I bought this Switch last May but it was never used for almost a year, until yesterday. Its firmware is 4.0.1.
I followed this guide [1] and made a NAND backup using the latest version of Hekate. For this, I used the basic hekate_ipl.ini provided in the guide.
Then I enabled AutoRCM, loaded Atmosphere and updated the system to 6.2.0 using ChoiDujourNX. I did not understand it, but just in case I replaced the basic hekate_ipl.ini file with the template provided directly by Hekate's developer(s). [2]
After using ChoiDujourNX, I noticed that another hekate_ipl.ini had been created in the root of the SD card. A security measure, I assume. This file only reads:
Now, the more complete, template file includes this line:
Do both configuration options refer to the same setting? Can I only use the more complete one? Which one takes precedence, the one in the bootloader directory?
I understand that applications such as ChoiDujourNX may need to specify their own settings to the boot loader, for they deal with important system changes (a firmware upgrade, none the less.) What I do not understand is why this file was created at the root of the SD at not within an application-specific or 'rules' directory within the bootloader one. It is not easy to tell which one takes precedence.
Related to this, are there any particular settings that one should specify to allow playing backups?
I grabbed the latest version of the patches and placed them within the atmosphere directory. But I have read messages referring to the disabling of signature checks within Hekate.
1. https://switchgui.de/switch-guide/
2. https://github.com/CTCaer/hekate/blob/master/res/hekate_ipl_template.ini
I followed this guide [1] and made a NAND backup using the latest version of Hekate. For this, I used the basic hekate_ipl.ini provided in the guide.
Then I enabled AutoRCM, loaded Atmosphere and updated the system to 6.2.0 using ChoiDujourNX. I did not understand it, but just in case I replaced the basic hekate_ipl.ini file with the template provided directly by Hekate's developer(s). [2]
After using ChoiDujourNX, I noticed that another hekate_ipl.ini had been created in the root of the SD card. A security measure, I assume. This file only reads:
Code:
[stock_DANGEROUS]
[PreventGCUpdate]
kip1patch=nogc
Now, the more complete, template file includes this line:
Code:
[line 8] autonogc=1
Do both configuration options refer to the same setting? Can I only use the more complete one? Which one takes precedence, the one in the bootloader directory?
I understand that applications such as ChoiDujourNX may need to specify their own settings to the boot loader, for they deal with important system changes (a firmware upgrade, none the less.) What I do not understand is why this file was created at the root of the SD at not within an application-specific or 'rules' directory within the bootloader one. It is not easy to tell which one takes precedence.
Related to this, are there any particular settings that one should specify to allow playing backups?
I grabbed the latest version of the patches and placed them within the atmosphere directory. But I have read messages referring to the disabling of signature checks within Hekate.
1. https://switchgui.de/switch-guide/
2. https://github.com/CTCaer/hekate/blob/master/res/hekate_ipl_template.ini







