Gamevice to take Nintendo on again over its patent, in attempt to ban Switch sales in the US

HKPB2.jpg

Not sated with having already lost to Nintendo multiple times in the past, Gamevice is back at it again. This time, they've filed a yet another new patent infringement complaint against Nintendo, alleging that Gamevice's patent on attachable game controllers was infringed on by the Nintendo Switch and its Joy-Cons. Not only that, but the company has also appealed the case they lost earlier this month, when the United States Patent and Appeal Board threw out their case, deciding that a company can't patent controller devices that clip on to tablet-like hardware. According to the US International Trade Commission, the complaint was filed under the Tariff Act of 1930, which would prohibit the sale of imported products that infringe upon a pre-existing American patent, meaning if Gamevice is somehow successful in their goal, the Japanese-created Nintendo Switch wouldn't be able to be sold in America. From here, it's up to the USITC to decide if the case is worth investigating, where we might see another months-long court battle kick off once more.

Letter to Lisa R. Barton, Secretary, USITC; requesting that the Commission conduct an investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, regarding Certain Portable Gaming Console Systems with Attachable Handheld Controllers and Components Thereof II. The Proposed Respondents are Nintendo Co., Ltd., Japan; and Nintendo of America, Inc., Redmond, WA.

:arrow: Source
 

RandomUser

Rosalina in Plush Form
Member
Joined
May 9, 2010
Messages
967
Trophies
1
XP
1,042
Country
United States
patents should forever expire 10 years after a product hits the market. copyrights on video games should expire too after 20 years of age and have to go open source
You can thank Disney for making the copyright lasting a long time. Trying to keep their characters from entering public domain.
Then there is an issue with trademark as they could classify Micky as their trademark thus preventing the public from using the character.
I could be wrong on that last bit though.
 
Last edited by RandomUser,
  • Like
Reactions: Ryccardo

scottydog27

Member
Newcomer
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
8
Trophies
0
Age
38
Location
Plymouth, Massachusetts
XP
382
Country
United States
dude give it a break
you cant win this case if your allowed to win then that opens up law suits agenst other split controllers that are made for disabled people and that would be causeing problems for laws agensat people with disability discrimination
 

LightBeam

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
977
Trophies
0
XP
2,446
Country
France
Meh, I mean ... Maybe they are doing that because they think they can get turn this into their advantage and have a deal with Nintendo ? Or maybe I'm just thinking of that because I have just seen an episode of Better Call Saul a few minutes ago ... I can't think of them being so naive they could get something like "ban the Switch from US stores", they must have something behind their mind. Or maybe I'm just over thinking, who knows
 

ChibiMofo

Elon Musk is my dog
Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2019
Messages
700
Trophies
0
XP
2,853
Country
Canada
Lets let Nintendo win "court costs" against these patent trolls (again) and see if they still have the stomach (read as: cash) to come back for another legal brutalization...
 

chrisrlink

Has a PhD in dueling
Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
5,561
Trophies
2
Location
duel acadamia
XP
5,742
Country
United States
the only way they can win is if the mob "disposes" of the lawyers pre trial as mush as i commend them for shutting down switch sales it's hopeless they'll just go bankrupt
 

ratamahatta

Active Member
Newcomer
Joined
Nov 23, 2009
Messages
44
Trophies
1
XP
602
Country
Australia
I think the headline should read:

Gamevice to take Nintendo on again over its patent, in a last ditch attempt to get some sort of settlement payment by being a pain in the arse.

But good chance they'll just be left with lots of court fees
 
D

Deleted User

Guest
This kind of action is economic cancer like many thing that plumb the system. I don't want to live in stoneage but why not just to fuck up all those people looking for money and likes.
 

Ev1l0rd

(⌐◥▶◀◤) girl - noirscape
Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
2,004
Trophies
1
Location
Site 19
Website
catgirlsin.space
XP
3,441
Country
Netherlands
It'll get thrown out. Probably even have the trademarks invalidated. Clip-on controllers are as old as time, the Switch's only new innovation on that end is bringing one to mainstream consoles.

A trademark needs to be consistently upheld for it not to fall into common use, in which case it becomes invalidated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JavaScribe

raxadian

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2018
Messages
4,361
Trophies
1
Age
41
XP
4,574
Country
Argentina
Again? Just how many lawsuits do this guys want to lose? Wireless remotes shouldn't be a valid patent, they have existed for like 80 years or something!
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    OctoAori20 @ OctoAori20: Nice nice-