The daily mail claims the N-word was found in emails on Hunter Biden's laptop

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hanafuda
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 24,387
  • Replies Replies 280
  • Likes Likes 2
  • Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions. Saying NO to fascists/nazis - if you are one of those, you are not welcome here
Status
Not open for further replies.
When Trump says "sending them" it is a figure of speech, meaning they are coming from Mexico. Try to keep up.
No. He said what he said, and it's moronic no matter how many times you run it through a translator or political spin machine.

Anyone coming into the country illegally is a criminal as they broke the law by crossing our border without permission.
Trump criminalized the process of seeking asylum, leaving migrants no legal means whatsoever to cross the border. I won't go in to the long history of the subject or why Republicans prefer a broken immigration system (so they can keep employing illegals for slave wages), but suffice it to say that at that point, migrants are "criminals" in the same sense that jaywalkers are.
 
Last edited by Xzi,
  • Like
Reactions: Deleted User
Nope. I'm actually defending the media for not going after this unsubstantiated gossip until there's something real to report.


I don't have to defend what I think Trump said because he spewed that toxic shit during a press conference. You people live in your own little world where Trump was allowed to say whatever he wanted. Whenever someone called him on his bullshit, your only move is to say that wasn't what he meant. Well, I'm going to take his word for what he meant over yours, since his actions never showed him to be a race uniter.

I'm not the delusional one here. I haven't lashed out at anything. You just have a problem accepting the truth.

ROFL, "Trump didn't say it, but I'm going to say he said it anyway". Total representation of the sort of "truth" you'll find in the Liberal main stream media.
 
ROFL, "Trump didn't say it, but I'm going to say he said it anyway". Total representation of the sort of "truth" you'll find in the Liberal main stream media.
Except he did say it, and it's on video. Vincentx77's version of the quote was just ever-so-slightly off.
 
When it comes to Colonies, there are two things Colonised People around the World and their Descendants such as I am believe in:
  1. The Head of State should be an Indigenous Person at least once; and
  2. Empathy is better than Tokenism.

The United States of America is a former Colony and, to the World, these rules apply; if they meant more for the actual People who call themselves Americans, it might help to solve some of the Racial Problems, including the one mentioned in this Post.
  • If a Native American ever became President and, seeing their Asian Ancestry alongside still-similar Life Philosophies, universally-banning Racist Language would be one of the simpler things immediately accomplished; and
  • The asinine dichotomy of American Racial Conflict, between the fact Minorities shout that they should be understood better and the argument only the same Race can understand the same Race, will finally have an ending, seeing that Native Americans have the least amount of People so to be able to reach the Presidency would have solved most of the heavy workload in the process.
But it took over a Century to even get a Mixed Race Female as Vice-President, so nobody is really holding their breath for a Native American President, or an Indigenous Australian Prime Minister, for that matter.

Until that day, though, it will always be the hilarity of the largest two Immigrant Races, fighting over power and historical slights between themselves, whilst concluding no other Immigrants are allowed in from here on out ...
 
Except he did say it, and it's on video. Vincentx77's version of the quote was just ever-so-slightly off.

He didn't use the words you're claiming he did and your implying meaning when it's not what he meant. Alas, you seem like the type that never admits fault so I'll just add you to my ignore list. No need to talk someone who thinks they are always right, it's a pointless en devour. Any future replies to my posts will be ignored.
 
ROFL, "Trump didn't say it, but I'm going to say he said it anyway". Total representation of the sort of "truth" you'll find in the Liberal main stream media.

Trump said, "When Mexico sends it's people, they're not sending their best. They're sending people who have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs, they're bringing crime, they're rapists, and some, I assume, are good people."

These are his exact words. I was going off of memory. It was a long four years. The mainstream media didn't cause this verbal diarrhea to leave his lips. He could have simply said that he was strongly against illegal border crossing and planned to be tough on anyone trying to enter the US illegally. That's not inflammatory. Some people don't agree with the position, but it is a valid position that some people do believe is the correct one for our country. What he said here, and in MANY other instances, incited hate.
 
Trump said, "When Mexico sends it's people, they're not sending their best. They're sending people who have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs, they're bringing crime, they're rapists, and some, I assume, are good people."

These are his exact words. I was going off of memory. It was a long four years. The mainstream media didn't cause this verbal diarrhea to leave his lips. He could have simply said that he was strongly against illegal border crossing and planned to be tough on anyone trying to enter the US illegally. That's not inflammatory. Some people don't agree with the position, but it is a valid position that some people do believe is the correct one for our country. What he said here, and in MANY other instances, incited hate.

If someone hates the illegal immigrants that are bringing drugs, crime and raping women and children that's their own prerogative. Trump doesn't control anyone's mind. That shouldn't even matter because what he said wasn't a lie. He wasn't trying to be racist and there's no racism to be found. Well, other than in the minds of the people who can't stand we had someone in office that told it like it was as opposed to some idiot that needs 20 people to go over their speeches. You know why we liked about Trump. He was honest when communicating with the country. That's rare, but you're probably a Liberal so the meaning of honesty goes right past you and out the window. Regardless, the only racism to be found is in your head. Liberals scream "racism" every single time they run into something they don't like or are incapable of understanding.
 
Last edited by Deleted member 559230,
He didn't use the words you're claiming he did and your implying meaning when it's not what he meant.
If he didn't mean exactly what he said then fuckwits like you never would've started worshipping him in the first place.
 
He didn't use the words you're claiming he did and your implying meaning when it's not what he meant. Alas, you seem like the type that never admits fault so I'll just add you to my ignore list. No need to talk someone who thinks they are always right, it's a pointless en devour. Any future replies to my posts will be ignored.

Actually, you can just do me a favor and add me to that ignore list.
If someone hates the illegal immigrants that are bringing drugs, crime and raping women and children that's their own prerogative. Trump doesn't control anyone's mind. That shouldn't even matter because what he said wasn't a lie. He wasn't trying to be racist and there's no racism to be found. Well, other than in the minds of the people who can't stand we had someone in office that told it like it was as opposed to some idiot that needs 20 people to go over their speeches. You know why we liked about Trump. He was honest when communicating with the country. That's rare, but you're probably a Liberal so the meaning of honesty with goes right past you and out the window. Regardless, the only racism to be found is in your head. Liberals scream "racism" every single time they run into something they don't like or are incapable of understanding.


Huh, and here I just assumed the reason you liked Trump was because you were uneducated and that there was a high probability that your mother and aunt were the same person. Who knew?
 
I don't have to defend what I think Trump said because he spewed that toxic shit during a press conference. You people live in your own little world where Trump was allowed to say whatever he wanted. Whenever someone called him on his bullshit, your only move is to say that wasn't what he meant. Well, I'm going to take his word for what he meant over yours, since his actions never showed him to be a race uniter

One can make a case where it was wrong for Trump to address border-hoppers as a collective group in labelling them criminals, murderers, and rapists--I mean are we really supposed to assume that he meant that all of them fit all categories? One can also make the case that the "they're" was "there're" which makes a verbal difference. One CANNOT make the case that he called "all Mexicans" "murders" and rapists--which is what you did.

"they're rapists, and some, I assume, are good people."

So here is another thing. If you are going to astute that Trump absolutely meant that all migrants were rapists--then why aren't you on his balls about calling rapists good people?

However, you'll turn around and deny the plausible scenario that Hunter abuses children because "the photos might be fake".

You are exactly what I am talking about.
 
Last edited by tabzer,
One can make a case where it was wrong for Trump to address border-hoppers as a collective group in labelling them criminals, murderers, and rapists--I mean are we really supposed to assume that he meant that all of them fit all categories? One can also make the case that the "they're" was "there're" which makes a verbal difference. One CANNOT make the case that he called "all Mexicans" "murders" and rapists--which is what you did.

There is absolutely no context in which "there're" makes any grammatical sense whatsoever. It also doesn't matter. He doesn't say it. Check youtube. If that's what you're hearing, get your ears examined.

"they're rapists, and some, I assume, are good people."

So here is another thing. If you are going to astute that Trump absolutely meant that all migrants were rapists--then why aren't you on his balls about calling rapists good people?

Is this really the only play you have? "Well he said this and you're not busting his balls on that." You're acting like a petulant 10 year old. Grow the fuck up.

However, you'll turn around and deny the plausible scenario that Hunter abuses children because "the photos might be fake".

You are exactly what I am talking about.

Incorrect. The scenario is far more plausible that the contents of the Hunter Biden laptop are faking, given that the US Government has had it in their possession for more than a year. A large portion of that time was with Donald Trump as president. Maybe he should've taken the weekend off from his intensive golfing at Mar-A-Lago to make sure something so highly sensitive was thoroughly investigated.

I am a liberal. I'm not sorry for it. I can see the alternative, and that is CLEARLY unacceptable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZeusX
There is absolutely no context in which "there're" makes any grammatical sense whatsoever. It also doesn't matter. He doesn't say it. Check youtube. If that's what you're hearing, get your ears examined.



Is this really the only play you have? "Well he said this and you're not busting his balls on that." You're acting like a petulant 10 year old. Grow the fuck up.



Incorrect. The scenario is far more plausible that the contents of the Hunter Biden laptop are faking, given that the US Government has had it in their possession for more than a year. A large portion of that time was with Donald Trump as president. Maybe he should've taken the weekend off from his intensive golfing at Mar-A-Lago to make sure something so highly sensitive was thoroughly investigated.

I am a liberal. I'm not sorry for it. I can see the alternative, and that is CLEARLY unacceptable.

Thanks for verifying. You'll nix a key point of him separating "good people" from the over-generalization of a group of migrants so that you can cry racism against all Mexicans--because you think you have to choose between two different heaps. I guess you are just stuck being a lying hypocrite because "the alternative is worse".
 
Do you think Hunter "grew up" you without the assistance of his father?

Are you saying your father is responsible for your issues?

Does he know that you think that?

If someone hates the illegal immigrants that are bringing drugs, crime and raping women and children that's their own prerogative.

Why single the immigrants out? The way he spoke was intentionally trying to associate drugs, crime and rape with immigrants when the percentage of immigrants involved in it is no higher than the number of american citizens involved in it.

Why do you think its ok to treat all immigrants badly because of the actions of a few, when you are unwilling to do the same thing to your own citizens?

"and some, I assume, are good people"

Why not assume that most of them are good people? Unless of course you're racist/xenophobic.

How do you feel about: When people vote republican they aren't the best people, they are crooked, racist, gun toting murderers, and some, I assume, are good people.
 
Last edited by smf,
Thanks for verifying. You'll nix a key point of him separating "good people" from the over-generalization of a group of migrants so that you can cry racism against all Mexicans--because you think you have to choose between two different heaps. I guess you are just stuck being a lying hypocrite because "the alternative is worse".

Didn't he think Roger Stone was a good person? I mean, if we're going to split hairs, here. I wonder how many children Trump abused? I mean, there is that clip on the View where he said he'd already be dating Ivanka if she weren't his own daughter (gross on so many levels). I also hear that sometimes he smells of Russian hooker urine. That might just be an ugly rumor, though.

Trump saying some were "good people" was simply a way of giving him an out from the bullshit that came from his mouth earlier. He knew that was going to come back around. It made his racist republican fans love him, while the rest of us cringed.

It's rich that I'm a lying hypocrite when you're the one trying to use Trump's loose use of grammatical syntax to bully people into agreeing with you. To quote someone far smarter than this entire conversation, "Not today, Satan!"
 
Last edited by vincentx77,
  • Like
Reactions: AmandaRose
It's rich that I'm a lying hypocrite

You claimed that Trump called all Mexicans "murders" and rapists, which is both a lie and hypocritical in light of your desire to signal empathy, understanding, or giving (only some people) the benefit of the doubt. Let's start there. Then we can work our way into the more outrageous claims that you are holding onto as you continue to reject photographic evidence. Go ahead, pretend that you care.

I see a scared rat.

Are you saying your father is responsible for your issues?

If both mooching off of and escaping accountability was by aid of my father, I'd think he'd feel somewhat responsible. I used "grew up" in respect to Hunter because he never grew up. He never found himself. He was given everything by his father, who prioritized his political career over his family. He became a glorified pet, his brother's shadow, and with no purpose or real role in life--so he fills that emptiness with the things that make a monster... and Biden just kept feeding it. Maybe since Hunter had been identified as a political interest with the Burisma scandal, Biden was forced to be more "caring" about his son. That's how it appears to me. If Biden wasn't the media's flavor of the week, you'd find this narrative on the front page disguised as journalism.
 
Last edited by tabzer,
If both mooching off of and escaping accountability was by aid of my father, I'd think he'd feel somewhat responsible. I used "grew up" in respect to Hunter because he never grew up. He never found himself. He was given everything by his father, who prioritized his political career over his family. He became a glorified pet, his brother's shadow, and with no purpose or real role in life--so he fills that emptiness with the things that make a monster... and Biden just kept feeding it. Maybe since Hunter had been identified as a political interest with the Burisma scandal, Biden was forced to be more "caring" about his son. That's how it appears to me. If Biden wasn't the media's flavor of the week, you'd find this narrative on the front page disguised as journalism.

And other things you make up in your mind.

What is your point?

That Joe Biden shouldn't have been a politician and then Hunter would have turned out differently?
That we shouldn't lock criminals up, because it's their parents fault?
 
Last edited by smf,
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum