Gaming New Zelda game?

[osaka35]

I did not understand anything you just said.

Edited for easier understanding

 

[Xiphiidae]

Edited for easier understanding

Okay, well:

1. I said that I would like to see more games like LA or the Oracle games, and you responded with 'but Capcom don't want to make games', so I said that Capcom isn't really necessary as I'm just interested the same style of Zelda that the GB/GBC games were (and also that LA wasn't Capcom, obviously).

2. Are you note familiar with the acronyms for Zelda games? LoZ, AoL, aLttP, LA, OoT, MM, OoA, OoS, etc. It's not so much about laziness as it is about convenience; when we're talking about Zelda, you should know what the acronyms mean.

3. I don't understand how the way I said what I said was annoying; you'll have to explain what you mean.

 

[osaka35]

Okay, well:

1. I said that I would like to see more games like LA or the Oracle games, and you responded with 'but Capcom don't want to make games', so I said that Capcom isn't really necessary as I'm just interested the same style of Zelda that the GB/GBC games were (and also that LA wasn't Capcom, obviously).

2. Are you note familiar with the acronyms for Zelda games? LoZ, AoL, aLttP, LA, OoT, MM, OoA, OoS, etc. It's not so much about laziness as it is about convenience; when we're talking about Zelda, you should know what the acronyms mean.

3. I don't understand how the way I said what I said was annoying; you'll have to explain what you mean.

1. Perhaps I should have added a "" so you would have understood what I was saying.

2. I'm familiar with acronyms. They're an unnecessary layer of obfuscation used by people who don't care about being misunderstood. We're not specialist that have 500 intentionally unique specialized names that we have to keep track of. And we don't have t9 cellphones anymore.

3. The "of course" made it come across as pompous and overbearing.