U.S. Supreme Court set to overturn Roe v. Wade abortion rights decision

[mammastuffing]

Amusing that after the Plandemic, the lefties are reeeing and screaming ''My body my choice'' again.

It's amusing that a lot of people were whining about having to wear a mask for everyones safety while screaming "My body, my choice". But when it comes to the rights of women they're basically screaming "Your body, my choice".

 

[Lacius]

That it has nothing to do with abortion? That it maintained that 21+ year old males where the primary demographic of representation?

I said the Fourteenth Amendment is broad by design, and you said "it's called chicanery." Are you saying those who wrote the Fourteenth Amendment did so with nefarious intent? Are you saying the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment was chicanery? I'm asking you to be specific so I can respond.

If the Fourteenth Amendment was broad by design, then that means it has broad applications by design. Whether or not abortion was specifically in mind is irrelevant to whether or not its broadness was by design.

 

[Drak0rex]

Human embryos contain their own unique set of DNA. A fetus that is still in the womb has the same amount of rights as one that is born prematurely or on time.

 

[Lacius]

Human embryos contain their own unique set of DNA. A fetus that is still in the womb has the same amount of rights as one that is born prematurely or on time.

A fetus is not a baby.

Neither a fetus nor baby have the right to use someone else's body against their will. If a woman terminates a pregnancy and the fetus cannot survive outside the mother, that's called an abortion. If a woman terminates a pregnancy and the baby can survive outside the mother, that's called a birth.

The DNA is irrelevant.

 

[Jayro]

Given the amount of right-wing stupidity running rampant in this thread, I feel like this belongs here:

 

[Drak0rex]

A fetus is not a baby.

Neither a fetus nor baby have the right to use someone else's body against their will. If a woman terminates a pregnancy and the fetus cannot survive outside the mother, that's called an abortion. If a woman terminates a pregnancy and the baby can survive outside the mother, that's called a birth.

The DNA is irrelevant.

Suppose that any of the many defenseless, terminated humans might have grown up to be converted into flaming, limp wristed soy vegans, and go on to do great things to further the agenda for your si...... You know what, nevermind. You're right, what was I thinking? Please, continue.

 

[Stone_Wings]

Suppose that any of the many defenseless, terminated humans might have grown up to be converted into flaming, limp wristed soy vegans, and go on to do great things to further the agenda for your si...... You know what, nevermind. You're right, what was I thinking? Please, continue.

Your reply has absolutely zero relavance to the comment you quoted. But please, continue, on how much the right cares about life after birth. Also, please elaborate on your use of the term "flaming". I certainly hope you aren't referring to someone being gay, although I'm near 100% certain you are. And in the case of a fetus later on becoming "flaming, limp wristed soy vegans, and go on to do great things for your side", you would most likely have zero issue with the abortion if you had a way of knowing something like that ahead of time. I bet you're all for the death penalty too, even though ALL life is precious.

 

[Drak0rex]

Your reply has absolutely zero relavance to the comment your quoted. But please, continue, on how much the right cares about life after birth.

Pfft! It wasn't meant to. It's called... ''SARCASM'' Your reply has absolutely zero to do with future humans having their necks cut and scraped out of the womb before birth

 

[Stone_Wings]

Pfft! It wasn't meant to. It's called... ''SARCASM''

Seems sarcasm is yet another topic you're clueless about. You weren't being sarcastic, you meant what you said. Not to mention it's not even proper use of sarcasm even if you inteded it to be. You're full of shit. You're just trying to walk back your words becasue you don't have anything of value to say after being called out for stupidity. "But but but! That's not what I meant! I was trying to make a funny!!!" BULLSHIT!

Edit: Nice edit you made there. As opposed to having their necks cut and scraped out of the womb AFTER birth? LMFAO!!! And did you actually just admit "FUTURE" humans? Why yes, in fact you did. Case closed. Thanks.

 

[Drak0rex]

Seems sarcasm is yet another topic you're clueless about. You weren't being sarcastic, you meant what you said. Not to mention it's not even proper use of sarcasm even if you inteded it to be. You're full of shit. You're just trying to walk back your words becasue you don't have anything of value to say after being called out for stupidity. "But but but! That's not what I meant! I was trying to make a funny!!!" BULLSHIT!

Die mad, bro. You're just here for my amusement.

 

[Stone_Wings]

Die mad, bro. You're just here for my amusement.

LOL! Thats the only thing you have left. A "you mad?" comment? LMFAO!!! Yeah, I'm raging over here at how little effort you make to justify your own stupidity. Why do conservatives have such a difficult time with simple questions?

Me: "You're for the death penalty?"
You: "Die mad bro!"

Great argument, genius. It's about as great as this classic:

Me: "Do you actually support freedom/medical freedom?"
Another conservative moron: "I don't know what those words mean."

 

[Jayro]

LOL! Thats the only thing you have left. A "you mad?" comment? LMFAO!!! Yeah, I'm raging over here at how little effort you make to justify your own stupidity. Why do conservatives have such a difficult time with simple questions?

Me: "You're for the death penalty?"
You: "Die mad bro!"

Great argument, genius. It's about as great as this classic:

Me: "Do you actually support freedom/medical freedom?"
Another conservative moron: "I don't know what those words mean."

Conservatives are a walking joke. They also like to preach this and that about Jesus, when they would hate Jesus if he were alive today. It's like they don't get that he was a brown middle-eastern socialist. And they can't fight the 'marriage equality' argument without dragging their shitty religion into it, which says NOTHING about it, by the way...

 

[Stone_Wings]

Alrighty then. Since you love abortions so much, this must be like porn to you. Happy jacking!

Avoid much? LMFAO! Can't even make this shit up. Just anser the question. So far you've given me "You mad bro? and "Never mind your question, here's a video for you."

 

[Jayro]

Alrighty then. Since you love abortions so much, this must be like porn to you. Happy jacking!

Reported, don't post shit like this.

 

[Drak0rex]

Reported, don't post shit like this.

But it's what you all want!

 

[Stone_Wings]

But it's what you all want!

How about answering the question though?

 

[Jayro]

But it's what you all want!

No, THIS is what we all want:

 

[Dakitten]

Oy, it is so easy for ignorant young men in this place to just assume "Slutty women just can't keep their legs closed and then take responsibility for their actions!" is a valid argument to make abortion illegal. I've got two kids, and they're wonderful little beasties, but they never got their sister due to complications that couldn't be helped. It took until after two months for the issue to become apparent, and it was possible that the kid could have come into the world (albeit with some serious issues) but there was also a decent chance that they all would have not had their mother. Sure, overturning Roe might not make that illegal everywhere, but the idea that it might be illegal anywhere is just insanity...

Also, I thought posting porn vids was a temp ban at least? Why is Drak0rex still posting? Speaks volumes to the moderation of this place still.

 

[Stone_Wings]

@Drak0rex So just laughs then? Still no answer? LOL! As I thought. All you have is a big fat nothing burger. I know it's common for people to laugh when they're nervous and afraid, but it usually doesn't last this long for most. What are you afraid of? Having your own foot shoved down your throat?

Posting whatever video you did that was bad enough for it to be removed and then proceeding to laugh at ones loss of a child due to medical complications? You're sick as fuck. I'd have perma banned you by now. Maybe we should have a poll and let the people decide. And if it's decided you're not wanted, you can always move to a "state" (forum, in case you're daft enough to not understand what I meant) where your beliefs are echoed. In fact, why haven't you already done so? You want women to move to a place where their beliefs are echoed by the majority. Why don't you do the same and gtfo of here? Practice what you preach or stfu. Oh, and how about answering the question?

 

[Deleted member 559230]

For the third time, protection isn't 100% effective.

For the second time using the pill is 99% effective, having an operation is 100% effective, using a condom is 86% effective, not having vaginal sex is 100% effective. If there is a will there is a way. You're simply making excuses for bad behavior because you don't give a shit and just want to sleep around and not take responsibility for your actions. You're a typical liberal shill.

@BitMasterPlus

You know what's so stupid about the don't have sex argument. What if its a married couple having sex wearing protection and yet some accident happens and the woman gets pregnant like a condom accidently ripping or something.

The fit the bill of conservative logic that they are married. And use protection. And yet by dumbass conservative logic they should be forced to take care of a kid they never intended. This kid can have financial consequences on the family if they cant afford it or mental consequences on a family that didn't want kids.

So should married couples never have sex ever? Only have sex to produce a child or however many they want and then never have sex ever again for the rest of their life. This is pure stupidity. But I'm sure a loser like you who never had sex wouldn't understand this.

People need to take responsibility for the life that they create regardless if they wanted to create that life or not. Killing an unborn child due to the fact the parents don't want to provide for it is murder.

All life huh. What about that steak on your plate?

It was really tasty. However, didn't you notice this thread is about human abortions?

Sexuality is a biological drive. In general, the desire for sex is comparable to the desire for food or water, regardless of whether or not you need it to literally survive. This "just say no" attitude of yours suggests you don't know what you're missing and don't understand sex.

Then masturbate or have non-vaginal sex, wear protection, take a pill, have an operation or simply don't have sex. It doesn't matter how horney you get you need to practice self control and if you do have sex you need to take responsibility for your actions. All you are doing is making excuses for irresponsible behavior and making excuses for bad behavior is supporting that bad behavior. If people like you on the left would stop making excuses then there would be less need for abortions, but you don't care about the mother or the baby. You just want to sleep around like sluts and take no responsibility for the life that you create.

It's amusing that a lot of people were whining about having to wear a mask for everyones safety while screaming "My body, my choice". But when it comes to the rights of women they're basically screaming "Your body, my choice".

Let me explain something to you. It's not just the women's life we're discussing. There's an innocent baby that did no wrong that's going to be sucked out and shredded into pieces because the parents simply don't want the child. It's also funny that all of these people wanting to force you to get a vaccine when it's your body suddenly claim the opposite and claim its the women's body and her choice.