Oh man so sad.. tabzer with is trolling excusesIdk. For a group of people attributing all those bunk court losses to Trump, it's not a reach to assume that's already what you are doing.
Oh man so sad.. tabzer with is trolling excusesIdk. For a group of people attributing all those bunk court losses to Trump, it's not a reach to assume that's already what you are doing.
Oh man so sad.. tabzer with is trolling excuses
Nice way try to twist my words,
That's why over 60 court cases wasn't thrown out, oh wait.How did I twist your words. Harder proof (or evidence) of voter fraud exists more than proof (or evidence) that there isn't. It seems like that many people prefer knowing the truth over agreeing with the narrative.
1st, fuck off trying to be a Chad Hominem.1st, nobody wants to be you. 2nd It is not an excuse, it is a comparison.
How did I twist your words. Harder proof (or evidence) of voter fraud exists more than proof (or evidence) that there isn't. It seems like that many people prefer knowing the truth over agreeing with the narrative.
1st, fuck off trying to be a Chad Hominem.
2nd, it's not a comparison, it's a poorly-done tu quoque fallacy.
Also, there isn't significant hard evidence of voter fraud. That's the entire point. It's vacuous bullshit, and Trump's numerous attempts to take our very democracy to court have proven that by failing miserably.
You've accepted the claim that the election was "probably rigged," despite you being unaware of any evidence that the election was rigged. You are the one who doesn't care about finding the truth.Lol, ok. As long as it's in another language it must be legit. The "you are always wrong, I am allowed to be a hypocrite" fallacy.
Nice.
We have many people who demonstrate that they don't care about finding the truth, but that they would prefer to embellish their narrative.
As long as more people hate politicians because if this BS, I am satisfied.
...no???Lol, ok. As long as it's in another language it must be legit. The "you are always wrong, I am allowed to be a hypocrite" fallacy.
Nice.
We have many people who demonstrate that they don't care about finding the truth, but that they would prefer to embellish their narrative.
As long as more people hate politicians because if this BS, I am satisfied.
You've accepted the claim that the election was "probably rigged," despite you being unaware of any evidence that the election was rigged. You are the one who doesn't care about finding the truth.
...no???
Ad hominem is "to the person"- the "nobody wants to be you"
you literally have "we believe in election fraud" in your sig, linking to a website entirely composed of single-eyewitness claims or anecdotes (both very, very unreliable) that, even if it was actually all true (which it is demonstrably not), wouldn't even provide a THIRD of the victory marginYou want to quote me on that, so thay we can have access to context? I say thay because I am pretty sure it's getting to the point where it is undeniable.
Tu quoque is "you also"- acting like you did nothing wrong by claiming the opponent did it too.
you literally have "we believe in election fraud" in your sig, linking to a website entirely composed of single-eyewitness claims or anecdotes (both very, very unreliable) that, even if it was actually all true (which it is demonstrably not), wouldn't even provide a THIRD of the victory margin
also, he called your ARGUMENT sad
which it is
because you were just using tu quoque
back there as well, and poorly to boot
Sure.You want to quote me on that, so thay we can have access to context?
Every election, since JFK, has probably been rigged.
I am in the camp that thinks it is probably rigged
Well, we didn't blatantly try to (illegally and fraudulently) prevent votes from being counted.Trump, nor I, participated in referenced cases.
you do realize that just saying the words in Latin, not bothering to use it as a point of "this is the fallacy you are making" or anything, doesn't make you sound any smarter or your argument any more valid, right?tu quoque
Sure.
Ay up, first it was 1000, now it's thousands? Keep to the story mate.I guess 1000s
Ay up, first it was 1000, now it's thousands? Keep to the story mate.
And yes, in a country of 330 million people, it's hardly a stretch of the imagination that 1000 of them are brain dead enough to fabricate testimonies.
No evidence has been presented that there was widespread election fraud. Asserting the existence of evidence when no evidence has been presented is part of how you don't care about truth. A proper skeptic cannot accept claims as true or probably true in the absence of evidence.despite me disagreeing with you on the premise that there was no evidence--as I have always asserted the existence of evidence.
No evidence has been presented that there was widespread election fraud. Asserting the existence of evidence when no evidence has been presented is part of how you don't care about truth. A proper skeptic cannot accept claims as true or probably true in the absence of evidence.
You remind me of creationists; trying to ignore requests of hard evidence and trying but epically failing to 'prove' your view by using logic games. No matter how many logic games you try to play, you still can't solve the problem of there being no credible hard evidence to suggest widescale, coordinated election fraud in the 2020 elections. It doesn't matter if you think every election since JFK has been rigged and just by pure probability we should assume that Biden actually lost and let Trump wreck the place for 4 more years, that does fuck all to prove that it's actually happening.Ok. So I thought this election was probably rigged, despite me disagreeing with you on the premise that there was no evidence--as I have always asserted the existence of evidence. Ignoring the fact that we are in the present where more information is becoming available, please quote the part where I said that the election was probably rigged despite evidence.