Review cover Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus 1TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe (Hardware)
Official GBAtemp Review

Product Information:

Up for review today is the Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus PCIe 4.0 NVMe drive, featuring max read/write speeds of 7000/5300 mb/s respectively, the Rocket 4 Plus guarantees ultra fast speeds for all your storage needs! But how do these specs live up to real use?

attachFull248286

Fastboi

Up for review today is the Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus PCIe 4.0 NVMe drive, featuring max read/write speeds of 7000/5300 mb/s respectively, the Rocket 4 Plus guarantees ultra fast speeds for all your storage needs! But how do these specs live up to real use? 

Review image Review image Review image

As usual with a Tom review, we’ll take a look at the box, mostly because I’m impressed: Inside of the cardboard box, instead of the usual throwaway plastic most companies tend to use, Sabrent opted to use a small, reusable metal tin for their packaging, which is really cool! Inside you’ll find the SSD itself, the 1TB version in my case, and a little installation guide if you need it (that is actually quite detailed, good job Sabrent!) For those new to PC hardware, installation is as simple as setting your M.2 standoff to the right position, slotting the NVMe in, and screwing it down into the standoff. Easy peasy for even the newest beginners. Specs-wise, the Rocket 4 Plus is pretty decent, featuring dedicated DDR4 DRAM cache (unfortunately I can’t find an exact number on how big), an estimated 700TBW lifespan rating, a ~333GB SLC cache (with the remaining NAND being TLC), a Phison PS5018-E18 controller offering up to PCIe 4.0 x4 lanes worth of speed, and featuring either a 1 year unregistered or 5 year registered warranty. 

attachFull248271 attachFull248274

All of that is well and good, but how well does it actually perform? Well, that kind of depends on the situation and how full your drive gets. During quick synthetic benchmarks, Sabrent’s advertised read/write speeds of 7000mb/5300mb/s are close enough to be called accurate thanks to both the DDR4 and the SLC cache that spans the drive (as SLC NAND is much faster to read/write to than other types of NAND). However, if for whatever reason you decide to start moving a huge number of files that manage to saturate that ~333GB SLC cache, speeds will DROP, and they’ll drop hard. Testing using iometer, my benchmarks showed that after writing ~333GBs worth of files in one go, the write speeds dropped significantly to around 600-700mb/s, a very long way from the max speeds I saw of ~5000mb/s, and can be worse than even some PCIe 3.0 NVMe's at full load. However, the circumstances of hitting this cache limit in one go is basically nonexistent for normal users, average everyday use should easily hit the advertised rates for most of the SSD’s capacity in sustained writes, although once you fill the NVMe with enough data you will start to see a drop in speed as the SLC is used up. Temperature-wise, the Rocket 4 Plus will throttle speeds as soon as the NAND reads 70C, but I only ever hit temps this high when pushing the NVMe to test the cache amount/speeds so once again, during normal usage you shouldn’t have a problem here. If you happen to want to use a drive like this for heavy write operations, like very high resolution video encoding and such things, you may want to invest in a heatsink for the drive (which Sabrent does offer), but otherwise any normal user can run this thing bare without issue. 

attachFull248273 attachFull248272

So is the Rocket 4 Plus NVMe worth the $200 price tag? Well, I’d personally say no...at least for the average user, anyways. When it comes to your average, everyday use-case you will basically never see any real world difference between a PCIe 3.0 and a PCIe 4.0 SSD beyond perhaps a second or two at best. Whether it’s OS boot times or game/program load times, the real world difference simply isn’t big enough to warrant the massively higher prices for PCIe 4.0 drives. You can pick up a 1TB PCIe 3.0 NVMe for nearly half the price, or double the storage if you’re willing to toss in a couple extra simoleons for more space. If you’re a hardcore user doing enterprise server work or maybe work with 4k+ video editing, then the Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus NVMe would definitely make sense for you. Otherwise, stick to Sabrent’s cheaper PCIe 3.0 options. 

Verdict

What We Liked ...
  • PCIe 4.0 = Fast.
  • Nice sized SLC caching provides good speeds for everyday use.
What We Didn't Like ...
  • A tad expensive for 1TB worth of storage.
  • If you happen to saturate the high amount of cache, write speeds tank.
  • Will get quite hot and throttle down under long sustained writes.
8
out of 10

Overall

So is the Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus NVMe worth buying? I suppose that just depends on your use-case. While the actual hardware of the Rocket 4 Plus is excellent, the price/performance benefits are basically non-existent at the time of writing, especially if you're already using an SSD of some sort. But if you absolutely have to have a PCIe 4.0 NVMe, look no further than the Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus.
Sabrent in the past have gone on pretty decent sale on Amazon, so if you are interested it may be work using something like Camelcamelcamel or hotukdeals to track it.

Also, be aware of the sector size if you plan on cloning a drive, Sabrent used to use 4K as opposed to 512B by default which could cause problems. They do provide a converter on their website, but it will wipe the drive.
 
[Will get quite hot and throttle down under long sustained writes.]

Definitely a no for me then.
 
Out of curiosity, how often do you do long sustained writes? In my tests I only really hit the temp limit during a 300+GB write, is there any particular workload you do that goes and writes 300+GB all at once?

Sometimes, is calling doing a backup. That's what I usually do with external hard disks.

And I don't want to leave the thing doing a backup of all my stuff only to find it fried due to overheating.
 
I run every one of my NVMe drives with some sort of heatsink. Or at the very least, I'll use an aluminum USB enclosure that acts like the heatsink itself. But even with all that, I never reach thermal limits on my drives doing sustained writes of about 20GB to 40GB at a time. (Usually .VHD files of Linux or Windows 10, for testing purposes)

Mu only beef with NVMe drives is that they never put enough DRAM cache on them. We need more than 1GB in 2021, people! Give us some 4GB and 8GB DRAM versions of the 1TB and larger variants! 2GB of DRAM cache should be the gold standard for 500GB drives, and so on. Tired of getting my full speed for the first 10 seconds of my file transfers, only to have the speeds tank to HDD speeds for the other 80% of the write. I shouldn't need to set aside 8GB of my system RAM as a drive cache in 2021, but HERE WE ARE...
 
Sometimes, is calling doing a backup. That's what I usually di with external hard disks.

And I don't want to leave the thing doing a backup of all my stuff only to find it fried due to overheating.
Sure, but this isn't an external HDD, it's an internal PCIe 4.0 SSD. You definitely wouldn't buy this and then put it in an external enclosure, otherwise you'll never see full speeds out of it.

I run every one of my NVMe writes with some sort of heatsink. Or at the very least, I'll use an aluminum USB enclosure that acts like the heatsink itself. But even with all that, I never reach thermal limits on my drives doing sustained writes of about 20GB to 40GB at a time. (Usually .VHD files of Linux or Windows 10, for testing purposes)

Mu only beef with NVMe drives is that they never put enough DRAM cache on them. We need more than 1GB in 2021, people! Give us some 4GB and 8GB DRAM versions of the 1TB and larger variants! 2GB of DRAM cache should be the gold standard for 500GB drives, and so on. Tired of getting my full speed for the first 10 seconds of my file transfers, only to have the speeds tank to HDD speeds for the other 80% of the write. I shouldn't need to set aside 8GB of my system RAM as a drive cache in 2021, but HERE WE ARE...
I mean, the dynamic SLC cache lets you hit the full 5gbps for at least 333GB at a time, DDR4 Caching isn't the only way to get full speeds out of an SSD these days.
 
Out of curiosity, how often do you do long sustained writes? In my tests I only really hit the temp limit during a 300+GB write, is there any particular workload you do that goes and writes 300+GB all at once?
i mean it also depends on how much cooling it got because all Gen4 ssds usually come with a massive passive heatsink to compensate

this one didnt but nowadays the boards include their own heatsinks
 
In all fairness, Sabrent is aware of the fact that the drive runs hot - not unusual as SSD speeds are ramping up with each generation. As @Tom Bombadildo mentioned, they sell it in two configurations - as a bare drive or bundled with a hefty cooler, heatpipes included. I hear that the latter option makes all the difference in sustained loads. It's not just a slab of aluminium or copper you'll normally see on a motherboard, some thought went into it. Price to performance it's hard to beat the rocket, it's a good drive for those who want to maximise the benefits of their gen 4 bus - not much else besides storage can truly take advantage of it right now.
 
As you promised,a very "hot" Review.:evil:

Thank you.:)
(Why they not add the Heatsink right away ?)

EDIT Ah,ok I see 25$ for the "Rocket" Heatpipe Version...
 
In all fairness, Sabrent is aware of the fact that the drive runs hot - not unusual as SSD speeds are ramping up with each generation. As @Tom Bombadildo mentioned, they sell it in two configurations - as a bare drive or bundled with a hefty cooler, heatpipes included. I hear that the latter option makes all the difference in sustained loads. It's not just a slab of aluminium or copper you'll normally see on a motherboard, some thought went into it. Price to performance it's hard to beat the rocket, it's a good drive for those who want to maximise the benefits of their gen 4 bus - not much else besides storage can truly take advantage of it right now.
Graphics cards could in the future, but they don't even really need to right now. So far, 4.0 is ahead of the curve in that regard. I just wish chip makers and motherboard makers would quit being so damn stingy with PCIe lanes, and just give us a full 64, no matter what chip or platform we buy.
 
Graphics cards could in the future, but they don't even really need to right now. So far, 4.0 is ahead of the curve in that regard. I just wish chip makers and motherboard makers would quit being so damn stingy with PCIe lanes, and just give us a full 64, no matter what chip or platform we buy.
Not really up to the motherboard maker, you're bottlenecked by the CPU, and the chipset, depending on which lanes you're talking about. That, and a lot of them are used by on-board peripherals - that built-in WiFi isn't working on good wishes and a prayer, it has to interface with the CPU. To use Zen 3 as an example, you have 24 Gen 4 lanes, 16x will go for the GPU slot, 4x is reserved for the chipset interconnect, so you have another 4x general purpose to work with, and you need to think about USB 3.0, NVME, networking beyond Gigabit etc. - if you need more lanes than this, desktop sockets and mid tier chipsets aren't for you. Consider TRX40 - Threadrippers have more lanes than most people have sense. Even going with a last generation pre-owned Threadripper can be advantageous in this scenario, and easier on the wallet. On desktop most peripherals will still use Gen 3 because the CPU simply doesn't have more lanes to spare.
 
Not really up to the motherboard maker, you're bottlenecked by the CPU, and the chipset, depending on which lanes you're talking about. That, and a lot of them are used by on-board peripherals - that built-in WiFi isn't working on good wishes and a prayer, it has to interface with the CPU. To use Zen 3 as an example, you have 24 Gen 4 lanes, 16x will go for the GPU slot, 4x is reserved for the chipset interconnect, so you have another 4x general purpose to work with, and you need to think about USB 3.0, NVME, networking beyond Gigabit etc. - if you need more lanes than this, desktop sockets and mid tier chipsets aren't for you. Consider TRX40 - Threadrippers have more lanes than most people have sense. Even going with a last generation pre-owned Threadripper can be advantageous in this scenario, and easier on the wallet. On desktop most peripherals will still use Gen 3 because the CPU simply doesn't have more lanes to spare.
I have 2 NVMe drives, a dedicated PCIe sound card, a graphics card, a Wi-Fi card (actual PCIe card for Wi-Fi) and I plan to add another NVMe drive to the spare PCIe 16x slot soon, along with a USB 3.2 gen 2 expansion card for more USB ports. I am on a Ryzen 7 3800X with an X570 chipset, and fear I'll run out of PCIe lanes while hurting their performance. Should I just go Threadripper next build?
 
I have 2 NVMe drives, a dedicated PCIe sound card, a graphics card, a Wi-Fi card (actual PCIe card for Wi-Fi) and I plan to add another NVMe drive to the spare PCIe 16x slot soon, along with a USB 3.2 gen 2 expansion card for more USB ports. I am on a Ryzen 7 3800X with an X570 chipset, and fear I'll run out of PCIe lanes while hurting their performance. Should I just go Threadripper next build?
I very much doubt you will see any performance impact whatsoever in any area of computing besides storage when it comes to PCIe Gen 4 in the foreseeable future - sound cards don't come anywhere near close to saturating PCIe Gen 1, let alone 4, and slotting them into anything excessive is a waste of lanes. Most I've seen nowadays use a 1x link for that reason. The same applies to most standard networking cards - you only need as much throughput as the card demands, so there's no point in overdoing it. I thought you had some kind of drive array or multiple GPU's to justify your lane requirement, but it sounds like you have an average build (component-wise, not spec-wise) and you're in no danger of running out. Remember, you have Gen 3 lanes in addition to Gen 4 lanes - plenty of them to go around unless you start using a large number of PCIe drives, 10 gigabit networking or some other style of component that would be considered "exotic" in a desktop. You do have two NVME's, but most motherboards will simply derate the GPU slot to 8x in scenarios where those lanes are needed elsewhere and, performance-wise, you probably won't even notice the difference (we've only just reached the point of a measurable performance difference between Gen 3 8x and Gen 3 16x, and it took years to materialise). With that said, if you feel like you *might* need them in the future, going the workstation route isn't a bad idea provided you can afford it. You'll certainly have enough cores to last you a lifetime, and more lanes than components to populate them with. Up to 88, to be exact. :lol:

When it comes to your specific scenario I would have to know what motherboard you have and what's the component layout (not all slots are equal - just because it says it's 16x doesn't mean it's running at that speed in your configuration). Even if the GPU ends up sharing the bus with the new full-sized drive, the impact would be effectively zero as neither component can saturate Gen 4 8x. More likely, the GPU will be directly connected to the CPU while the drive will piggy back off of the chipset, in which case you *might* see problems if you set it up as a boot drive. This actually does depend on the mobo and how it allocates the available lanes to slots.
 
You also forgot to mention that it can handle having 700TB of writes per 1TB of capacity which is better than quite a few other high performance drives on the market.
 
You also forgot to mention that it can handle having 700TB of writes per 1TB of capacity which is better than quite a few other high performance drives on the market.
While true, TBW ratings are very rarely accurate, since that will really just depend on the specific quality of your specific NAND flash for your specific drive, and are actually generally quite low ratings on a drives actual TBW. Even older drives from waaay back in the early 2010s have survived over 700TBs of writes from Tech Reports SSD endurance test, and a couple made it to 1.5PB.

They're less a strict rating and more a "if it fails after this we won't warranty it", kind of thing...assuming you actually ever hit that write during any manufacturers warranty period :lol:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Foxi4
Again, quite right. These ratings are calculated based on a specific sample size - some chips will perform better than others, no two are exactly the same. The silicon lottery doesn't just concern CPU's or GPU's - memory is binned as well, and even high bins can behave differently in different configurations.
 
Review cover
Product Information:

Reviews

  1. Tough enough to navigate and conquer the rugged wilderness.

  2. The Turtles are back for their umpteenth game outing, but is this one worth it?

  3. Alone in the Dark is a Survival Horror game available for PlayStation 5, Xbox Series S/X and PC.

  4. Step into post-apocalyptic Northern Finland in Rauniot, Act Normal Game’s debut point-and-click title. Let’s click away!

  5. Australia-based indie developer Drop Bear Bytes’ debut title, Broken Roads, launches today on PC and consoles. Does this new cRPG have what it takes to stand toe-to-toe to its contemporaries?

Site & Scene News

General chit-chat
Help Users
    Flame @ Flame: Never fight uphill, me boys.