also been exploring other ways to prevent degradation of its Internet service delivery.

One consumer group said while Comcast's new 250 GB limit was "relatively high," it could eventually ensnare customers as technology progresses.

"If Comcast has oversold their network to the point of creating congestion problems, then well-disclosed caps for Internet use are a better short-term solution than Comcast's current practice of illegally blocking Internet traffic," said S Derek Turner of Free Press, a Washington, D.C.-based consumer advocacy group that filed a complaint about Comcast's network management practices earlier this year.

The Philadelphia-based company is not alone in trying to come up with ways to limit heavy Internet usage.

Time Warner Cable Inc, the second-largest U.S. cable operator, said in January it would run a trial of billing Internet subscribers based on usage rather than a flat fee.

Comcast spokesman Charlie Douglas said Comcast was also considering so-called consumption-based billing, but no decisions had been made.

(Editing by Braden Reddall)

NO INTERNETZ? WHATEVER WILL WE DOOO???
wacko.gif
 
250GB is still a lot... I don't know why you're complaining, because all you have to do is download a little less than 250GB per month. I'd be surprised if it was something around 100GB or less, but 250GB is fine.

Also I agree with Urza above.
 
What are you whining about >_> in Belgium you get 60gb for 45 euros (that's 70 dollars a month!). For unlimited bandwidth you have to cough up 80 euros (OVER 100 dollars / month).

So don't complain...
 
Oh, Im not even going to bother.. You guys whinge about those speeds and download limits.. I believe a maximum download speed of 175 /s is good.. Because thats all i get here.. And along with the phone bill plus its not unlimited downloads and it costs around 70 bucks a month...
 
JKR Firefox said:
What in the hell are you complaining about?

Here, Rogers allows a max of 60 GB's before laying down the law.

On my service Rogers allows a max of 95GB, and then charge $1.50 per GB up to $25. To piss the fuck out of them I downloaded 200GB, racked up almost $200 in extra charges, but only get charged an extra $25 for it. Fuck them.
 
When FiOS rolls out in my area, I want to leave my computer on for a month and download 1TB of garbage from Usenet to say farewell
 
All you Americans, quit bitching. We've been paying for bandwidth since the Middle Ages.
tongue.gif

Australia, and most other countries I think, are charged for bandwidth. I have something ridiculous like 15 gigs a month. You Americans have it great up there.
 
I hadn't heard anything about this from Comcast yet. Glad to see they are informing their customers of such decisions. And is there anyway I can view how much bandwidth I've used so far? How are we supposed to stay in the cap if they don't supply us a way of knowing how much we have used. Not that I use that much in a month (I don't think at least O_o).
 
What do you mean cannot seed? I can seed. Although all uploads of any kind seem to be capped at 40 KB/s.

Also, does this new limit count towards both downloads and uploads? So 125 download + 125 upload = 250 bandwidth? Or is it 250 download.
 
Mewgia said:
awdofgum said:
Well the problem with Comcast is that you cannot seed... 250GB is plenty.

They have been required by law to stop blocking that, donno if its gone into effect yet...
It has nothing to do with protocol blocking.

You can't seed effectively on Comcast because they have shitty up speed.
 
Urza said:
Mewgia said:
awdofgum said:
Well the problem with Comcast is that you cannot seed... 250GB is plenty.

They have been required by law to stop blocking that, donno if its gone into effect yet...
It has nothing to do with protocol blocking.

You can't seed effectively on Comcast because they have shitty up speed.

Ah I see.

Well I have like 60KBps up maximum and still manage to hold a 2.5ish ratio on blackcats...is it that much worse?
 
jumpman17 said:
What the heck, I'm upping at 125 KB/s right now. Maybe they did finally remove the up cap.
That seems about average for Comcast.

And there's no cap. The low up speed is a result of how the streams are distributed (which for Comcast in most areas is 6/1.5 iirc).
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum