Lets not use the 'everything' has consequences excuse when the issue I brought up is an imbalance cause by one sex having the ability to avoid them after the fact. None of this would be a problem if people were responsible but that is clearly not the case.
Also, the child support system is trash. No way to ensure funds going where they should(IE: They don't primarily benefit the child in my indirect experience.)
Because of rape and health concerns, I accept that it needs to be a thing. That people should have bodily autonomy in general.
The real shitty thing though is that the primary reasons for abortion are simply to avoid parenthood(Too young, not financially stable, don't want the child to interfere with studies, don't like the mate, just don't want kids, etc) rather than a strong feeling of wanting to end the pregnancy as a medical condition. Men have the same concerns but don't have a convenient excuse to take advantage of and thus there is an unfair imbalance in regards to their ability to impact their future after the act. But the primary reason this is the case is simply an issue of money. Someone has to foot the bill and so fairness and such gets tossed out the window. Who else besides the father would be able to? The Government/Taxpayers but that is an entirely separate can of worms.
Talking about ethics and morality in relation to this subject is weak anyway given where society already is.
why not, it's simple you come from the same country as i do, so you should've gotten the same system and teachings as i do.
you countradict your own words in the last part, first you wanna warn fathers to be for the financial part, and then you wanna cut the rope to escape.
a child needs a lot more then you think it needs, and though you say it doesn't primairly benefit the child to be, that's not true.
you see:
taxes that will come are put to fight legally (industrial) waste wich is a problem for the future of your to be child, is put in eductional progress wich is for a better future for your child, is used to pay our policeman to fight for low criminallety wich means the chances of your child of having a father and a mom throughout his life is higher, is used to pay our soldiers to keep a borderline a bit secured and so keep other countries from taking what's not thiers to begin with and to ensure, there's a ballanced country with room for your kid to find work when he's old enough.
since you and your child wanna be payed enough for doing work so you can spend it on basic needs of life means that the shop you get your daipers need a fair amount of money for the daipers to support thier personel, your now is also his or her future.
this brings the mothers side of the story, she'll need support to be healthy as can be to ensure milk quality, walking with the child, helping the child to explore the world and understand... not all teachings are teaced in school, some are in the garden, some at a sport, most of this will cost money to learn, bet without these lessons there's no real chance of a fair chance in his life to actual getting to face the world.
now comes the price of the health industrie, this is somewhat tricky cause there's a fine line... some docters are not really honest about chances for treatment being the cure, so i do understand if you take them out of th quotation, but i doubt you do.
the way you want it to be isn't fair to yourself and the girl you knocked over.
yes she might have volunteered in to the act, but so did you.
so you should see: action means responsibility you donated your part to her and started (might've been out of love, might've been for fun) the whole thing there.
since you it's your part combined to hers it's as much your problem as it is for her.
without your sperm injection gotten unprotected in to her womb there wouldn't be pregnancy to begin with.
this is not gonna mean she's fully ready to be mother, and it seems to me the same counts in your case for the father.
if you don't have the option to abort here, you make it the child to be's problem that either one of his or hers parents are unfit.
talking about being unresponsibility.
i'm furious that you say that father to be should have the right to eliminate the child to be when he's not even caring the child to be.
i'm moreso furious that you missing the brain part to see that the child to be is nothing more in the first weeks then a kidney is in her body.
you don't let your parents tell you when you donate a kidney do you?
this kidney has a the power to get to have a body around itself and think for itself in time.
but if one parent isn't gonna give ground to grow this way, why wait till it dies eventually.
- yes you have to pay much for a child, but not doing so means you're not fair to the child.
- not paying it's mom is just as evil.
- not giving her a say about what's in her body... i don't have words to say how evil i think you must be.
- thinking you have the right to tell her what's right and wrong when she's pregnant is even worse.