Turns out I confuse the boot9strap.firm for boot.firm.Thanks.
I decided that I would upgrade from arm9loaderhax to Boot9Strap. Whenever I load SafeB9SInstaller it keeps giving me this error: Sighaxed Firm - file not found.What do I do?
Are you using the correct one - the plain one, not ntr and not dev?i put both the .firm and .sha file in the boot9strap folder - which located in the root folder -, but when i tried to run it the status said Sighaxed FIRM - no sighaxed
anyone know what could cause the problem?
What do you mean? An application that bricks on purpose or something?I know this is out of topic, but might as well ask here than creating another thread. Is there any unsafeb9sinstaller? I need to test something.
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
I mean an app that'll install boot9strap without doing any safety checks.What do you mean? An application that bricks on purpose or something?
Why would you want this?I mean an app that'll install boot9strap without doing any safety checks.
As I've said, needed to test something. (I.e will be installing a different payload.)Why would you want this?
Out of curiosity, what is it you want to install?As I've said, needed to test something. (I.e will be installing a different payload.)
Luma.Out of curiosity, what is it you want to install?
Booting Luma3DS on its own as FIRM0/1 is very much not recommended. You should use boot9strap.Luma.
Yup, I know. But I still want to test it, also with godmode9. This I've been wanting ever since luma3ds supported booting directly as firm0/1 but I don't have time to make a permanent hardmod of my system so it got postponed. But now that I have ntrboot, hardmod isn't really necessary for my tests anymore.Booting Luma3DS on its own as FIRM0/1 is very much not recommended. You should use gm9.