Nintendo files two new lawsuits against TX-related resellers

nintendo_switch_sx_dongle_team_xecuter.jpg

The never-ending legal battle that sees Nintendo face off against the latest copyright circumventing piracy device continues with two brand new lawsuits. On May 15th, Nintendo filed a couple of lawsuits involving entities responsible for reselling devices used for the "sole purpose of which is to hack the Nintendo Switch video game console in order to allow people to play pirated video games." The first lawsuit is against a group of websites and their respective "John Doe" owners, for anxchip.com, axiogame.com, flashcarda.com, mod3dscards.com, nx-card.com, sxflashcard.com, txswitch.com, and usachips.com, while the second suit specifically targets Tom Dilts Jr. and their company Uberchips.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIOWESTERN DIVISIONNINTENDO OF AMERICA INC.
Plaintiff
,v.
TOM DILTS, JR.
and
UBERCHIPS, LLC, d/b/a UBERCHIPS.COM

Plaintiff Nintendo of America Inc., by and through its counsel, on personal knowledge as to its own actions and on information and belief as to the actions, capabilities, and motivations of others, hereby alleges as follows:

What all these sites have in common is that they sell Team Xecuter's SX dongle, which allows users to bypass the protection on the Nintendo Switch in order to load custom firmware. Nintendo alleges that these products are used purely for piracy. In the past, Nintendo's taken on TX multiple times, perhaps most notably in 2018 where they won a lawsuit against several people who were selling hacked NES Classic systems and SX chips for the Switch on Offerup.

FG0VPJI.png

Nintendo is seeking compensation for "irreparable" damages to the company, as all of the websites have warehouses within the United States, and thus fall within the confines of the law. The monetary demands amount to $2,500 per violation of 17 U.S.C. 1201 (a DMCA provision), as well as $150,000 per violation of Nintendo's rights under the U.S. Copyright Act, in addition to possibly requesting profits the resellers received from selling the offending devices.

:arrow: Source 1 / 2
 

kingaz

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2013
Messages
298
Trophies
0
Age
36
XP
877
Country
United States
It isn't, the only way Nintendo can even legitimately make them illegal would be using SX's piracy marketing.
You can compare the switch hacking scene to the iOS jailbreak, where it was deemed legal for consumers to use their hardware to do anything, it was deemed legal for users to unlock their phones that they paid for and install the software they want on it..

One good argument would be that "it's circumventing copyright protection" which can easily countered by the preservation, archiving and just using the hardware that you paid for like you want to. Which is why nobody, even Apple used that in in the past... Can easily be countered. This argument could work because, again, SX is marketing it as a piracy device and Nintendo can always just sue them for promoting illegal activities on their behalf.

Because jailbroken cellphones were deemed to have legitimate uses, the practice was granted an exemption under the DMCA. Video game consoles, by contrast, were denied such an exemption under the DMCA.

You really should learn more about this stuff before you make such bold claims.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8BitWonder

NoNAND

Give me back my legions!
Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Messages
2,274
Trophies
1
Location
Somewhere
XP
5,064
Country
Albania
Well those are legitimate claims. Rom sites sell copyrighted nintendo software.

TX sells the means to play such software, but not the software itself.
Fair point. But who knows what Nintendo might do. They surely have a lot of lawyers behind them.
 

Goku1992A

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2019
Messages
1,823
Trophies
1
Age
33
XP
2,619
Country
United States
You are talking about the "Dark Web"...which is deep end of the pool, while switch hacking is kiddy pool stuff legally. I really don't know what your point is by just shouting "dark web" as if you're so sinister and off the radar. This kind of stuff isn't what you go to "dark web" for, just order from China. Lmao.

lol I know I was just saying anything can be done if someone really want something... I dont know if the website was based in the US that's why they got sued but there are plenty places in China still sell RCM-Loaders and etc that enable piracy. Nintendo sueing the little guy solves nothing.

People dont realize that Nintendo would sue Atmosphere if they knew who they were. Atmosphere may not condone piracy but they left the door open.
 
Last edited by Goku1992A,
  • Like
Reactions: Fred Molyneux

SaltyDog

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
249
Trophies
1
Age
42
Location
Phoenix
XP
1,268
Country
United States
Curious how this will play out. The SX doesn't exactly sell with any preloaded games and the assertion that there is no legitimate use (like homebrew capabilities) is false.
Likely their goal is to tie these companies up in litigation. They won't have the time or money to fight it in court. Oddly enough, they'll dissolve and form a new company.
 
  • Like
Reactions: x65943

HRudyPlayZ

Developer, Gamer and Power User.
Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
371
Trophies
0
XP
2,062
Country
France
Because jailbroken cellphones were deemed to have legitimate uses, the practice was granted an exemption under the DMCA. Video game consoles, by contrast, were denied such an exemption under the DMCA.

You really should learn more about this stuff before you make such bold claims.
Except they didn't got denied. Though you're right, the exception only mentions cellphones. But you can still use that argument in court as no laws have been made on game consoles hacking (this is why it is considered a gray area). Hacking your consoles does have legitimate uses in the homebrew department, but there was no such case to add homebrewing as an exception yet...
Problem for this case is though, that SX used a bad marketing which means that their products can easily get deemed illegal as they're promoting the act of copyright circumvention...


Also EDIT: Technically, you could also argue that the Switch is also a tablet, which it is. Meaning that you could always fall in the legal territory by marking it as an exception x)
 
Last edited by HRudyPlayZ,
  • Like
Reactions: Lightyose

JuanMena

90's Kid, Old Skull Gamer & Artist
Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2019
Messages
4,893
Trophies
2
Age
30
Location
the 90's 💙
XP
10,132
Country
Mexico
I think it's fine.
I don't have a Nintendo Switch... but I'm assuming that as well as the 3DS, when you first turn on the console and agree to the User License Agreement, you hereby accept that the use of illegal hardware and software is prohibited by Nintendo.

So... to the people claiming: "Nintendo go fuck yourself because I can do whatever I want with my console" then you're wrong by this User Agreement that you accepted when you turned on your console for the first time.

Does it matter? Yes, because it's an agreement that you (the user) have with Nintendo.
 

RHOPKINS13

Geek
Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2009
Messages
1,354
Trophies
2
XP
2,625
Country
United States
Actually I think Nintendo has a pretty good case this time. If memory serves me correctly, SX OS includes proprietary keys that Atmosphere doesn't, keys that specifically enable piracy, and the keys themselves are Nintendo's property. So while they have a case against SX OS, I don't think they'd have a case against other dongle manufacturers like xkit's RCMLoader.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zxr750j

HRudyPlayZ

Developer, Gamer and Power User.
Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
371
Trophies
0
XP
2,062
Country
France
I think it's fine.
I don't have a Nintendo Switch... but I'm assuming that as well as the 3DS, when you first turn on the console and agree to the User License Agreement, you hereby accept that the use of illegal hardware and software is prohibited by Nintendo.

So... to the people claiming: "Nintendo go fuck yourself because I can do whatever I want with my console" then you're wrong by this User Agreement that you accepted when you turned on your console for the first time.

Does it matter? Yes, because it's an agreement that you (the user) have with Nintendo.

Nope. In most countries, EULAs aren't very effective anyways. Plus, please note that those EULAs apply to the use of online services, warranty and other things considered a service. It cannot apply to a product, like you cannot do a thing like "By buying and using this product, you agree to give me 90% of your revenue" and you could also argue that CFWs reset the EULA file anyways and that you never accepted those terms (which Nintendo doesn't have a proof otherwise as you reinstalled a FW).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lightyose

JayPea

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Mar 13, 2006
Messages
76
Trophies
1
XP
2,008
Country
United Kingdom
who here is old enough to know who bung is

I still have my Doctor V64 (with memory upgrade!). For some reason I have the adapter on my desk at the moment lol

v64.jpg


Before anyone points it out, yes it's orange. I went through a phase of taking my kit apart and custom spraying everything so I ended up with a powder blue N64, with a sunset yellow V64. No, I don't know why, either.
 
Last edited by JayPea,

HRudyPlayZ

Developer, Gamer and Power User.
Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
371
Trophies
0
XP
2,062
Country
France
Actually I think Nintendo has a pretty good case this time. If memory serves me correctly, SX OS includes proprietary keys that Atmosphere doesn't, keys that specifically enable piracy, and the keys themselves are Nintendo's property. So while they have a case against SX OS, I don't think they'd have a case against other dongle manufacturers like xkit's RCMLoader.
They do but not for those keys, Nintendo cannot (obviously) copyright a serie of numbers...
Though, they still have a good case as Nintendo will probably use the argument of the "piracy marketing".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ryccardo

kingaz

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2013
Messages
298
Trophies
0
Age
36
XP
877
Country
United States
Except they didn't got denied. Though you're right, the exception only mentions cellphones. But you can still use that argument in court as no laws have been made on game consoles hacking (this is why it is considered a gray area). Hacking your consoles does have legitimate uses in the homebrew department, but there was no such case to add homebrewing as an exception yet...
Problem for this case is though, that SX used a bad marketing which means that their products can easily get deemed illegal as they're promoting the act of copyright circumvention...


Also EDIT: Technically, you could also argue that the Switch is also a tablet, which it is. Meaning that you could always fall in the legal territory by marking it as an exception x)

https://www.federalregister.gov/doc...ht-protection-systems-for-access-control#h-22

As far as I know, this was the most recent ruling done for jailbreaking video game consoles *specifically.* And as you might notice, the library of congress rejects homebrew as an argument to grant an exemption.

Note that there were later DMCA exemptions granted for video game preservation, but that's outside of the purview of our discussion.

Edit: In their 2015 review, the Library of Congress reaffirmed the 2012 ruling.
 
Last edited by kingaz,

GoldenBullet

That One Guy
Editorial Team
Joined
Oct 27, 2014
Messages
571
Trophies
0
XP
2,527
Country
United States
We shouldn't be mad or even surprised about this. 70% of the people buying these and even the ones hacking their consoles are doing so to pirate games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zxr750j

hippy dave

BBMB
Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,883
Trophies
2
XP
29,281
Country
United Kingdom
that is the followup question
my original bung xchanger is sadly broke, but my gbxcart still works
My Doctor MGD3 card has Prince of Persia for gameboy colour on it, annoyingly I must have just left it with one game rather than a multi choice menu, and now I can't reflash it...
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrgone

huma_dawii

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2014
Messages
3,880
Trophies
2
Age
33
Location
Planet Earth
XP
4,270
Country
United States
Nintendo is so anti-consumer... what is wrong with them. They end up selling more overpriced Switches anyway...

My pre order got cancelled and now I don't know how TX is going to go about this... I guess I shouldn't have sold my hackeable Switch lol (I sold it because it I got a V2 Switch and TX chip was going to be my way out).

Long story short, Fuck You Nintendo.
 

Amadren

Pasta Hoarder
Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2014
Messages
296
Trophies
0
Location
Paris, France
XP
310
Country
France
To be fair, if nintendo were making a better console, I won't buy an SX Lite at all. I'm just gonna be using it for emulators and probably android + stadia because I love the format of the console and I'm used to it. If they gave us that from the beginning, maybe less people would buy hardware to hack ?
 

Goku1992A

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2019
Messages
1,823
Trophies
1
Age
33
XP
2,619
Country
United States
We shouldn't be mad or even surprised about this. 70% of the people buying these and even the ones hacking their consoles are doing so to pirate games.

Almost everyone uses CFW to pirate games if things were so peachy you wouldn't be hearing "my sigpatches dont work" lol. Nintendo is wasting time, resources , and money that can be used to develop kick ass games. They already have a good retaliation ring which is the banwave so all of this is pointless.

Not everyone is going to use the modchip such as the fuse-glee and I don't see people risking voiding their warranty on this anyway. Give SXOS their bone and just accept that security wasn't great. This isn't going to stop game sales because Animal Crossing and Pokemon Sword/Shield and Zelda still sold record breaking numbers despite the games getting leaked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cvskid

GoldenBullet

That One Guy
Editorial Team
Joined
Oct 27, 2014
Messages
571
Trophies
0
XP
2,527
Country
United States
Almost everyone uses CFW to pirate games if things were so peachy you wouldn't be hearing "my sigpatches dont work" lol. Nintendo is wasting time, resources , and money that can be used to develop kick ass games. They already have a good retaliation ring which is the banwave so all of this is pointless.

Not everyone is going to use the modchip such as the fuse-glee and I don't see people risking voiding their warranty on this anyway. Give SXOS their bone and just accept that security wasn't great. This isn't going to stop game sales because Animal Crossing and Pokemon Sword/Shield and Zelda still sold record breaking numbers despite the games getting leaked.
Yes but even though that people are going to be banned, that is still a loss in revenue as a lot of nintendo games are offline based anyways. Unfortunately for the people that really just want to customize their switch or do more legal things, they are in the very small minority. If you want to be mad at someone, people should be mad at TX for allowing backup loading, and everyone that asks for it.
 
Last edited by GoldenBullet,

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    SylverReZ @ SylverReZ: People are gonna find loopholes around clan tags and make inappropriate names.