-
Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.
Joe Biden Wins - Becomes 46th president of the United States
- Thread starter yusuo
- Start date
- Views 434,685
- Replies 7,444
- Likes 45
- Status
Ok but this conclusively proves nothing. It could have been Trump, yes. But it could have also been a rich Trump supporter. Until it's actually linked to Trump, this proves nothing. Jumping to 'TrUmP fUnDeD tHeM' is almost as standardless and idiotic as the election rigging conspiraceh.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Pretty much. Everything 4chan does is a meme, essentially.
Last edited by Cryoraptor,
The real Donald Trump has been in a coma since slipping on pearls dropped by Macaulay Culkin during filming of Home Alone 2.
Since then he is a computer controlled mannequin create by Bill Gates at the request of the Clintons. His hands were damaged as it's normal to protect yourself when falling by putting your arms out, which is why they couldn't take a cast from his real hands and they made a mistake and made the new ones too small. Technology wasn't good enough to get the correct skin tone back then either, which is how they got stuck with the wrong hue.
They created a personality that was able to fool low IQ people into thinking he was doing a great job, while destroying the economy from the inside. They also programmed him to say not to wear masks, because they wanted to kill all the low IQ people off as they do not contribute to the long term prosperity of the human race.
Once Biden gets in then the full extent of Trumps disastrous presidency will be revealed for Biden to clean up.
A friend of my cousin works in the intensive care hospital that is looking after the real Donald Trump, but phones are not allowed in there so they can't take pictures. Covid 19 was orchestrated as a cover to prevent investigations into the hospital.
It's all there to see.
Last edited by smf,
Which is, yet, more evidence of how the grand conspiracy is beyond our understanding.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Can someone please debunk this?
As in, try something that targets the error of the information instead of targeting who is reporting on it.
Ok come down sparky...
The convo was about the seditious coup rioters and if they can be charged with sedition or treason( if payments were from foreign entities) The convo was not about the President... unless You’re categorizing him as a rioter or the money man.
Idk. For a group of people attributing all those bunk court losses to Trump, it's not a reach to assume that's already what you are doing.
Although, I would sooner believe in the existence of birds before believing the mass voter fraud conspiracy. There’s actual evidence of that birds do exist.
Well there's evidence of both. Unfortunately the MSM shows preference on covering evidence that birds don't exist.
I'm personally piqued in Sullivan's findings on the matter.
Not mention Ruby's on video acknowledgement or the 1000 or so affidavits which have been considered a form of evidence up until the 21st century.
1000 witnesses or 1 Christopher Steele? You decide!
Last edited by tabzer,
, Reason: shows
1000 witnesses is not good evidence. There's several hundred thousand Trumptards, so to clear any likelihood of false testimony, you would need at least 1 million witnesses for something like this.
Witness statements should not be considered evidence of anything unless they can fit two criteria:
1. Multiple unrelated witness statements correlate and agree with each other
2. It is beyond reasonable doubt or likelihood that said witness statements are lies
Right now, 1000 statements for election fraud only barely satisfies the first, and does not come close to satisfying the second. For something as monumental as election fraud, you need actual hard evidence. 'Some people say so' is not good enough. Any old trumptard can come forward and claim that they saw Mr. Brown the democrat intefere with his vote, or Mr. Smith the democrat gave the guy in front an extra vote. We're talking about a country of nearly 330 million people. 1000 witness statements and a couple slip ups are not good enough to start claiming the entire thing was rigged. In a country that big, election fraud is bound to happen, but on nowhere near the kind of scale we're talking about.
Well, it used to be that by signing an affidavit is akin to testifying in court with the penalty of purjury. Now, I guess 1000s of people are willing to go to jail in order to lie about something they believe in. Huh....
Whereas 1 Christopher Steele is insulated with protection from the people he is trying to help. And his testimony gets more likes!
Whereas 1 Christopher Steele is insulated with protection from the people he is trying to help. And his testimony gets more likes!
Got any hard evidence or is it just more far-right conspiracy with lackluster sources?
Tbh the expectation of 1 million witnesses is very ridiculous.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Well, if video isn't hard evidence, then I guess the only evidence you would accept is when you are jailed right along with them.
1000 affidavits being far-right in terms of evidence? Yeah, I guess witnesses were always overrated anyway, lol.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Well, if video isn't hard evidence, then I guess the only evidence you would accept is when you are jailed right along with them.
1000 affidavits being far-right in terms of evidence? Yeah, I guess witnesses were always overrated anyway, lol.
And what are the creditably to these witnesses? Are they people involved in the polling? Are they reliable sources that can back up with their claims with evidence? Anyone can say anything, but without evidence, why should they be believed? Are there actual sources with actual evidence or is everything just hinging on flimsy evidence that still doesn’t add up to make a difference?
Last edited by The Catboy,
Interesting, that you only start asking questions when the official MSM narrative is challenged. Well, they are good questions. I hope they will be answered!
Nice way try to twist my words, you still didn’t provide any hard evidence towards mass voter fraud.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
