I am convinced you are just looking for stuff now. USB-C is a *connection technology*...the chips at either end do the work. Everything with a USB-C connector "doesn't just" for *myriad* reasons.
More importantly, again, Nintendo has *clearly and repeatedly stated* their position on this, no matter how many times bloggers, forum respondents or anyone else tries to "re-write" their product narrative. Hell, it is literally the *first thing they say* in their overviews: "The Nintendo Switch is a Home Console that connects to your TV".
There is nothing in anything *Nintendo* has ever said that should lead you or anyone else to believe that Nintendo's product and intent was, as you described it, "a portable device that I am able to use on the go and quickly connect to a TV".
This is literally not that product nor has Nintendo ever said it was. Why there was any expectation that you could connect the thing to a TV without the path that was built for connecting to a TV and other things, is 100% beyond any data I am aware of to support this.
Additionally, why would they have Gamecube VC? The more likely scenario would be remakes, because then you don'T have to try to emulate an entire PowerPC architecture on ARM. No one even said they would. Again...fishing.
The product is what it is.
Did you really just deny the fact that this device is not meant to be portable? Might I direct you to the commercial where the Switch is featured on a
plane. Oh, but you're absolutely right. It's not meant to be used on the go. Using the Switch on a plane definitely doesn't make it an "on to go" device.
The commercials for the Switch make the device look to be portable, and that is a BIG percentage of the hype. The Switch is both a home console and a portable device. It's sad to see that you try to disprove my
opinions with Nintendo's intentions. Does this make it wrong for me to want something more from Nintendo? I guess so.
It really seems like you enjoy to shit in people's desires when it comes to hearing rumors. A major rumor about the Switch was the idea of it supporting GC VC.
You act as if it's wrong to hope to see something new come to their consoles.
In case you didn't notice, I'm not "all-knowledgable" on the device's capabilities. We don't know for sure if this is the path the Switch is going. I'd sure
hope that this isn't the path it's heading down.
You don't seem to understand that these are all rumor's I hope to either be true or false.
are you honestly trying to put down a Mario game for NOT having the same story as its predecessors?
Absolutely. Loved the idea for Cat-Bowser too. Made the game 100x better. The cat suit was an amaing idea.
Did you even watch the trailer, there was a lot of footage outside of the city level. There was the ice desert place, the low poly fruit volcano place, and the forest area. Not to mention that there will be more as it was a reveal trailer, not a release trailer
Did you not read my comments? I said I would love to see Nintendo stick to the way they have been designing their games for years. Everything about this game seems way too childish. But then again, it is a kid's game right? What the hell is a 17 year old playing these games for.
The city is the hub world, much like 64's castle or Sunshine's Delfino Plaza. It's pretty obvious from the trailer that there are several different worlds you can reach from there. Bowser and Peach were both in the trailer doing their typical thing too, so I don't know why you think they wouldn't be included as main story pieces.
The modern aspect disappoints me, as stated before. Reminds me too much of Sonic Adventure DX.