Joe Biden Wins - Becomes 46th president of the United States

  • Thread starter Thread starter yusuo
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 547,538
  • Replies Replies 7,444
  • Likes Likes 45
  • Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions. Saying NO to fascists/nazis - if you are one of those, you are not welcome here
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well yeah, trying to prevent the counting of thousands of completely legitimate and legal votes just because they're for Biden is a pretty shameless rigging of the election.
Random, individual, anecdotal cases of alleged election fraud with zero credible evidence to prove anything widespread, however, is not.
 
So it's okay to impeach Trump over inciting violence when the actual violence was tame compared to the BLM Protests.
One group intended to kill (terrorists at the capital. Yes I'll refer to them as terrorists from now on. You don't casually place bombs, and they were looking for the speaker of the house, to either kill her or take hostage. Along with AOC. )
While another group just wants to no longer be shot by cops, or be brutalized.
In other words, false dichotomy.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Also, I read that the amount of questions to have the U.S. citizenship increased from 10 to 20 and I agree with that. People should know the country's history if they want to join.
Actually, if you read those questions, quite a few of them are actually historically in accurate or missing things intentionally.
For example, when they ask what is protected by the first amendment (name one thing), peaceful assembly is missing. There is other situations where if you studied you would get it wrong, even though it is written.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

You're trying to compare almost a year worth of riots that resulted in hundreds of buildings being burned to the ground, hundreds of people assaulted, maimed and killed to a couple hundred people breaking into a single building and ransacking offices?
so... your defending people at the capital who had intent to kill?
I see
So.... burning down buildings, is somehow worse than, idk. trespassing into the captial, breaking into where the federal government mostly functions, expressly telling others to find AOC, speaker of the house, or saying Mike Pence should die....
that checks out yup I guess burning buildings is now equivalent to murder people in federal power

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Oh, and it's not like you know, they didn't have a goal, their goal was to overthrow the election they lost. Reinstating Trump.
I'll pass on authoritarianism thank you very much.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

As far as I know Trump hasn't made people vanish due to them criticizing him, his policies or decisions.
Secret police in portland anyone? You know, unnamed federal officers from home land security taking people into unmarked vehicles.
Hell, I believe if I'm not mistakened, John Boltons book (not a good guy. Just happened to dump info)
Wrote into his book that Trump wanted news reporters and people of the left either arrested or executed.
Not a dictator move at all.
anyways, I'm pretty sure BLM protestors have many things to say about Trump's current polices.
 
Last edited by ,
Well yeah, trying to prevent the counting of thousands of completely legitimate and legal votes just because they're for Biden is a pretty shameless rigging of the election.
Random, individual, anecdotal cases of alleged election fraud with zero credible evidence to prove anything widespread, however, is not.

That's not what they were trying to do though? They were trying to stop votes sent after the deadline, not postmarked properly, and not verified or that didn't have a witness inspect them from being counted.

And despite the constant parroting their isn't any evidence there's actually tons.l You just don't care or don't want to see it. In one state alone they had a small investigation and found 100,000 people voted twice for example. Genuine fraud and also incompetence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tabzer
That's not what they were trying to do though? They were trying to stop votes sent after the deadline, not postmarked properly, and not verified or that didn't have a witness inspect them from being counted.

And despite the constant parroting their isn't any evidence there's actually tons.l You just don't care or don't want to see it. In one state alone they had a small investigation and found 100,000 people voted twice for example. Genuine fraud and also incompetence.
First off, the votes they tried to prevent weren't any of what you're saying. They didn't give a shit. They were trying to stop places from counting votes entirely, which would have just resulted in a truckload of perfectly legitimate mail-in votes being blocked- taking into account the fact Trump told his supporters to vote in person while Democrats almost all voted by mail (to avoid Covid risk as well as the very suppression that Trump supporters would attempt anyway), it's probably the most blatant in-your-face form of attempted election rigging and voter suppression in US history.

Second off, you're conflating evidence with reliable evidence. There is tons, but there's also technically tons of points of 'evidence' for just about any shitty conspiracy theory. Individual anecdotes without any form of additional backup do not count as valid evidence, because they can be made up on a whim by quite literally anyone. And seriously? One state, small investigation, 100k fraudulent votes? Prove it. If such a thing happened, you better link to it- either it's an important thing to take note of and inform people about, or (more likely) it's another example of alleged fraud claims pulled directly from a ridiculous, retrograde Republican's retentive rectum.

(Oh, and third off, there*.)
 
RTkDrcWt.png


This terrorist had the intention if killing sacred political leaders. She surrendered her guns at the checkpoint, but she still has her hands!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doran754
View attachment 242157

This terrorist had the intention if killing sacred political leaders. She surrendered her guns at the checkpoint, but she still has her hands!
Considering she appears elderly, hopefully she isn't tech-literate enough to use said hands to spew half-assed trivialities claiming to be "epick Libtard-kiling sattire" (sic) as you display your propensity for right now.
 
Last edited by djpannda,
... nice... I can see you don't fact check .. like most of the MAGA ....
This lady took part of a protest in Kansas capitol, she was not in or took part of the Attempted COUP in the US Capitol ..
https://percolately.com/capitol-meemaw-not-at-riot/
EDIT: Kansas not Wisconsin
The best laid plans of mice and men often go awry... and so the worst laid plans of idiots and insurrectionists do as well. Every single attempt to either portray the Capitol riot as "calm" or "peaceful" or to blame it on antifa has failed miserably, so it's not surprising this too is bullshit.
 
And despite the constant parroting their isn't any evidence there's actually tons.l You just don't care or don't want to see it.
None of this "evidence" met the standard of proof even for Trump-appointed judges. It's at that point you should've realized that you were being played for a fool, but apparently that's when you let the sunk cost fallacy dominate your thought process instead.
 
As far as I know judges do not look at evidence before a case. This is done during a case. A court can deny opening a case if it believes it is none of their business (see Supreme Court).
 
As far as I know judges do not look at evidence before a case. This is done during a case. A court can deny opening a case if it believes it is none of their business (see Supreme Court).
thing is that in the 60 or so cases, they were all actually opened and held and the judges did look at the "evidence"... but it was all bullshit, which is why Trump lost all but one of them
 
Hard evidence?
And despite the constant parroting their isn't any evidence there's actually tons.l You just don't care or don't want to see it. In one state alone they had a small investigation and found 100,000 people voted twice for example. Genuine fraud and also incompetence.
But yet no one who’s claimed the election was rigged has provided any substantial amount of evidence :unsure: kind of weird how all of the evidence present either doesn’t hold up mathematically or is flimsy as fuck
 
Last edited by The Catboy,
Last edited by White_Raven_X,
That's not what they were trying to do though? They were trying to stop votes sent after the deadline, not postmarked properly, and not verified or that didn't have a witness inspect them from being counted.

And despite the constant parroting their isn't any evidence there's actually tons.l You just don't care or don't want to see it. In one state alone they had a small investigation and found 100,000 people voted twice for example. Genuine fraud and also incompetence.
I'll reiterate:

Even if your special 2 million votes were rigged, Biden won by over 7 million, so Biden still won the election legitimately. So really it makes fuck all difference if the election was rigged or not. At this point it's just Trump having no regard for democracy and trying to strongman his way into a second term regardless of the outcome of the election, and morons like you are falling for it. I honestly don't understand how so many Americans don't see what Trump is doing here. Who was the first person to spread rumours about the election being rigged? Trump. Who was the first person to stir the pot about mail ballots? Trump. He has manufactured these dramas and you and all the other Trumptards have fallen for it. The number of old anti-SJW channels I unsubbed from because they were parroting nonsense about the election being rigged is surprisingly high, and it has essentially cleared my subscription feed of that genre, and I doubt I will ever go near it again, because it's only been in the past 6 months that I've seen how toxic and ignorant that crowd is. The memes were fun and I still agree about everything they said regarding SJWs and other related crowds back in 2016-18, but they have become just as dogmatic and idiotic as SJWs were, all parroting the same bullshit, becoming increasingly more right wing and extreme and attacking people and ideas closer and closer to the centre and possibly the worst of all, being a hive-mind. You and others who are so intent on believing this bullshit about the election being rigged need to open your eyes to what's going on.
 
I'll reiterate:

Even if your special 2 million votes were rigged, Biden won by over 7 million, so Biden still won the election legitimately. So really it makes fuck all difference if the election was rigged or not. At this point it's just Trump having no regard for democracy and trying to strongman his way into a second term regardless of the outcome of the election, and morons like you are falling for it. I honestly don't understand how so many Americans don't see what Trump is doing here. Who was the first person to spread rumours about the election being rigged? Trump. Who was the first person to stir the pot about mail ballots? Trump. He has manufactured these dramas and you and all the other Trumptards have fallen for it. The number of old anti-SJW channels I unsubbed from because they were parroting nonsense about the election being rigged is surprisingly high, and it has essentially cleared my subscription feed of that genre, and I doubt I will ever go near it again, because it's only been in the past 6 months that I've seen how toxic and ignorant that crowd is. The memes were fun and I still agree about everything they said regarding SJWs and other related crowds back in 2016-18, but they have become just as dogmatic and idiotic as SJWs were, all parroting the same bullshit, becoming increasingly more right wing and extreme and attacking people and ideas closer and closer to the centre and possibly the worst of all, being a hive-mind. You and others who are so intent on believing this bullshit about the election being rigged need to open your eyes to what's going on.
Hot damn.
You know the Republicans are going too far when it knocks a centrist out of stable political orbit. :lol:
 
I'll reiterate:

Even if your special 2 million votes were rigged, Biden won by over 7 million, so Biden still won the election legitimately. So really it makes fuck all difference if the election was rigged or not. At this point it's just Trump having no regard for democracy and trying to strongman his way into a second term regardless of the outcome of the election, and morons like you are falling for it. I honestly don't understand how so many Americans don't see what Trump is doing here. Who was the first person to spread rumours about the election being rigged? Trump. Who was the first person to stir the pot about mail ballots? Trump. He has manufactured these dramas and you and all the other Trumptards have fallen for it. The number of old anti-SJW channels I unsubbed from because they were parroting nonsense about the election being rigged is surprisingly high, and it has essentially cleared my subscription feed of that genre, and I doubt I will ever go near it again, because it's only been in the past 6 months that I've seen how toxic and ignorant that crowd is. The memes were fun and I still agree about everything they said regarding SJWs and other related crowds back in 2016-18, but they have become just as dogmatic and idiotic as SJWs were, all parroting the same bullshit, becoming increasingly more right wing and extreme and attacking people and ideas closer and closer to the centre and possibly the worst of all, being a hive-mind. You and others who are so intent on believing this bullshit about the election being rigged need to open your eyes to what's going on.

The popular vote does not decide the president of the United states. Trump got less votes than Hillary in 2016.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

First off, the votes they tried to prevent weren't any of what you're saying. They didn't give a shit. They were trying to stop places from counting votes entirely, which would have just resulted in a truckload of perfectly legitimate mail-in votes being blocked- taking into account the fact Trump told his supporters to vote in person while Democrats almost all voted by mail (to avoid Covid risk as well as the very suppression that Trump supporters would attempt anyway), it's probably the most blatant in-your-face form of attempted election rigging and voter suppression in US history.

Second off, you're conflating evidence with reliable evidence. There is tons, but there's also technically tons of points of 'evidence' for just about any shitty conspiracy theory. Individual anecdotes without any form of additional backup do not count as valid evidence, because they can be made up on a whim by quite literally anyone. And seriously? One state, small investigation, 100k fraudulent votes? Prove it. If such a thing happened, you better link to it- either it's an important thing to take note of and inform people about, or (more likely) it's another example of alleged fraud claims pulled directly from a ridiculous, retrograde Republican's retentive rectum.

(Oh, and third off, there*.)
Well the problem about you people crying about no evidence and "prove it" is that the Biden campaign literally blocks any and all investigations that would look into the election and gather evidence.

it's a little hard to gather evidence when you're blocked from investigating don't you think?

"There's no evidence!"
"Can we investigate?"
"No."
 
  • Like
Reactions: tabzer
The popular vote does not decide the president of the United states. Trump got less votes than Hillary in 2016.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------


Well the problem about you people crying about no evidence and "prove it" is that the Biden campaign literally blocks any and all investigations that would look into the election and gather evidence.

it's a little hard to gather evidence when you're blocked from investigating don't you think?

"There's no evidence!"
"Can we investigate?"
"No."
Well, at least you admit Trump lost the popular vote then as he did now. Most Trumpnuts won't even accept that!
Also... the Biden campaign doesn't do SHIT. They haven't blocked investigations, let alone ALL investigations. There have BEEN investigations, on top of Trump's numerous sore-loser lawsuits- and whaddya know? Turns out things are legit!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ghjfdtg
The popular vote does not decide the president of the United states. Trump got less votes than Hillary in 2016.
Yes 306 electoral does
Well the problem about you people crying about no evidence and "prove it" is that the Biden campaign literally blocks any and all investigations that would look into the election and gather evidence.

it's a little hard to gather evidence when you're blocked from investigating don't you think?

"There's no evidence!"
"Can we investigate?"
"No."
Love how fake American you try to be because a Real American knows phrases like "burden of proof" and "presumption of innocence.""

Not “I lost, so let me find something wrong“
 
  • Like
Reactions: ghjfdtg and Lacius
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum