Hacking why can't gba games boot from emunand

Daisy

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2015
Messages
397
Trophies
1
Location
UK
XP
3,303
Country
United Kingdom

Sketchy1

gbatemp's shadiest warez dealer
Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2016
Messages
1,553
Trophies
0
Age
25
XP
651
Country
United States
Fairly sure AL9H is like, completely safe.


question
ˈkwɛstʃ(ə)n
a sentence worded or expressed so as to elicit information.
Depends on what you do. There have been reports of people breaking a9lh, not able to boot a thing even though they use it regularly. With emunand no matter what, its impossible to brick
 

mikefor20

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2009
Messages
1,921
Trophies
2
Location
Mushroom Kingdom ( o Y o )
XP
3,816
Country
United States
This is another case of ignorance. Its WBFS vs FAT. BETA vs VHS. Emunand is slower, less reliable, and more complicated. Did I mention slower? Emunand is also harder on your sd. BUT it leaves the nand alone. This has some benefits. If you are experimenting with new,potentially dangerous stuff maybe.. If you want multipule nands as well then you can do that. But where you guys miss is A9LH WORKS WITH EMUNAND! What you need to truly ditch is MENUHAX! IT SUCKS. DITCH YOUR BETAMAX ALREADY All I see here is , I like my shitty unreliable menuhax.! Luma and A9LH supports 4 emu nands. then from there you can copy over one of your emunands to the sysnand and try it. you wont go back but you can! Stop whining, put on your big boy pants. Do you like installing things twice? Failed boots? Everything in general being slower? Then keep emunand. A9LH has the ability to restore your bricked nand. Think bootmii. You all are just scared to drive in the fast lane. Don't complain when you can't restore a backup or if your SD dies from CONSTANT read/writes.
 
Last edited by mikefor20,
  • Like
Reactions: Geezerdorf

ispano

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
69
Trophies
0
XP
167
Country
United States
emunand is better

Say that if you wish, but back it up with something. After all it's simply an opinion. EmuNAND most certainly has it's flaws, one of those being discussed here in this very thread. Safety wise, It doesn't really protect your CFW any better than A9LH does, and they both have advantages and disadvantages.
 

BlueFox gui

SOMEONE
Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2016
Messages
2,962
Trophies
1
Age
24
Location
NAS TERRAS DE HUE BR
XP
3,163
Country
Brazil
I can tell, because the only funny thing about all this is the fact that you insist to defend EmuNAND over SysNAND CFW.

I do not want to defend so much to emunand, but the two are pretty much the same thing. Just a CFW to install pirated applications just want to play or is THE SAME THING.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Say that if you wish, but back it up with something. After all it's simply an opinion. EmuNAND most certainly has it's flaws, one of those being discussed here in this very thread. Safety wise, It doesn't really protect your CFW any better than A9LH does, and they both have advantages and disadvantages.

The only disadvantages I see is the delay in the boot and the games of DSI and GBA, but I do not care about the delay in the boot, and I do not play DSI nor GBA, if it is to play GBA I play in xbox I always liked to play more Gba in the emulator XD
 
Last edited by BlueFox gui,
  • Like
Reactions: Maq47

Sketchy1

gbatemp's shadiest warez dealer
Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2016
Messages
1,553
Trophies
0
Age
25
XP
651
Country
United States
Here we go, another thread on which is better. Can't we just leave this as it is and leave it to peoples personal preference??? BOTH GIVE PEOPLE THE ABILITY TO PIRATE!!! Why tf does it honestly matter how they do it?

-Emunand is older, is harder on the SD, but eaisiest to set up, doesn't require 2.1 downgrade for o3ds, but requires 1-2 GB of SD, dependent on 3ds model, slower boot, easily restorable no matter how much you muck it up, more reliable for the noobish for initial setup cause of the zero brick chance, can have multiple which is the closest to owning 2 or more 3ds's

-A9lh grants faster boot times and no double space for gba-dsi roms, but on o3ds requires a 2.1 downgrade, runs from sysnand, higher brick chance during setup, firm protection, more reliable for smaller children who might update

Pros and cons of both, now why can't we leave it to each individual to decide which they want?? And lets not forget the magic word here: both. If you really cant decide which is better, you can go ahead and install BOTH.There is no need for people to get so hostile for either way of cfw
 
Last edited by Sketchy1,

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2: Goku likes to flip the bean to get others healthy