Joe Biden is now officially the 46th President of the United States of America

[Julie_Pilgrim]

When you have written as much news and contributed to the scene(s) as much as I have, legitimate sourcing becomes very important. Which is why I have provided CLEAR source, while your side has only provided 3rd party sources. Hmm... weird?!?!

Out of context links vs actual trusted sources

 

[smf]

I have a feeling most of you do not do your own research or fact checking.

I have a feeling you do not do your own research or fact checking.

We both believe we are right and we both believe one of us is wrong, we are just disagreeing who it is.

So why can't it be you? Your argument lacks evidence, so it's more likely to be you.

 

[tthousand]

Out of context... LOL. It's called a direct line. It's a lot better then pointing to a source that in turn points to several sources. I am not interested in an easter egg hunt. If you guys cannot find where your information comes from, that's fine... but I do not see why I should have to find it for you.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

I have a feeling you do not do your own research or fact checking.

We both believe we are right and we both believe one of us is wrong, we are just disagreeing who it is.

So why can't it be you? Your argument lacks evidence, so it's more likely to be you.

I will admit I do not fully fact check everything, but I do try to look into both sides for evidence, or at least follow the sources so I can see for myself if it is true or not.

But I really do agree with you on this point, and appreciate you making it.

At the end of the day, we both could be wrong too.

 

[smf]

Out of context... LOL. It's called a direct line. It's a lot better then pointing to a source that in turn points to several sources. I am not interested in an easter egg hunt. If you guys cannot find where your information comes from, that's fine... but I do not see why I should have to find it for you.

I don't need evidence as I'm merely pointing out there is no evidence of what you claim.

I will admit I do not fully fact check everything, but I do try to look into both sides for evidence, or at least follow the sources so I can see for myself if it is true or not.

But it doesn't let you see for yourself if it's true if you believe something that has no real evidence.

 

[tthousand]

I don't need evidence as I'm merely pointing out there is no evidence of what you claim.

That was less directed at you than others. But seeing as you responded in that manner... which claim are you talking about?

 

[smf]

That was less directed at you than others. But seeing as you responded in that manner... which claim are you talking about?

All your earlier troll posts.

 

[tthousand]

But it doesn't let you see for yourself if it's true if you believe something that has no real evidence.

Honestly, I take everything with a grain of salt. I will admit I definitely do not know it all. I am just simply sharing what I hear, and not claiming anything to be my universal truth. Like I said, I am of a scientific mind where I question everything.

 

[smf]

I am just simply sharing what I hear, and not claiming anything to be my universal truth. Like I said, I am of a scientific mind where I question everything.

You are doing a poor job of showing that, when you post something that you aren't sure about then you should make clear that you don't believe it.

 

[tthousand]

All your earlier troll posts.

There is some trolling going on here for sure... but I am simply raising awareness to the unknown and citing we might not be seeing all there is to see. Instead, I tend to believe we are only shown what others want us to see. My eyes are open, and have been for a long, long time.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

You are doing a poor job of showing that, when you post something that you aren't sure about then you should make clear that you don't believe it.

I make a point of that in the future. I know on the internet it is very easy to misconstrue things and take them out of context.

 

[smf]

but I am simply raising awareness to the unknown and citing we might not be seeing all there is to see.

None of what you are posting is unknown.

Instead, I tend to believe we are only shown what others want us to see. My eyes are open, and have been for a long, long time.

Of course we are shown what people want to show us, but there isn't only one actor at play. So it's more likely you'll see practically everything, but some of it is a lie. The probability is that the lies are coming from Trump and his people, because of how often he's been caught lying before (Trump University etc).

Trump has always claimed that it's rigged when he doesn't win, its kinda unlikely that it was always rigged.

 

[Lacius]

There is some trolling going on here for sure... but I am simply raising awareness to the unknown and citing we might not be seeing all there is to see. Instead, I tend to believe we are only shown what others want us to see. My eyes are open, and have been for a long, long time.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------



I make a point of that in the future. I know on the internet it is very easy to misconstrue things and take them out of context.

There's a difference between skepticism and promoting conspiracy theory bullshit.

 

[tthousand]

There's a difference between skepticism and promoting conspiracy theory bullshit.

True. And I have not promoted anything consider conspiracy. I stated from the beginning I am not claiming anything as fact, and everything I did claim I have provided source material.

In return, I am treated to what I can only assume is regurgitated propaganda. No actual sources, only baseless opinions.

 

[smf]

In return, I am treated to what I can only assume is regurgitated propaganda.

To be fair, what you've posted is propaganda.

You don't seem to be aware of this.

 

[tthousand]

To be fair, what you've posted is propaganda.

You don't seem to be aware of this.

If you are going to attempt to tell me what I have done, could you at least explain yourself. I have no real response if you have no real comment.

 

[Lacius]

True. And I have not promoted anything consider conspiracy. I stated from the beginning I am not claiming anything as fact, and everything I did claim I have provided source material.

In return, I am treated to what I can only assume is regurgitated propaganda. No actual sources, only baseless opinions.

You literally said Nancy Pelosi has ties to the mob.

 

[Plasmaster09]

You literally said Nancy Pelosi has ties to the mob.

And also claimed that Biden making a little word slip-up, like he's done about a million times before, was totally not just an innocent mistake and definitely indicative of some super-secret interconnected Democrat voter fraud ring!

 

[chrisrlink]

You literally said Nancy Pelosi has ties to the mob.

nope pretty sure he meant the last guy n the oval office i wonder what the state of these investigations outside of the impeachment is going seems like that's the only way we'll prevent re electing his fat ass ince the impeachment is a dud i feel that the FBI should be looking into the dealings of the GOP senators first off especially the few who either incited or helped with the jan 6th attack

 

[Lacius]

nope pretty sure he meant the last guy n the oval office i wonder what the state of these investigations outside of the impeachment is going seems like that's the only way we'll prevent re electing his fat ass ince the impeachment is a dud i feel that the FBI should be looking into the dealings of the GOP senators first off especially the few who either incited or helped with the jan 6th attack

He effectively said Nancy Pelosi was an Italian mobster. Sorry. That was unclear, given Trump is the one who actually has ties to a mob.

 

[smf]

If you are going to attempt to tell me what I have done, could you at least explain yourself.

Have you forgotten what you've done?

 

[Lacius]

Have you forgotten what you've done?

We've also reminded him what he's posted. Don't expect a substantive response.