Joe Biden Wins - Becomes 46th president of the United States

[mammastuffing]

It maybe true that he is ignorant, unintelligent, and a gullible religious moron, but what you are saying would make anyone ashamed of associating with you on a public level. It looks like you are wishing a handicapped person to die because they are handicapped.

No, what I'm saying is that it's hurting him and people with his mindset more than the ones who are cautious and the the issue seriously, which may be harsh but it is basically survival of the fittest.

Don't get me wrong. I don't want anyone to suffer or die. But I think that losing people with a dangerous mindset will benefit the health of others.

 

[tabzer]

No, what I'm saying is that it's hurting him and people with his mindset more than me, which may be harsh but it is basically survival of the fittest.

What if he and those people develop a resistance, and you are the one to die out. Is it a good thing, in that case, too?

 

[mammastuffing]

What if he and those people develop a resistance, and you are the one to die out. Is it a good thing, in that case, too?

No. Because the bad thing is the disregard for other humans. The virus spreading is a symptom of ignorance from people like these. If you fix the symptom you haven't fixed the cause.

 

[tabzer]

No. Because the bad thing is the disregard for other humans. The virus spreading is a symptom of ignorance from people like these. If you fix the symptom you haven't fixed the cause.

The virus goes wherever it is accepted. It has nothing to do with ignorance. We, as a species, are collectively ignorant about the virus. Many survive it, and some do not. But to the point, is it survival of the fittest or is it not? It looks like you are trying to play both sides.

 

[jimbo13]

No. Because the bad thing is the disregard for other humans.

Good thing is that there are more people like you who die of covid because of your stupidity.

Ladies and gentlemen this is what we call cognitive dissonance, by a obnoxious preachy atheist brat and his parents internet.


But they care so much....! lulz


Amongst all the idiotic faith based zealots in the world, none are more aggressive, dim and hate filled than the atheist. I prefer the Satanists & otherkin worshipping dragons and giant kitties to these human refuse.

 

[tabzer]

Ladies and gentlemen this is what we call cognitive dissonance, by a obnoxious preachy atheist brat and his parents internet.


But they care so much....! lulz

Maybe you two deserve each other.

 

[mammastuffing]

Ladies and gentlemen this is what we call cognitive dissonance, by a obnoxious preachy atheist brat and his parents internet.


But they care so much....! lulz


Amongst all the idiotic faith based zealots in the world, none are more aggressive, dim and hate filled than the atheist. I prefer the Satanists & otherkin worshipping dragons and giant kitties to these human refuse.

Yeah, and don't forget that I also said

Don't get me wrong. I don't want anyone to suffer or die. But I think that losing people with a dangerous mindset will benefit the health of others.

The goal is to benefit the health of as many people as possible. You and your mindset is working against that. So yes, I care more about the people who also share the interest of well being for all than you. Sorry to tell you.

 

[jimbo13]

Yeah, and don't forget that I also said



The goal is to benefit the health of as many people as possible. You and your mindset is working against that. So yes, I care more about the people who also share the interest of well being for all than you. Sorry to tell you.

You have no clue about my mindset you dim degenerate brat.

You throw a stereotype on someone because they don't want to listen to your unoriginal parroted Hitchens sermon while you larp as a intellectual Atheist+ super douche and pretend to care about public health. Go snort some brown-brown, get a big hit of Jenkum and crawl in to a ditch in Liberia.

Your parents failed you, and they should take away your internet.

Brat.

 

[mammastuffing]

The virus goes wherever it is accepted. It has nothing to do with ignorance. We, as a species, are collectively ignorant about the virus. Many survive it, and some do not.

Yes, what is your point?

I'm not sure if you're being dishonest of if you just aren't getting it. It was an analogy. Groups of people who ignore the virus and expose themselves to it will probably run a higher risk of contracting it. People who contract the virus have a higher risk of dying from it.

Those who avoid it run a lesser risk on contracting it and this lesser risk of dying from it. Do you understand now?

 

[tabzer]

Yes, what is your point?

Friggen hell. You literally chopped of the point that was declared as "the point".

But to the point, is it survival of the fittest or is it not? It looks like you are trying to play both sides.

Don't play dumb. You two obviously have a different meaning of what "fit" means to you. You both don't want to live like the other. Congrats!

 

[AmandaRose]

Amongst all the idiotic faith based zealots in the world, none are more aggressive, dim and hate filled than the atheist.

You say nobody is more hate filed than an atheist. Yet most wars in the world have been over religion.

Abrahamic religions, with their self-defined Jealous God, are the worst in that respect. Every one of them, when it had secular power killed and tortured those who didn’t have exactly the same beliefs.

Christians spent hundreds of years burning heretics and waging religious wars, and those in Africa still do that. Jews under Joshua slaughtered the inhabitants of Palestine on Yahwah’s orders, and aren’t very nice to them even today. And I don’t even have to tell you how Muslims treat unbelievers and apostates.

Good example are the Balkans and Northern Ireland, where the people are very similar racially, but have religious feuds going back centuries based on which religion their ancestors converted to.

Religion also establishes the habit of believing implausible ideas based on ancient ignorant myths, which makes it easy for believers to reject the inconvenient truths of science, like evolution and global warming.

 

[mammastuffing]

You have no clue about my mindset you dim degenerate brat.

You throw a stereotype on someone because they don't want to listen to your unoriginal parroted Hitchens sermon while you larp as a intellectual Atheist+ super douche and pretend to care about public health. Go snort some brown-brown, get a big hit of Jenkum and crawl in to a ditch in Liberia.

Your parents failed you, and they should take away your internet.

Brat.

I don't see how wanting to have an honest, evidence based discussion would make someone a brat. I tried having a normal discussion but then you along and cross the line with insults. I'm sorry, I'm human so it take it personal so I came back at you. Seriously, can we just back up and keep it civil?

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Friggen hell. You literally chopped of the point that was declared as "the point".



Don't play dumb. You two obviously have a different meaning of what "fit" means to you. You both don't want to live like the other. Congrats!

Sorry, I don't think we're going to be able to have a discussion because I don't seem to understand you and you don't seem to understand me. You seem to think that I was making an argument which you want me to defend. It wasn't an argument and I've tried clarifying what I said but it almost seems like you deliberately are trying to misunderstand what I'm saying.

 

[tabzer]

Sorry, I don't think we're going to be able to have a discussion because I don't seem to understand you and you don't seem to understand me.

Well, when I say that something is "the point", it means that it is the actual point. And let me reiterate. If you believe in the creed of "survival of the fittest", and jumbo13 just happens to be stronger than you--that would make him your revered natural order.

 

[jimbo13]

You say nobody is more hate filed than an atheist. Yet most wars in the world have been over religion.

Abrahamic religions, with their self-defined Jealous God, are the worst in that respect. Every one of them, when it had secular power killed and tortured those who didn’t have exactly the same beliefs.

Christians spent hundreds of years burning heretics and waging religious wars, and those in Africa still do that. Jews under Joshua slaughtered the inhabitants of Palestine on Yahwah’s orders, and aren’t very nice to them even today. And I don’t even have to tell you how Muslims treat unbelievers and apostates.

Good example are the Balkans and Northern Ireland, where the people are very similar racially, but have religious feuds going back centuries based on which religion their ancestors converted to.

Religion also establishes the habit of believing implausible ideas based on ancient ignorant myths, which makes it easy for believers to reject the inconvenient truths of science, like evolution and global warming.

I don't converse with you, I am not interested in your constant victim mentality, dyslexia or hormone issues while you whine about how everyone in the world is against you.

Go back to liking the comments of people smart enough to make the points you can't.

Atheist Gosateizm killed more people in the 1900s than religion ever has or ever will.

 

[mammastuffing]

Well, when I make a point, I call it "the point". And let me reiterate. If you believe in the creed of "survival of the fittest", and jumbo13 just happens to be stronger than you--that would make him your revered natural order.

Survival of the fittest is not a creed. It is a phrase to describe natural selection. It is a process in nature that pushes evolution. Nothing more.

 

[tabzer]

Survival of the fittest is not a creed. It is a phrase to describe natural selection. It is a process in nature that pushes evolution. Nothing more.

It's also what you say that you believe, and has been referenced, by you, as the explanation of your behavior. That definitely makes the way you used it a creed. It's English. Not rocket science.

 

[mammastuffing]

It's also what you say that you believe, and has been referenced, by you, as the explanation of your behavior. That definitely makes the way you used it a creed. It's English. Not rocket science.

What did I say that I believe? That natural selection exists? Then yes. I don't understand why this is such a controversy. Do you not accept that evolution is real? And no, it is not a creed to accept scientific models.

 

[tabzer]

What did I say that I believe? That natural selection exists? Then yes. I don't understand why this is such a controversy. Do you not accept that evolution is real? And no, it is not a creed to accept scientific models.

The controversy is in how you define "fit", as I have mentioned already. Can you try to digest the entirety of a post before posting an emotional response?

And no, it is not a creed to accept scientific models.

Accepting scientific models, no. Using them to rationalize how you live your life, especially based on how you interpret their implications--definitely yes.

 

[AmandaRose]

I don't converse with you, I am not interested in your constant victim mentality, dyslexia or hormone issues while you whine about how everyone in the world is against you.

Go back to liking the comments of people smart enough to make the points you can't.

.

To quote Socrates

When you resort to name calling it shows the lack of intelligence and knowledge you actually have.

 

[mammastuffing]

The controversy is in how you define "fit", as I have mentioned already. Can you try to digest the entirety of a post before posting an emotional response?

Nice straw man. As far as I am concerned I have not defined the word "fit". And you haven't presented any clear objection to what whatever you think I've defined it as. But if we are debating what the word fit means in the context of survival of the fittest. What I mean when I'm talking about it is how it is used in the terms of natural selection. That's it. I can only refer you the theory after that.

Accepting scientific models, no. Using them to rationalize how you live your life, especially based on how you interpret their implications--definitely yes.

Again, I don't understand what you're talking about. Whose interpretation are we talking about here? Sounds like the intrepretation of your straw man.