The game wasn't actually running on the device, it was streamed from a PC.Just saw a video from CES, involving this device. Bloody hell I'm impressed, he played AC3 from the Steam Store, wow!
The game wasn't actually running on the device, it was streamed from a PC.Just saw a video from CES, involving this device. Bloody hell I'm impressed, he played AC3 from the Steam Store, wow!

Ah that explains a lot, must haven't heard that in the commentary.The game wasn't actually running on the device, it was streamed from a PC.
It will be a hell of a expensive emulation handheld
http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/7/38...at-project-shield-will-cost-a-bundle-of-money
Ouch. Yup, this thing is going to be expensive.This differs from the razors-and-razor blades approach, which isn’t just used by Gillette and Schick. Printer-companies use it, as well, making money from highly profitable ink. So do game-console companies, who primarily make their profit from premium games.
This time-honored approach isn’t the one we’re taking with Project SHIELD.

One thing that I don't like about this is that all demonstrations are from the pc streaming, OK, this is good if you have a nice pc capable of running games with full graphics. But how about the handheld itself?

