Oh, because a president bought into a fraudulent voting system before he died which just so happened to have a witness coming forward to claim they heard conversations of fraud. That system is no longer fraudulent because 8 years have passed? Um, no.
Your story is messed up dude.
Its not "fraudulent or clean" voting system?
Its structural fraud possible on the scale you'd need for four states to flipp by several of thousands of votes.
And even more to the point, do the 'fraudulent cases suggested' even theoretically scale to the point, where they would be in anyones mind - to act criminally on them.
The potential simply isnt there - unless you show us how. You dont invest what 150.000*5000 USD in hush and motivation money, for people to literally risk jailtime, to sign up a dead relative, and then forge an ID. And even if you would - how on earth to you expect this to go unnoticed. One guys wive has to cheat, and tell the wrong guy and your entire scheme is blown wide open. or even better - the next year voter difference doubles to 300.000 votes and your entire scheme is null and void, from one year to the next.
Boy, you must be as dumb as the police is telling people that criminals are.
And all you bring are 'here we have 15 personal letters of people who saw something", and "voting lists are not being kept up to date".
Sure. None of that explains, how this could enable structural fraud.
You know this. You are in broken record mode by now.