ACTA Gets Killed

Gahars

Bakayaro Banzai
OP
Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Messages
10,255
Trophies
0
XP
14,723
Country
United States
I'd start out with some lame jokes, but I'm sure you just want me to shut up and get to the news already, so here it goes. (If you've lived under a rock for the past year or so and have never heard of ACTA, this will get you up to speed.)

ACTA is effectively dead, the European Commissioner for the Digital Agenda admitted Friday. An official spokesman said the “political reality” was the fight was over.

Neelie Kroes, speaking at a conference in Berlin, told delegates: “We have recently seen how many thousands of people are willing to protest against rules which they see as constraining the openness and innovation of the Internet.

“This is a strong new political voice. And as a force for openness, I welcome it, even if I do not always agree with everything it says on every subject.

“We are now likely to be in a world without SOPA and without ACTA.”

Her spokesman agreed that while Ms. Kroes never said ACTA was dead, the “political reality” is that it is.
Source: Tech Europe

Just to reiterate: While the treaty has not been struck down in any official manner yet (and so technically could still live on), the political support for it has pretty much dissipated. The chances of it being enacted are pretty nonexistent as of right now. ACTA is done for.

So yeah, let the internet celebrations begin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17 people

cris92x

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2008
Messages
419
Trophies
0
Age
31
XP
219
Country
United States
Wasn't expecting this to happen but good news, now we need Obama to veto CISPA and it's over.

What's over? Nothing. It's not going to be over.

Well not completely over but it will be gone for a few years.
It will never be over, the government is going to invade our privacy always its the necessary evil for "security". The question is when and how much privacy will we compromise. All other forms of communication are watched what makes the internet an exception?
 

Guild McCommunist

(not on boat)
Member
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
18,148
Trophies
0
Age
31
Location
The Danger Zone
XP
10,323
Country
United States
It will never be over, the government is going to invade our privacy always its the necessary evil for "security". The question is when and how much privacy will we compromise. All other forms of communication are watched what makes the internet an exception?

Christ, we get good news about how the government and nations around the world are defeating bills to protect our rights and we just get "NO THE GOVERMENT IS TRYING TO STEAL OUR PERSONAL INFORMATION AND INVADE OUR PRIVACY."

Can people ever stop crying about how government is a big meanie and realize how absolutely essential they are to our daily lives?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10 people

The Catboy

GBAtemp Official Catboy™: Boywife
Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
27,904
Trophies
4
Location
Making a non-binary fuss
XP
39,162
Country
Antarctica
Can people ever stop crying about how government is a big meanie and realize how absolutely essential they are to our daily lives?
Except for when they try to make bills like these. Leadership is one thing, but making bills to control the flow and or freedom of information is way too far. Yes there needs to be some control on the internet, but not to the point where they destroy it or just make everyone who lip syncs to their favorite song on youtube a terrorist.
 

Guild McCommunist

(not on boat)
Member
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
18,148
Trophies
0
Age
31
Location
The Danger Zone
XP
10,323
Country
United States
Can people ever stop crying about how government is a big meanie and realize how absolutely essential they are to our daily lives?
Except for when they try to make bills like these. Leadership is one thing, but making bills to control the flow and or freedom of information is way too far. Yes there needs to be some control on the internet, but not to the point where they destroy it or just make everyone who lip syncs to their favorite song on youtube a terrorist.

I thought the whole point that the bill was defeated completely throws that argument out the window.

It's like with the SOPA/PIPA thing. Everyone claimed government was "evil" for introducing such a thing. Even though it's not like everyone in government formed this bill, it was purposed by some people and defeated by everyone else.

Representative government is full of plenty of people to represent the entirety of the represented. Even if that means people who don't think like you or I do. To claim the government as a whole is bad because one facet of it represents one group of people in the governed area then that's just rather silly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people

Skelletonike

♂ ♥ Gallant Pervert ♥ ♀
Member
GBAtemp Patron
Joined
Dec 26, 2008
Messages
3,430
Trophies
3
Age
32
Location
Steam City
XP
2,679
Country
Portugal
To be honest, the government doesn't really care about this things that much, the ones that actually care and want them to be in effect are those greedy media companies that would profit the most from this.
A government is elected by the people, no matter what you think or say, if someone is your president, prime-minister, etc, then it's because the majority of the country voted in them, people can't just go and blame them all the time, they have their faults but they're human beings like us, if you didn't want them in power, then you shouldn't have voted for them (which is something people often seem to do, they vote in someone, things don't go the way they like and they just badmouth that politician). Anyway, all governments need to be liked, they wouldn't profit anything from being hated by the general masses, sure, they could earn some extra cash but they would lose the rest of the faith that people put in them, and that means a lot.

Well, I'm glad it seems to have failed.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    the vram is one advantage when it comes to AI but ends up being slower even with that and really AI is the only use case that needs more than 12gb vram right now
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Interesting lol
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    I think I watched a video where two games at 4K where eating just over 16GB of RAM and it's the one case where the 7900XT and XTX pulled ahead (minus RTX of course)
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    So my opinion is that they could age a bit better in the future, and maybe AMD will continue improving them via drivers like they tend to do. No guarantee there but they have done it in the past. Just a feeling I have.
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    cyberpunk at 4k without DLSS/fidelityfx *might* exceed 12gb
    +1
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    but that game barely runs at native 4k
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    I think it was some newer games and probably poorly optimized PS4 or PS5 ports
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    they definitely will age better but i feel dlss might outweigh that since it looks about as good as native resolution and much less demanding
    +1
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    When I played Cyberpunk on my old 2080 Ti it sucked lol
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    AMD could introduce something comparable to DLSS but nvidia's got a lot more experience with that
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    least amd 7xxx has tensor cores which the previous generations didn't so there is the potential for AI upscaling
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    They have FSR or whatever it's called and yeah it's still not great
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    so AMD seem to finally be starting to take AI seriously
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Oh yeah those new 8000 CPUs have AI cores built in that's interesting
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Maybe they plan on offloading to the CPU?
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Would be kinda cool to have the CPU and GPU working in random more
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Tandem even
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    i think i heard of that, it's a good idea, shouldn't need a dedicated GPU just to run a LLM or video upscaling
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    even the nvidia shield tv has AI video upscaling
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    LLMs can be run on cpu anyway but it's quite slow
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    Have you ever been beaten by a wet spaghetti noodle by your girlfriend because she has a twin sister, and you got confused and fucked her dad?
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    I had a girlfriend who had a twin sister and they would mess with me constantly.... Until one chipped a tooth then finally I could tell them apart.... Lol
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    They would have the same hair style the same clothes everything... Really messed with my head lol
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    @The Real Jdbye, I could see AMD trying to pull off the CPU GPU tandem thing, would be a way to maybe close the gap a bit with Nvidia. Plus it would kinda put Nvidia at a future disadvantage since Nvidia can't make X86/64 CPUs? Intel and AMD licensing issues... I wonder how much that has held back innovation.
    Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo: @The Real Jdbye, I could see AMD trying to pull off the CPU GPU tandem thing, would be a way to...