Joe Biden Wins - Becomes 46th president of the United States

[UltraSUPRA]

Distribution is VERY MUCH so illegal you goober.

So to circle back on my question - since you think it isn't illegal, do you think distribution of CP is wrong?

"Moral" and "legal" mean two totally different things.

 

[djpannda]

Yes.

>believes that guns should be illegal
>uses a Simpsons quote

Lol I said the person was more respected than you not that it’s was a realperson (.hint that means you are less respected than a cartoon 8year old)

 

[Sicklyboy]

"Moral" and "legal" mean two totally different things.

You're not answering my question. Do you think that distribution of CP should be illegal, or should people be allowed to distribute it free of consequences from the government?

 

[djpannda]

"Moral" and "legal" mean two totally different things.

Lol half of me hopes Nintendo still stalk this forum for piracy and get the feds to follow up on you lol

 

[jimbo13]

Because as it stands right now, you just want to replace identity politics, with your own set of moral politics, and then police them until 10% of the population is in jail, just so you dont have to think about leather daddies, who you always think about.. Give people the freedom to exist in that regard (mostly in private anyhow) - an you'd almost not be a radical anymore..

I a secular hedonist whose personal hobbies outside of gaming consists of magic mushrooms, molly & DMT naked around a bonfire & group sex I am not a prude by any stretch of the imagination, I'm in a open poly marriage.

I am in to body modding, I have had dirty looks and discriminatory behavior for how I choose to behave, I don't give a fuck.

I loathed the religious right back in the day for the same cancel culture/behavior I loathe the left for now. People in the 90s didn't help the gay community out of the closet to make room to put the religious in it.

If your going to publicize your fetish's/kink or otherwise act like a weirdo in public I am not in the business of persecuting people who don't like it for thought crimes.

I believe in absolute freedom of thought and association.

I reserve the right to refuse service to anyone, at anytime for any reason no asterisk.

I reserve the right to like or dislike anyone's life style or behavior for any reason no asterisk.

I reserve the right to hire, employ or work with anyone I like, or not because of their life style or behavior no asterisk.​

I defy, detest, reject and loathe anyone left or right trying to involve themselves under the color of law determining the validity of those decisions I can make for myself.

I support Cletus's in bumfuck Louisiana's right to tell Blaine in his assless chaps to gtfo of his bakery.

I support Stephens right to tell Pastor preachstomuch to get out of his coffee shop with his morality lectures.

It's not about my comfort, I am comfortable with most anything and anyone. But I am not in the business of legislating what others have to be comfortable with under force of law.

I'm also not talking about the act of exploitation. I'm talking about the specific act of distribution. Where or how it came to be, as despicable as it is, is wholly irrelevant to this line of questioning.

Unless you remove the child from the situation you are engaging in sexual exploitation of a child. That is not speech.

 

[UltraSUPRA]

You're not answering my question. Do you think that distribution of CP should be illegal, or should people be allowed to distribute it free of consequences from the government?

No.
People who distribute child porn should be arrested, yes, but the distribution shouldn't be considered the crime. Rather, it should be used as evidence for the crime of acquisition. Am I making sense?

 

[Sicklyboy]

Unless you remove the child from the situation you are engaging in sexual exploitation of a child. That is not speech.

Since you seem like such an eager beaver to answer my question that @UltraSUPRA just keeps tiptoeing around - distribution of it is indeed considered speech, and has indeed been determined by the US Supreme Court that there are no First Amendment protections for the distribution of CP. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_v._Ferber

 

[djpannda]

No.
People who distribute child porn should be arrested, yes, but the distribution shouldn't be considered the crime. Rather, it should be used as evidence for the crime of acquisition. Am I making sense?

Lol change you story now I see.. don’t want Nintendo on you

 

[Sicklyboy]

No.
People who distribute child porn should be arrested, yes, but the distribution shouldn't be considered the crime. Rather, it should be used as evidence for the crime of acquisition. Am I making sense?

No, you don't make sense.

Yes, the words that you included in your post are all coherent and form cohesive sentences.

Your hot take, that distribution of CP should be legal, does not make sense.

 

[AmandaRose]

Lol change you story now I see.. don’t want Nintendo on you

He also supports abuse of other humans as he clearly said gaslighting is acceptable.

 

[UltraSUPRA]

He also supports abuse of other humans as he clearly said gaslighting is acceptable.

Gaslighting is a form of mental control that makes the inflicted person doubt everything they know. In other words, exactly what the media does.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

No, you don't make sense.

Yes, the words that you included in your post are all coherent and form cohesive sentences.

Your hot take, that distribution of CP should be legal, does not make sense.

You know what? I give up. All speech that doesn't involve the exploitation of a child is free speech.

 

[AmandaRose]

You know what? I give up. All speech that doesn't involve the exploitation of a child is free speech.

Except the law in your own country and others says differently as covered by the various hate crime laws around the world.

Also Gaslighting is a form of intimidation or psychological abuse, sometimes called Ambient Abuse it is also illegal in America. So you said gaslighting is acceptable Yes so then are you also saying it is acceptable to break your countries laws?

 

[UltraSUPRA]

Except the law in your own country and others says differently as covered by the various hate crime laws around the world.

Also Gaslighting is a form of intimidation or psychological abuse, sometimes called Ambient Abuse it is also illegal in America. So you said gaslighting is acceptable Yes so then are you also saying it is acceptable to break your countries laws?

You're talking to a pirate, here.

 

[AmandaRose]

You're talking to a pirate, here.

Yes a petty crime that doesn't come with a prison sentence unlike gaslighting which normally gets you several years in prison.

 

[Chary]

ITT: committing crimes is okay but only for ME.

 

[UltraSUPRA]

Yes a petty crime that doesn't come with a prison sentence unlike gaslighting which normally gets you several years in prison.

Does this mean we can jail CNN?

 

[omgcat]

it's Armageddon in the betting markets right now. the trumpers pumped so much money based on emotions instead of facts.

 

[Sicklyboy]

You know what? I give up. All speech that doesn't involve the exploitation of a child is free speech.

See now you're getting tripped up and it's pretty funny. First you argue that "all speech is free speech", "well, ok, wait, actually, not if it involves kids"

Should there not be laws preventing people from walking around in public fully nude, shopping fully nude, doing everything that they'd like with their meat and two veg flapping around? Because that is a form of expressive conduct, a type of speech. A type of speech which has been considered obscene and ruled, again by the US Supreme Court, that there are no protections for that kind of speech. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_test

Writing a book is also a form of speech. Writing a book and claiming it as your own work when in fact it's been wholly plagiarized from someone else is decidedly illegal, as that is a clear cut violation of copyright law.

I could keep going, but I know I'm just talking at you, and you're too far indoctrinated and are quite beyond help. All of what I'm saying here is for my own entertainment, as I know there's no way in hell it'd ever get through to you. I'm going to go do some more entertaining things now, like have a beer, pack a bowl, cook some dinner, and play Halo without calling people the epic gamer word, because whether or not the epic gamer word is considered freeze peach or not, I'm mature enough to realize that some kinds of speech are wrong, and I hope for your own sake that you mature in the same way eventually.

 

[gregory-samba]

Making, obtaining or distributing child porn is illegal, immoral and wrong. However, it has nothing to do with freedom of speech. Any laws that restrict your freedom to say what you want and not be harmed for it are violations and need not be adhered to. Hate / Thought crimes are not real and have been created to further restrict your freedom and control you. I don't need anyone telling me what I can do, say and think and I will resist anyone trying to do so.

 

[UltraSUPRA]

Should there not be laws preventing people from walking around in public fully nude, shopping fully nude, doing everything that they'd like with their meat and two veg flapping around? Because that is a form of expressive conduct, a type of speech. A type of speech which has been considered obscene and ruled, again by the US Supreme Court, that there are no protections for that kind of speech. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_test

That's not speech.

Writing a book is also a form of speech. Writing a book and claiming it as your own work when in fact it's been wholly plagiarized from someone else is decidedly illegal, as that is a clear cut violation of copyright law.

Your terms are acceptable.